Comparative evaluation of cellular senescence in naturally aged and stress-induced murine macrophages for identifying optimum senescent macrophage study systems.

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Md Danish, Bhawna Diwan, Amit Kumar, Mohd Adil Khan, Ankita Awasthi, Lalit Sharma, Rohit Sharma
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of cellular senescence in naturally aged and stress-induced murine macrophages for identifying optimum senescent macrophage study systems.","authors":"Md Danish, Bhawna Diwan, Amit Kumar, Mohd Adil Khan, Ankita Awasthi, Lalit Sharma, Rohit Sharma","doi":"10.1007/s11033-025-10232-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role and relevance of macrophages both as causes and therapeutics of cellular senescence is rapidly emerging. However, current knowledge regarding the extent and depth of senescence in macrophages in vivo is limited and controversial. Further, acute models of stress-induced senescence in transformed/cancerous macrophage cell lines are being used although their efficacy and relevance are not characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The present study sought to address these aspects by first comparing prevalent senescence in naturally aged murine peritoneal macrophages, and then assessing the effects of two different stressors (LPS and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) in inducing premature senescence in young peritoneal macrophages. Next, RAW264.7 cell line was exposed to respective stressors and their efficiency in recapitulating the effects of natural senescence markers was characterized. We observed strong upregulation of primary markers of senescence such as SA-β-gal activity, p53, p21, p16<sup>Inka4a</sup>, Rb, ATM, and Lamin B1in naturally aged mice along with increased SASP proteins (IL-6/TNF-α/MCP-1) and redox stress (ROS and NO). Aged macrophages also demonstrated severely reduced phagocytosis. Exposure to both LPS and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in young macrophages invoked the expression of all primary markers of senescence although SASP protein expression was exaggerated in LPS stimulation. Similarly, ROS and NO expression increased while phagocytosis decreased. Stimulation of RAW264.7 cells generally revealed a similar trend although the depth of all measured parameters was ostensibly stronger in young peritoneal macrophages. Among the two stressors, LPS stimulation appeared to be relatively more potent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, this study emphasizes that LPS exposure to young peritoneal macrophages more strongly recapitulates in vivo cellular senescence in macrophages.</p>","PeriodicalId":18755,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Biology Reports","volume":"52 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Biology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-025-10232-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role and relevance of macrophages both as causes and therapeutics of cellular senescence is rapidly emerging. However, current knowledge regarding the extent and depth of senescence in macrophages in vivo is limited and controversial. Further, acute models of stress-induced senescence in transformed/cancerous macrophage cell lines are being used although their efficacy and relevance are not characterized.

Methods and results: The present study sought to address these aspects by first comparing prevalent senescence in naturally aged murine peritoneal macrophages, and then assessing the effects of two different stressors (LPS and H2O2) in inducing premature senescence in young peritoneal macrophages. Next, RAW264.7 cell line was exposed to respective stressors and their efficiency in recapitulating the effects of natural senescence markers was characterized. We observed strong upregulation of primary markers of senescence such as SA-β-gal activity, p53, p21, p16Inka4a, Rb, ATM, and Lamin B1in naturally aged mice along with increased SASP proteins (IL-6/TNF-α/MCP-1) and redox stress (ROS and NO). Aged macrophages also demonstrated severely reduced phagocytosis. Exposure to both LPS and H2O2 in young macrophages invoked the expression of all primary markers of senescence although SASP protein expression was exaggerated in LPS stimulation. Similarly, ROS and NO expression increased while phagocytosis decreased. Stimulation of RAW264.7 cells generally revealed a similar trend although the depth of all measured parameters was ostensibly stronger in young peritoneal macrophages. Among the two stressors, LPS stimulation appeared to be relatively more potent.

Conclusion: Overall, this study emphasizes that LPS exposure to young peritoneal macrophages more strongly recapitulates in vivo cellular senescence in macrophages.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Biology Reports
Molecular Biology Reports 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1048
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Biology Reports publishes original research papers and review articles that demonstrate novel molecular and cellular findings in both eukaryotes (animals, plants, algae, funghi) and prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea).The journal publishes results of both fundamental and translational research as well as new techniques that advance experimental progress in the field and presents original research papers, short communications and (mini-) reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信