Comparison between flattening filter and flattening filter-free photon beams in head and neck cancer patients using volumetric modulated arc therapy technique.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric and clinical outcomes of flattening filter (FF) versus flattening filter-free (FFF) beams in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Twenty-four patients with 70/59.4/54 Gy dose prescribed in 33 fractions with simultaneous integrated boost treatment were retrospectively analyzed to compare treatment delivery efficiency, target coverage, sparing of organs at risk (OARs), and remaining volume at risk (RVR) in two HNC groups (nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal). Study findings indicate that FFF beams significantly reduce conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) by p-values (0.008, < 0.001, 0.002, 0.015) for PTV70 CI, PTV70 HI, PTV60 HI, and PTV54 HI, respectively. Gradient dose was significantly improved in FFF mode, and monitor units (MU) were increased (p < 0.001). In terms of OARs, the study revealed superior performance of FFF in most of structures and RVR especially in the oropharyngeal group. OARs sparing is notably enhanced for structures distant from the target (eyes, lenses, and optic pathway). Additionally, brainstem sparing shows significant improvement in oropharyngeal cases when using FFF plans (p = 0.046); however, FF plans demonstrate superior results in nasopharyngeal cases (p = 0.026). It is concluded that both FF and FFF photon beams are effective for treating HNC patients. VMAT plans using FFF mode offer clinically acceptable outcomes, demonstrating a significant reduction in gradient and integral dose. However, FF plans exhibit superior target homogeneity and reduced MU requirements. Therefore, the choice between these techniques should be based on a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant parameters.