{"title":"The association between immunoinflammatory biomarkers NLR, PLR, LMR and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yunyi Yang, Xiaoli He, Shufa Tan, Xiaoxiao Qu, Weijin Huang, Jiayuan Cai, Jiawen You, Xinyi Fu, Yanming He, Hongjie Yang","doi":"10.1007/s10238-024-01539-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic liver disorder closely linked to metabolic syndrome. Identifying novel, easily measurable biomarkers could significantly enhance the diagnosis and management of NAFLD in clinical settings. Recent studies suggest that immunoinflammatory biomarkers-specifically, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR)-may offer diagnostic value for NAFLD. However, the effectiveness of these biomarkers has not been comprehensively assessed in this patient population. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between these immunoinflammatory biomarkers and NAFLD. As of August 8, 2024, databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched to compare NLR, PLR, and LMR levels in NAFLD patients and healthy controls. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated (PROSPERO registry number: CRD42024580812). A total of 20 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results indicated that NAFLD patients had significantly higher NLR levels (SMD = 0.43; 95% CI 0.28-0.58; p < 0.001) and lower PLR levels (SMD = - 0.29; 95% CI - 0.41 to - 0.17; p < 0.001) compared to controls. However, no significant difference in LMR was observed between NAFLD patients and controls(SMD = 0.08; 95% CI - 0.00 to 0.17; p = 0.051). These findings suggest that NLR and PLR may hold promise as diagnostic markers for NAFLD, while LMR appears to have limited diagnostic utility. Further research is warranted to explore the potential role of these biomarkers in tracking disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-024-01539-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic liver disorder closely linked to metabolic syndrome. Identifying novel, easily measurable biomarkers could significantly enhance the diagnosis and management of NAFLD in clinical settings. Recent studies suggest that immunoinflammatory biomarkers-specifically, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR)-may offer diagnostic value for NAFLD. However, the effectiveness of these biomarkers has not been comprehensively assessed in this patient population. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between these immunoinflammatory biomarkers and NAFLD. As of August 8, 2024, databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched to compare NLR, PLR, and LMR levels in NAFLD patients and healthy controls. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated (PROSPERO registry number: CRD42024580812). A total of 20 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results indicated that NAFLD patients had significantly higher NLR levels (SMD = 0.43; 95% CI 0.28-0.58; p < 0.001) and lower PLR levels (SMD = - 0.29; 95% CI - 0.41 to - 0.17; p < 0.001) compared to controls. However, no significant difference in LMR was observed between NAFLD patients and controls(SMD = 0.08; 95% CI - 0.00 to 0.17; p = 0.051). These findings suggest that NLR and PLR may hold promise as diagnostic markers for NAFLD, while LMR appears to have limited diagnostic utility. Further research is warranted to explore the potential role of these biomarkers in tracking disease progression.
非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是一种与代谢综合征密切相关的慢性肝病。识别新的,易于测量的生物标志物可以显著提高临床环境中NAFLD的诊断和管理。最近的研究表明,免疫炎症生物标志物-特别是中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR),血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)和淋巴细胞与单核细胞比率(LMR)-可能对NAFLD提供诊断价值。然而,这些生物标志物在该患者群体中的有效性尚未得到全面评估。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估这些免疫炎症生物标志物与NAFLD之间的关系。截至2024年8月8日,我们系统地检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Scopus等数据库,比较NAFLD患者和健康对照组的NLR、PLR和LMR水平。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量,并计算95%置信间隔(ci)的标准化平均差(SMDs) (PROSPERO登记号:CRD42024580812)。meta分析共纳入20项研究。结果显示,NAFLD患者NLR水平明显高于NAFLD患者(SMD = 0.43;95% ci 0.28-0.58;p
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.