A scoring system to predict resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam in respiratory isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Eda Karadogan, Ahmet Sertcelik, Gulcin Telli Dizman, Hanife Uzar, Gulsen Hazirolan, Banu Cakir, Gokhan Metan
{"title":"A scoring system to predict resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam in respiratory isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.","authors":"Eda Karadogan, Ahmet Sertcelik, Gulcin Telli Dizman, Hanife Uzar, Gulsen Hazirolan, Banu Cakir, Gokhan Metan","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkae476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a scoring system to predict resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from respiratory specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control study was conducted to evaluate the risk factors associated with resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Patients with P. aeruginosa were defined as cases if they had ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant strains, whereas those with ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible strains were defined as test-negative controls. A predictive scoring system based on binary logistic regression coefficients was formulated to predict resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam. The score's performance was assessed using ROC curves and AUC. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the score were determined on the basis of a cut-off point, using the Youden index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance was detected in 18.4% of P. aeruginosa isolates from 473 patients. In multivariate analysis, a history of bronchoscopy [OR (95% CI) = 2.1 (1.1-4.3), P = 0.035], invasive mechanical ventilation [OR (95% CI) = 2.4 (1.2-4.5), P = 0.009], colistin/polymyxin B use [OR (95% CI) = 3.2 (1.8-5.7), P < 0.001] and fluoroquinolone use [OR (95% CI) = 2.3 (1.1-4.8), P = 0.024] in the preceding month prior to P. aeruginosa isolation were significantly associated with ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance. The AUC (95% CI) of the score was 0.734 (0.675-0.794), with a sensitivity of 69%, specificity of 71.8%, positive predictive value of 35.5% and negative predictive value of 91.1% at the cut-off point of 2, out of a range of 0-5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In respiratory tract infections caused by P. aeruginosa, use of the proposed scoring system may reduce inappropriate use of ceftolozane/tazobactam in empirical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a scoring system to predict resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from respiratory specimens.

Methods: A case-control study was conducted to evaluate the risk factors associated with resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Patients with P. aeruginosa were defined as cases if they had ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant strains, whereas those with ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible strains were defined as test-negative controls. A predictive scoring system based on binary logistic regression coefficients was formulated to predict resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam. The score's performance was assessed using ROC curves and AUC. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the score were determined on the basis of a cut-off point, using the Youden index.

Results: Ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance was detected in 18.4% of P. aeruginosa isolates from 473 patients. In multivariate analysis, a history of bronchoscopy [OR (95% CI) = 2.1 (1.1-4.3), P = 0.035], invasive mechanical ventilation [OR (95% CI) = 2.4 (1.2-4.5), P = 0.009], colistin/polymyxin B use [OR (95% CI) = 3.2 (1.8-5.7), P < 0.001] and fluoroquinolone use [OR (95% CI) = 2.3 (1.1-4.8), P = 0.024] in the preceding month prior to P. aeruginosa isolation were significantly associated with ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance. The AUC (95% CI) of the score was 0.734 (0.675-0.794), with a sensitivity of 69%, specificity of 71.8%, positive predictive value of 35.5% and negative predictive value of 91.1% at the cut-off point of 2, out of a range of 0-5.

Conclusions: In respiratory tract infections caused by P. aeruginosa, use of the proposed scoring system may reduce inappropriate use of ceftolozane/tazobactam in empirical treatment.

铜绿假单胞菌呼吸道分离株对头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦耐药的预测评分系统。
目的:建立一种预测呼吸标本中铜绿假单胞菌对头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦耐药的评分系统。方法:采用病例对照研究,评价头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦耐药的相关危险因素。铜绿假单胞菌患者如果有头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦耐药菌株被定义为病例,而头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦敏感菌株被定义为检测阴性对照。建立了基于二元logistic回归系数的预测评分系统来预测头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦的耐药性。采用ROC曲线和AUC评价评分的表现。采用约登指数(Youden index),根据分界点确定评分的敏感性、特异性和预测值。结果:473例铜绿假单胞菌中有18.4%对头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦耐药。在多因素分析中,支气管镜病史[OR (95% CI) = 2.1 (1.1-4.3), P = 0.035],有创机械通气[OR (95% CI) = 2.4 (1.2-4.5), P = 0.009],粘菌素/多粘菌素B使用[OR (95% CI) = 3.2 (1.8-5.7), P结论:在铜绿假单胞菌引起的呼吸道感染中,使用所提出的评分系统可减少经验治疗中不适当使用头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信