Kyril L Cole, Samuel A Tenhoeve, Majid Khan, Matthew C Findlay, Janet Cortez, Ramesh Grandhi, Sarah T Menacho
{"title":"Barriers to Care: Examining the Unique Obstacles of Indigenous American Patients With Acute Neurosurgical Injuries.","authors":"Kyril L Cole, Samuel A Tenhoeve, Majid Khan, Matthew C Findlay, Janet Cortez, Ramesh Grandhi, Sarah T Menacho","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Historically, Indigenous American (IA) populations have faced barriers to adequate health care. Although IA people experience higher rates of traumatic brain injury-related mortality than other racial groups in the United States, attributes of their neurosurgical care have not been evaluated. We demonstrate and compare care patterns and outcomes in IA and non-IA adults with acute neurosurgical injuries and identify disparities limiting access to medical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults hospitalized for acute neurosurgical injuries between 2017 and 2022 were identified in this retrospective cross-sectional study at our Level 1 trauma center. We evaluated demographics, distance to care, and in-hospital/aftercare characteristics in a propensity-matched analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 IA patients were identified. Propensity score analysis matched 77 IA and 77 non-IA patients with similar inclusion criteria on demographics, medical comorbidities, and distance traveled to neurosurgical care. IA patients traveled longer distances for care (236.3 vs 146.4 miles, P < .001), were more often direct admissions (35.1% vs 0.0%), were more often transported via ambulance (72.7% vs 57.1%) and less often via helicopter (20.8% vs 41.6%), and came from a broader cross-section of states. Average time from injury to care was 6 hours (IQR 3.0, 9.4). In-hospital care did not differ between groups; however, IA patients were less often discharged to rehabilitation (2.6% vs 14.3%, P = .009). IA in-hospital traumatic brain injury-related mortality was 8.3%. Fewer follow-up visits were completed in IA than in non-IA patients (40.2% vs 90.0%, P < .001), despite more attempted contacts (66.7% vs 30.6%, P < .001), with low telemedicine use in both groups (2.7% vs 5.5%). IA status and distance traveled were independent predictors of unmet follow-up visits (odds ratio 6.22 [95% CI 1.49-25.99, P = .012] and odds ratio 12.34 [95% CI 1.19-127.99, P = .035], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clear barriers to care were demonstrated for IA patients with acute neurosurgical injuries. Our findings indicate improvements are needed for this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"841-849"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Historically, Indigenous American (IA) populations have faced barriers to adequate health care. Although IA people experience higher rates of traumatic brain injury-related mortality than other racial groups in the United States, attributes of their neurosurgical care have not been evaluated. We demonstrate and compare care patterns and outcomes in IA and non-IA adults with acute neurosurgical injuries and identify disparities limiting access to medical care.
Methods: Adults hospitalized for acute neurosurgical injuries between 2017 and 2022 were identified in this retrospective cross-sectional study at our Level 1 trauma center. We evaluated demographics, distance to care, and in-hospital/aftercare characteristics in a propensity-matched analysis.
Results: A total of 81 IA patients were identified. Propensity score analysis matched 77 IA and 77 non-IA patients with similar inclusion criteria on demographics, medical comorbidities, and distance traveled to neurosurgical care. IA patients traveled longer distances for care (236.3 vs 146.4 miles, P < .001), were more often direct admissions (35.1% vs 0.0%), were more often transported via ambulance (72.7% vs 57.1%) and less often via helicopter (20.8% vs 41.6%), and came from a broader cross-section of states. Average time from injury to care was 6 hours (IQR 3.0, 9.4). In-hospital care did not differ between groups; however, IA patients were less often discharged to rehabilitation (2.6% vs 14.3%, P = .009). IA in-hospital traumatic brain injury-related mortality was 8.3%. Fewer follow-up visits were completed in IA than in non-IA patients (40.2% vs 90.0%, P < .001), despite more attempted contacts (66.7% vs 30.6%, P < .001), with low telemedicine use in both groups (2.7% vs 5.5%). IA status and distance traveled were independent predictors of unmet follow-up visits (odds ratio 6.22 [95% CI 1.49-25.99, P = .012] and odds ratio 12.34 [95% CI 1.19-127.99, P = .035], respectively).
Conclusion: Clear barriers to care were demonstrated for IA patients with acute neurosurgical injuries. Our findings indicate improvements are needed for this vulnerable population.
背景和目标:历史上,美洲土著人口在获得适当的医疗保健方面一直面临障碍。尽管在美国,IA人群的创伤性脑损伤相关死亡率高于其他种族群体,但他们的神经外科护理属性尚未得到评估。我们展示并比较了急性神经外科损伤的IA和非IA成人的护理模式和结果,并确定了限制获得医疗护理的差异。方法:在我们的一级创伤中心进行回顾性横断面研究,确定2017年至2022年间因急性神经外科损伤住院的成年人。我们在倾向匹配分析中评估了人口统计学、护理距离和住院/护理后特征。结果:共发现81例IA患者。倾向评分分析匹配了77例IA和77例非IA患者,他们在人口统计学、医疗合并症和到神经外科护理的距离方面具有相似的纳入标准。IA患者接受治疗的距离更远(236.3英里对146.4英里,P < 0.001),更经常直接入院(35.1%对0.0%),更经常通过救护车运送(72.7%对57.1%),更少通过直升机运送(20.8%对41.6%),并且来自更广泛的州。从受伤到护理的平均时间为6小时(IQR 3.0, 9.4)。住院治疗在两组之间没有差异;然而,IA患者很少出院康复(2.6% vs 14.3%, P = 0.009)。IA院内外伤性脑损伤相关死亡率为8.3%。IA患者的随访次数少于非IA患者(40.2% vs 90.0%, P < .001),尽管尝试接触的次数较多(66.7% vs 30.6%, P < .001),两组的远程医疗使用率均较低(2.7% vs 5.5%)。IA状态和旅行距离是未满足随访的独立预测因子(比值比分别为6.22 [95% CI 1.49-25.99, P = 0.012]和12.34 [95% CI 1.19-127.99, P = 0.035])。结论:对于急性神经外科损伤的IA患者,明确了护理障碍。我们的研究结果表明,这一弱势群体需要改善。
期刊介绍:
Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery.
Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.