Cross-Validating the Electrophysiological Markers of Early Face Categorization.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Print Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0317-24.2024
Fazilet Zeynep Yildirim-Keles, Lisa Stacchi, Roberto Caldara
{"title":"Cross-Validating the Electrophysiological Markers of Early Face Categorization.","authors":"Fazilet Zeynep Yildirim-Keles, Lisa Stacchi, Roberto Caldara","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0317-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human face categorization has been extensively studied using event-related potentials (ERPs), positing the N170 ERP component as a robust neural marker of face categorization. Recently, the fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) approach relying on steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) has also been used to investigate face categorization. FPVS studies consistently report strong bilateral SSVEP face categorization responses over the occipitotemporal cortex, with a right hemispheric dominance, closely mirroring the N170 scalp topography. However, it remains unclear whether SSVEP responses can be considered a proxy for the N170 or are driven by different components. To address this question, we recorded electrophysiological signals from observers viewing face and object images during FPVS and ERP paradigms. We quantified the FPVS response in the frequency domain and extracted ERP components, including the P1, N170, and P2, from both the FPVS time domain and ERP paradigms. Our results revealed little relationship between any single ERP component and the FPVS frequency response. Only the peak-to-peak differences between N170 and P2 components consistently explained the FPVS frequency response. Our data show that the FPVS frequency response reflects a later complex neural integration rather than any isolated ERP component, such as the N170. These findings raise important methodological and theoretical considerations regarding the relationship between SSVEPs and transient ERPs. While both markers are indicative of human face categorization, they appear to capture different stages of this cognitive process.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0317-24.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human face categorization has been extensively studied using event-related potentials (ERPs), positing the N170 ERP component as a robust neural marker of face categorization. Recently, the fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) approach relying on steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) has also been used to investigate face categorization. FPVS studies consistently report strong bilateral SSVEP face categorization responses over the occipitotemporal cortex, with a right hemispheric dominance, closely mirroring the N170 scalp topography. However, it remains unclear whether SSVEP responses can be considered a proxy for the N170 or are driven by different components. To address this question, we recorded electrophysiological signals from observers viewing face and object images during FPVS and ERP paradigms. We quantified the FPVS response in the frequency domain and extracted ERP components, including the P1, N170, and P2, from both the FPVS time domain and ERP paradigms. Our results revealed little relationship between any single ERP component and the FPVS frequency response. Only the peak-to-peak differences between N170 and P2 components consistently explained the FPVS frequency response. Our data show that the FPVS frequency response reflects a later complex neural integration rather than any isolated ERP component, such as the N170. These findings raise important methodological and theoretical considerations regarding the relationship between SSVEPs and transient ERPs. While both markers are indicative of human face categorization, they appear to capture different stages of this cognitive process.

交叉验证早期面部分类的电生理标记。
使用事件相关电位(ERP)对人脸分类进行了广泛的研究,认为N170 ERP成分是人脸分类的一个强大的神经标记。近年来,基于稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEPs)的快速周期视觉刺激(FPVS)方法也被用于研究人脸分类。FPVS研究一致报告了强烈的双侧SSVEP面部分类反应在枕颞皮层,以右半球为主导,密切反映了N170头皮地形。然而,目前尚不清楚SSVEP反应是否可以被认为是N170的代理,还是由不同的成分驱动。为了解决这个问题,我们记录了观察者在FPVS和ERP范式中观看人脸和物体图像的电生理信号。我们量化了FPVS的频域响应,并从FPVS时域和ERP范式中提取了ERP分量,包括P1、N170和P2。我们的研究结果显示,任何单一的ERP成分与FPVS频率响应之间的关系都很小。只有N170和P2分量之间的峰间差异才能一致地解释FPVS的频率响应。我们的数据表明,FPVS频率响应反映的是后期复杂的神经整合,而不是任何孤立的ERP组件,如N170。这些发现提出了关于ssvep和瞬态erp之间关系的重要方法和理论考虑。虽然这两种标记都表明了人脸分类,但它们似乎捕捉到了这一认知过程的不同阶段。我们的研究解开了面部分类的电生理神经反应的本质。我们记录了人类观察者的稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEPs)和瞬态事件相关电位(ERP),并进行了直接比较。与ssvep与早期N170 ERP成分相关的假设相反,我们发现N170- p2差异始终与ssvep相关。这一发现表明,快速周期性视觉刺激(FPVS)中的ssvep可能反映了神经处理的后期阶段。我们的研究结果在解释SSVEP反应时需要谨慎,避免过早地假设它们与erp的关系。这项工作强调需要综合研究方法来更好地理解ssvep和erp在不同认知领域之间的复杂相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信