Association of Right Bundle Branch Block with Ischemic Stroke Incidence: A UK Biobank Cohort Study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dougho Park, Sopheak Phoung, Phoeuk Borei, Myeonghwan Bang, Seungsoo Kim, Yousin Suh, Hyoung Seop Kim, Jong Hun Kim
{"title":"Association of Right Bundle Branch Block with Ischemic Stroke Incidence: A UK Biobank Cohort Study.","authors":"Dougho Park, Sopheak Phoung, Phoeuk Borei, Myeonghwan Bang, Seungsoo Kim, Yousin Suh, Hyoung Seop Kim, Jong Hun Kim","doi":"10.1159/000543258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is often considered benign; however, its association with ischemic stroke (IS) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the relationship between RBBB and the incidence of IS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the UK Biobank database (2004-2021), which included 3,634 participants with new-onset RBBB and 3,643 matched controls. The primary outcome was the incidence of IS, while the secondary outcomes included atrial fibrillation (AF) and all-cause mortality. We applied a propensity score matching with variables such as age, sex, presence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Subsequently, time-dependent Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the association between RBBB and the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative incidence of IS was higher in the RBBB group. RBBB was independently associated with an increased risk of IS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.12-6.03; p < 0.001), as well as AF (aHR, 4.58; 95% CI, 3.86-5.43; p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (aHR, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.35-3.02; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RBBB was associated with an increased risk of IS, independent of age, sex, and other comorbidities. These findings emphasize the need for careful monitoring and management of patients with RBBB to mitigate the risk of IS and other adverse outcomes. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and better inform clinical management strategies for patients with RBBB.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is often considered benign; however, its association with ischemic stroke (IS) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the relationship between RBBB and the incidence of IS.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the UK Biobank database (2004-2021), which included 3,634 participants with new-onset RBBB and 3,643 matched controls. The primary outcome was the incidence of IS, while the secondary outcomes included atrial fibrillation (AF) and all-cause mortality. We applied a propensity score matching with variables such as age, sex, presence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Subsequently, time-dependent Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the association between RBBB and the outcomes.

Results: The cumulative incidence of IS was higher in the RBBB group. RBBB was independently associated with an increased risk of IS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.12-6.03; p < 0.001), as well as AF (aHR, 4.58; 95% CI, 3.86-5.43; p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (aHR, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.35-3.02; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: RBBB was associated with an increased risk of IS, independent of age, sex, and other comorbidities. These findings emphasize the need for careful monitoring and management of patients with RBBB to mitigate the risk of IS and other adverse outcomes. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and better inform clinical management strategies for patients with RBBB.

右束支传导阻滞与缺血性卒中发生率的关联:英国生物库队列研究。
右束分支阻滞(RBBB)通常被认为是良性的;然而,其与缺血性卒中(IS)的关系尚不清楚。我们的目的是探讨RBBB与IS发病率之间的关系。方法:我们使用英国生物银行数据库(2004-2021)进行了一项回顾性队列研究,其中包括3,634名新发RBBB患者和3,643名匹配对照。主要结局是IS的发生率,次要结局包括心房颤动(AF)和全因死亡率。我们应用了与年龄、性别、高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常和Charlson合并症指数等变量匹配的倾向评分。随后,进行了时间相关的Cox回归分析,以评估RBBB与结果之间的关系。结果:RBBB组IS累积发生率较高。RBBB与IS风险增加独立相关(调整风险比[aHR], 3.57;95%置信区间[CI], 2.12-6.03;p < 0.001),以及AF (aHR, 4.58;95% ci, 3.86-5.43;p < 0.001)和全因死亡率(aHR, 2.66;95% ci, 2.35-3.02;P < 0.001)。结论:RBBB与IS风险增加相关,与年龄、性别和其他合并症无关。这些发现强调需要仔细监测和管理RBBB患者,以减轻IS和其他不良后果的风险。需要进一步的研究来阐明潜在的机制,并更好地为RBBB患者的临床管理策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Cerebrovascular Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信