Safety and Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in General Surgery.

IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Lily J Park, Maura Marcucci, Sandra N Ofori, Flavia K Borges, Rahima Nenshi, Charlotte Tiffanie Bendtz Kanstrup, Michael Rosen, Giovanni Landoni, Vladimir Lomivorotov, Thomas W Painter, Denis Xavier, Maria Jose Martinez-Zapata, Wojciech Szczeklik, Christian S Meyhoff, Matthew T V Chan, Marko Simunovic, Jessica Bogach, Pablo E Serrano, Kumar Balasubramanian, Margherita Cadeddu, Ilun Yang, Won Ho Kim, P J Devereaux
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in General Surgery.","authors":"Lily J Park, Maura Marcucci, Sandra N Ofori, Flavia K Borges, Rahima Nenshi, Charlotte Tiffanie Bendtz Kanstrup, Michael Rosen, Giovanni Landoni, Vladimir Lomivorotov, Thomas W Painter, Denis Xavier, Maria Jose Martinez-Zapata, Wojciech Szczeklik, Christian S Meyhoff, Matthew T V Chan, Marko Simunovic, Jessica Bogach, Pablo E Serrano, Kumar Balasubramanian, Margherita Cadeddu, Ilun Yang, Won Ho Kim, P J Devereaux","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Perioperative bleeding is common in general surgery. The POISE-3 (Perioperative Ischemic Evaluation-3) trial demonstrated efficacy of prophylactic tranexamic acid (TXA) compared with placebo in preventing major bleeding without increasing vascular outcomes in noncardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the safety and efficacy of prophylactic TXA, specifically in general surgery.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Subgroup analyses were conducted that compared randomized treatment with TXA vs placebo according to whether patients underwent general surgery or nongeneral surgery in the POISE-3 blinded, international, multicenter randomized clinical trial. Participants were 45 years or older, were undergoing noncardiac surgery, had increased cardiovascular risk, and were expected to require at least an overnight hospital admission after surgery. Among 26 581 eligible patients identified, 17 046 were excluded, resulting in 9535 patients randomized to the POISE-3 trial. Participants were enrolled from June 2018 through July 2021. The data were analyzed during December 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Prophylactic, 1-g bolus of intravenous TXA or placebo at the start and end of surgery.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of life-threatening bleeding, major bleeding, or bleeding into a critical organ. The primary safety outcome was a composite of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, nonhemorrhagic stroke, peripheral arterial thrombosis, or symptomatic proximal venous thromboembolism at 30 days. Cox proportional hazards models were conducted, incorporating tests of interaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9535 POISE-3 participants, 3260 underwent a general surgery procedure. Mean age was 68.6 (SD, 9.6) years, 1740 were male (53.4%), and 1520 were female (46.6%). Among general surgery patients, 8.0% and 10.5% in the TXA and placebo groups, respectively, had the primary efficacy outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.93; P = .01) and 11.9% and 12.5% in the TXA and placebo groups, respectively, had the primary safety outcome (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.78-1.16; P = .63). There was no significant interaction by type of surgery (general surgery vs nongeneral surgery) on the primary efficacy (P for interaction = .81) and safety (P for interaction = .37) outcomes. Across subtypes of general surgery, TXA decreased the composite bleeding outcome in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.91 [n = 332]) and colorectal surgery (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.98 [n = 940]). There was no significant interaction across subtypes of general surgery (P for interaction = .68).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, TXA significantly reduced the risk of perioperative bleeding without increasing cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing general surgery procedures.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03505723.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Perioperative bleeding is common in general surgery. The POISE-3 (Perioperative Ischemic Evaluation-3) trial demonstrated efficacy of prophylactic tranexamic acid (TXA) compared with placebo in preventing major bleeding without increasing vascular outcomes in noncardiac surgery.

Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of prophylactic TXA, specifically in general surgery.

Design, setting, and participants: Subgroup analyses were conducted that compared randomized treatment with TXA vs placebo according to whether patients underwent general surgery or nongeneral surgery in the POISE-3 blinded, international, multicenter randomized clinical trial. Participants were 45 years or older, were undergoing noncardiac surgery, had increased cardiovascular risk, and were expected to require at least an overnight hospital admission after surgery. Among 26 581 eligible patients identified, 17 046 were excluded, resulting in 9535 patients randomized to the POISE-3 trial. Participants were enrolled from June 2018 through July 2021. The data were analyzed during December 2023.

Intervention: Prophylactic, 1-g bolus of intravenous TXA or placebo at the start and end of surgery.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of life-threatening bleeding, major bleeding, or bleeding into a critical organ. The primary safety outcome was a composite of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, nonhemorrhagic stroke, peripheral arterial thrombosis, or symptomatic proximal venous thromboembolism at 30 days. Cox proportional hazards models were conducted, incorporating tests of interaction.

Results: Among 9535 POISE-3 participants, 3260 underwent a general surgery procedure. Mean age was 68.6 (SD, 9.6) years, 1740 were male (53.4%), and 1520 were female (46.6%). Among general surgery patients, 8.0% and 10.5% in the TXA and placebo groups, respectively, had the primary efficacy outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.93; P = .01) and 11.9% and 12.5% in the TXA and placebo groups, respectively, had the primary safety outcome (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.78-1.16; P = .63). There was no significant interaction by type of surgery (general surgery vs nongeneral surgery) on the primary efficacy (P for interaction = .81) and safety (P for interaction = .37) outcomes. Across subtypes of general surgery, TXA decreased the composite bleeding outcome in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.91 [n = 332]) and colorectal surgery (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.98 [n = 940]). There was no significant interaction across subtypes of general surgery (P for interaction = .68).

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, TXA significantly reduced the risk of perioperative bleeding without increasing cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing general surgery procedures.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03505723.

氨甲环酸在普通外科中的安全性和有效性。
重要性:围手术期出血在普通外科手术中很常见。pase -3(围手术期缺血评估-3)试验表明,与安慰剂相比,预防性氨甲环酸(TXA)在预防非心脏手术中大出血而不增加血管结局方面的疗效。目的:探讨预防性TXA在普外科手术中的安全性和有效性。设计、环境和参与者:在pse -3盲法、国际多中心随机临床试验中,根据患者是否接受普通手术或非普通手术,对TXA和安慰剂的随机治疗进行亚组分析。参与者年龄在45岁或以上,正在接受非心脏手术,心血管风险增加,预计术后至少需要住院过夜。在26 581例符合条件的患者中,17 046例被排除,9535例患者被随机分配到pse -3试验中。参与者从2018年6月到2021年7月注册。这些数据是在2023年12月分析的。干预:预防性,在手术开始和结束时静脉注射1克TXA或安慰剂。主要结局和指标:主要疗效结局为危及生命的出血、大出血或出血进入关键器官的综合结局。主要安全性指标为30天非心脏手术后心肌损伤、非出血性卒中、外周动脉血栓形成或症状性近端静脉血栓栓塞。采用Cox比例风险模型,纳入相互作用检验。结果:9535名pse -3参与者中,3260名接受了普通外科手术。平均年龄68.6 (SD, 9.6)岁,男性1740人(53.4%),女性1520人(46.6%)。在普外科患者中,TXA组和安慰剂组的主要疗效结局分别为8.0%和10.5%(风险比[HR], 0.74;95% ci, 0.59-0.93;P = 0.01), TXA组和安慰剂组分别为11.9%和12.5%,具有主要安全结局(HR, 0.95;95% ci, 0.78-1.16;p = .63)。手术类型(普通手术与非普通手术)在主要疗效(相互作用P = 0.81)和安全性(相互作用P = 0.37)结果上没有显著的相互作用。在普通手术亚型中,TXA降低了肝胰胆道手术的复合出血结局(HR, 0.55;95% CI, 0.34-0.91 [n = 332])和结直肠手术(HR, 0.67;95% CI, 0.45-0.98 [n = 940])。普外科各亚型间无显著相互作用(相互作用P = 0.68)。结论和相关性:在这项研究中,TXA显著降低了接受普通外科手术的患者围手术期出血的风险,而不增加心血管风险。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03505723。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信