Evaluation of patient comfort and satisfaction after the surgical removal of mandibular impacted molars using a piezo-electric technique: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Q1 Medicine
Khalid Zabin Alotaibi, Waleed Mohammed Al Rasheed, J I N G A D E K R I S H N O J I R A O D A Y A S H A N K A R A Rao, Abdulrahman Altwaijri, Gharam Mefleh Alharbi, Shatha Saleh Aljaber
{"title":"Evaluation of patient comfort and satisfaction after the surgical removal of mandibular impacted molars using a piezo-electric technique: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.","authors":"Khalid Zabin Alotaibi, Waleed Mohammed Al Rasheed, J I N G A D E K R I S H N O J I R A O D A Y A S H A N K A R A Rao, Abdulrahman Altwaijri, Gharam Mefleh Alharbi, Shatha Saleh Aljaber","doi":"10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This is a double clinical trial conducted to study the patient satisfaction and comfort during and after surgical removal of impacted mandibular 3rd molar using Piezo electric tips.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Two groups of 25 each [14 (56 %) males and 11 (44 %) females] and [18 (72 % males and 07 (28 %) females] represented the Rotary and Piezo groups respectively with bilateral impactions. one side of the patient is operated by piezo and the other side by rotary instrument after a gap of 2-3 week between the procedures. The variables considered are pain, swelling, trismus, patient satisfaction and comfort. The readings were taken on base line,3rd day,7th and 14th day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using means and standard deviations for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. The surgery time taken was more in the Piezo group (26.96 ± 12.201) in comparison with the Rotary group (21.32 ± 12.786- (p = 0.011∗). Satisfaction was rated better in the Piezo group (3.18 ± 0.909 vs 2.88 ± 0.881) (p = 0.013∗). Tactile sensation was less in the Piezo group (1.24 ± 0.436) vs (2.28 ± 0.678) (p = 0.001). Less pain was reported in the piezo group patients and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant only during the third day follow up (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall patient satisfaction and comfort was better in piezo in spite of longer duration of surgery. It provides better quality of life as the patients experienced less pain and the total number of analgesics taken is significantly less compared to rotary group.</p>","PeriodicalId":16609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","volume":"15 1","pages":"108-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.12.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This is a double clinical trial conducted to study the patient satisfaction and comfort during and after surgical removal of impacted mandibular 3rd molar using Piezo electric tips.

Material and methods: Two groups of 25 each [14 (56 %) males and 11 (44 %) females] and [18 (72 % males and 07 (28 %) females] represented the Rotary and Piezo groups respectively with bilateral impactions. one side of the patient is operated by piezo and the other side by rotary instrument after a gap of 2-3 week between the procedures. The variables considered are pain, swelling, trismus, patient satisfaction and comfort. The readings were taken on base line,3rd day,7th and 14th day.

Results: Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using means and standard deviations for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. The surgery time taken was more in the Piezo group (26.96 ± 12.201) in comparison with the Rotary group (21.32 ± 12.786- (p = 0.011∗). Satisfaction was rated better in the Piezo group (3.18 ± 0.909 vs 2.88 ± 0.881) (p = 0.013∗). Tactile sensation was less in the Piezo group (1.24 ± 0.436) vs (2.28 ± 0.678) (p = 0.001). Less pain was reported in the piezo group patients and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant only during the third day follow up (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: The overall patient satisfaction and comfort was better in piezo in spite of longer duration of surgery. It provides better quality of life as the patients experienced less pain and the total number of analgesics taken is significantly less compared to rotary group.

使用压电技术去除下颌阻生磨牙后患者舒适度和满意度的评估:一项随机双盲临床试验。
简介:本研究是一项双临床试验,旨在研究使用压电尖牙拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙手术期间和术后患者的满意度和舒适度。材料与方法:双侧嵌塞的Rotary组和Piezo组各25例[男性14例(56%),女性11例(44%)],男性18例(72%),女性07例(28%)]。手术间隔2-3周后,患者的一侧采用压电式手术,另一侧采用旋转式手术。考虑的变量包括疼痛、肿胀、牙关、患者满意度和舒适度。在基线、第3天、第7天和第14天取读数。结果:对连续变量采用均值和标准差,对分类变量采用百分比进行描述性统计分析。结论:尽管手术时间较长,但患者总体满意度和舒适度较好。与旋转组相比,它提供了更好的生活质量,因为患者经历了更少的疼痛,并且服用的镇痛药总数显着减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
167 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (JOBCR)is the official journal of the Craniofacial Research Foundation (CRF). The journal aims to provide a common platform for both clinical and translational research and to promote interdisciplinary sciences in craniofacial region. JOBCR publishes content that includes diseases, injuries and defects in the head, neck, face, jaws and the hard and soft tissues of the mouth and jaws and face region; diagnosis and medical management of diseases specific to the orofacial tissues and of oral manifestations of systemic diseases; studies on identifying populations at risk of oral disease or in need of specific care, and comparing regional, environmental, social, and access similarities and differences in dental care between populations; diseases of the mouth and related structures like salivary glands, temporomandibular joints, facial muscles and perioral skin; biomedical engineering, tissue engineering and stem cells. The journal publishes reviews, commentaries, peer-reviewed original research articles, short communication, and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信