Person-Specific Analyses of Smartphone Use and Mental Health: Intensive Longitudinal Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Merve Cerit, Angela Y Lee, Jeffrey Hancock, Adam Miner, Mu-Jung Cho, Daniel Muise, Anna-Angelina Garròn Torres, Nick Haber, Nilam Ram, Thomas N Robinson, Byron Reeves
{"title":"Person-Specific Analyses of Smartphone Use and Mental Health: Intensive Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Merve Cerit, Angela Y Lee, Jeffrey Hancock, Adam Miner, Mu-Jung Cho, Daniel Muise, Anna-Angelina Garròn Torres, Nick Haber, Nilam Ram, Thomas N Robinson, Byron Reeves","doi":"10.2196/59875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contrary to popular concerns about the harmful effects of media use on mental health, research on this relationship is ambiguous, stalling advances in theory, interventions, and policy. Scientific explorations of the relationship between media and mental health have mostly been found null or have small associations, with the results often blamed on the use of cross-sectional study designs or imprecise measures of media use and mental health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This exploratory empirical demonstration aims to answer whether mental health effects are associated with media use experiences by (1) redirecting research investments to granular and intensive longitudinal recordings of digital experiences to build models of media use and mental health for single individuals over the course of 1 year, (2) using new metrics of fragmented media use to propose explanations of mental health effects that will advance person-specific theorizing in media psychology, and (3) identifying combinations of media behaviors and mental health symptoms that may be more useful for studying media effects than single measures of dosage and affect or assessments of clinical symptoms related to specific disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The activity on individuals' smartphone screens was recorded every 5 seconds when devices were in use over 1 year, resulting in a dataset of 6,744,013 screenshots and 123 fortnightly surveys from 5 adult participants. Each participant contributed between 0.8 and 2.7 million screens. Six media use metrics were derived from smartphone metadata. Fortnightly surveys captured symptoms of depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, state anxiety, and positive affect. Idiographic filter models (p-technique canonical correlation analyses) were applied to explore person-specific associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Canonical correlations revealed substantial person-specific associations between media use and mental health, ranging from r=0.82 (P=.008) to r=0.92 (P=.03). The specific combinations of media use metrics and mental health dimensions were different for each person, reflecting significant individual variability. For instance, the media use canonical variate for 1 participant was characterized by higher loadings for app-switching, which, in combination with other behaviors, correlated strongly with a mental health variate emphasizing anxiety symptoms. For another, prolonged screen time, alongside other media use behaviors, contributed to a mental health variate weighted more heavily toward depression symptoms. These within-person correlations are among the strongest reported in this literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that the relationships between media use and mental health are highly individualized, with implications for the development of personalized models and precision smartphone-informed interventions in mental health. We discuss how our approach can be extended generally, while still emphasizing the importance of idiographic approaches. This study highlights the potential for granular, longitudinal data to reveal person-specific patterns that can inform theory development, personalized screening, diagnosis, and interventions in mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":" ","pages":"e59875"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contrary to popular concerns about the harmful effects of media use on mental health, research on this relationship is ambiguous, stalling advances in theory, interventions, and policy. Scientific explorations of the relationship between media and mental health have mostly been found null or have small associations, with the results often blamed on the use of cross-sectional study designs or imprecise measures of media use and mental health.

Objective: This exploratory empirical demonstration aims to answer whether mental health effects are associated with media use experiences by (1) redirecting research investments to granular and intensive longitudinal recordings of digital experiences to build models of media use and mental health for single individuals over the course of 1 year, (2) using new metrics of fragmented media use to propose explanations of mental health effects that will advance person-specific theorizing in media psychology, and (3) identifying combinations of media behaviors and mental health symptoms that may be more useful for studying media effects than single measures of dosage and affect or assessments of clinical symptoms related to specific disorders.

Methods: The activity on individuals' smartphone screens was recorded every 5 seconds when devices were in use over 1 year, resulting in a dataset of 6,744,013 screenshots and 123 fortnightly surveys from 5 adult participants. Each participant contributed between 0.8 and 2.7 million screens. Six media use metrics were derived from smartphone metadata. Fortnightly surveys captured symptoms of depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, state anxiety, and positive affect. Idiographic filter models (p-technique canonical correlation analyses) were applied to explore person-specific associations.

Results: Canonical correlations revealed substantial person-specific associations between media use and mental health, ranging from r=0.82 (P=.008) to r=0.92 (P=.03). The specific combinations of media use metrics and mental health dimensions were different for each person, reflecting significant individual variability. For instance, the media use canonical variate for 1 participant was characterized by higher loadings for app-switching, which, in combination with other behaviors, correlated strongly with a mental health variate emphasizing anxiety symptoms. For another, prolonged screen time, alongside other media use behaviors, contributed to a mental health variate weighted more heavily toward depression symptoms. These within-person correlations are among the strongest reported in this literature.

Conclusions: Results suggest that the relationships between media use and mental health are highly individualized, with implications for the development of personalized models and precision smartphone-informed interventions in mental health. We discuss how our approach can be extended generally, while still emphasizing the importance of idiographic approaches. This study highlights the potential for granular, longitudinal data to reveal person-specific patterns that can inform theory development, personalized screening, diagnosis, and interventions in mental health.

智能手机使用与心理健康的个体分析:一项为期一年的密集纵向研究。
背景:与大众对媒体使用对心理健康有害影响的担忧相反,对这一关系的研究是模糊的,阻碍了理论、干预和政策的进展。对媒体和心理健康之间关系的科学探索大多发现了零关联或很小的关联,其结果往往归咎于使用横断面研究设计或对媒体使用和心理健康的不精确测量。摘要目的:这一探索性实证论证旨在回答心理健康影响是否与媒体使用体验有关,方法是:(1)将研究投资转向对数字体验的细粒度和密集纵向记录,以建立一整年时间内单个个体的媒体使用和心理健康模型;(2)使用碎片化媒体使用的新指标来提出对心理健康影响的解释,这将推进媒体心理学中针对个人的理论化;(3)识别媒体行为和心理健康症状的组合,这可能比单一的剂量和影响测量或评估与特定疾病相关的临床症状更有助于研究媒体影响。方法:在使用智能手机一年内,每隔5秒记录一次个人智能手机屏幕上的活动,产生一个数据集,包括6,744,013张截图和来自5名成人参与者的123份每两周的调查。每个参与者贡献了80万到270万个屏幕。媒体使用指标来源于智能手机元数据。每两周的调查记录了抑郁、多动症、状态焦虑和积极情绪的症状。具体过滤模型(p-技术典型相关分析)被用于探索个人特异性关联。结果:典型相关性显示媒体使用与心理健康之间存在显著的个体特异性关联,范围从r = 0.82 (P = 0.008)到r = 0.92 (P = 0.031)。媒体使用指标和心理健康维度的具体组合对每个人来说都是不同的,反映了显著的个体差异。例如,一个参与者的媒体使用规范变量的特征是更高的应用程序切换负荷,这与其他行为结合起来,与强调焦虑症状的心理健康变量密切相关。另一方面,长时间看屏幕,以及其他媒体使用行为,导致心理健康变量更倾向于抑郁症状。这些人际关系是本文献中最强的报道之一。结论:结果表明,媒体使用与心理健康之间的关系是高度个性化的,这对开发个性化模型和精确的智能手机心理健康干预措施具有重要意义。我们讨论了如何将我们的方法扩展到一般情况,同时仍然强调具体方法的重要性。这项研究强调了细粒度、纵向数据揭示个人特定模式的潜力,这些模式可以为心理健康的理论发展、个性化筛查、诊断和干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信