Conceptualization of pain in Croatian adults: a cross-sectional and psychometric study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Croatian Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-30
Snježana Schuster, Iva Lončarić Kelečić, Morana Bilić, Margareta Begić, Joshua W Pate
{"title":"Conceptualization of pain in Croatian adults: a cross-sectional and psychometric study.","authors":"Snježana Schuster, Iva Lončarić Kelečić, Morana Bilić, Margareta Begić, Joshua W Pate","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To ascertain whether Croatian respondents' knowledge on pain aligns with modern pain science, and determine the measurement properties of the Croatian version of the Concept of Pain Inventory for Adults (COPI-Adult).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, online survey was used to collect the respondents' sociodemographic, clinical, and COPI-Adult (CRO) data (n = 509). A Pearson correlation coefficient test was used to assess the correlations between sociodemographic, clinical, and COPI-Adult (CRO) data. Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's coefficient, based on classical test theory, were used to determine the measurement properties of the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average COPI-Adult (CRO) score was 35.91 ± 5.8 out of 52 and it was similar in respondents with (36.52±6.01) and without (35.36±5.57) formal medical/health care education. Respondents exhibited a reductionist understanding of pain as a result of structural damage. Higher COPI-Adult scores were very weakly correlated with formal medical/health care education, younger age, lower pain intensity, higher pain knowledge self-assessment, and higher education level. Formal medical education significantly moderately correlated with pain knowledge self-assessment (r=-0.425; P<0.001). One-factor COPI-Adult (CRO) model revealed significant factor loadings of each item (P<0.001) and good internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.803).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Croatian respondents' concept of pain aligns with their objective knowledge, but only partially with modern pain science. This indicates the need to bridge the gap between traditional and contemporary understandings of pain in the Croatian population. One-factor COPI-Adult (CRO) inventory serves as the first questionnaire for assessing the concept of pain among Croatian adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":10796,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Medical Journal","volume":"65 6","pages":"473-482"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To ascertain whether Croatian respondents' knowledge on pain aligns with modern pain science, and determine the measurement properties of the Croatian version of the Concept of Pain Inventory for Adults (COPI-Adult).

Methods: A cross-sectional, online survey was used to collect the respondents' sociodemographic, clinical, and COPI-Adult (CRO) data (n = 509). A Pearson correlation coefficient test was used to assess the correlations between sociodemographic, clinical, and COPI-Adult (CRO) data. Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's coefficient, based on classical test theory, were used to determine the measurement properties of the questionnaire.

Results: The average COPI-Adult (CRO) score was 35.91 ± 5.8 out of 52 and it was similar in respondents with (36.52±6.01) and without (35.36±5.57) formal medical/health care education. Respondents exhibited a reductionist understanding of pain as a result of structural damage. Higher COPI-Adult scores were very weakly correlated with formal medical/health care education, younger age, lower pain intensity, higher pain knowledge self-assessment, and higher education level. Formal medical education significantly moderately correlated with pain knowledge self-assessment (r=-0.425; P<0.001). One-factor COPI-Adult (CRO) model revealed significant factor loadings of each item (P<0.001) and good internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.803).

Conclusions: Croatian respondents' concept of pain aligns with their objective knowledge, but only partially with modern pain science. This indicates the need to bridge the gap between traditional and contemporary understandings of pain in the Croatian population. One-factor COPI-Adult (CRO) inventory serves as the first questionnaire for assessing the concept of pain among Croatian adults.

克罗地亚成人疼痛的概念化:一项横断面和心理测量学研究。
目的:确定克罗地亚受访者的疼痛知识是否与现代疼痛科学一致,并确定克罗地亚版本的成人疼痛量表(COPI-Adult)的测量属性。方法:采用横断面在线调查收集调查对象的社会人口学、临床和COPI-Adult (CRO)数据(n = 509)。使用Pearson相关系数检验来评估社会人口学、临床和COPI-Adult (CRO)数据之间的相关性。基于经典检验理论,采用验证性因子分析和Cronbach系数来确定问卷的测量性质。结果:COPI-Adult (CRO)平均得分为35.91±5.8分(满分52分),接受过正规医疗卫生教育(36.52±6.01分)和未接受正规医疗卫生教育(35.36±5.57分)的调查对象的CRO得分相近。被调查者表现出对结构损伤导致的疼痛的简化理解。COPI-Adult评分较高与接受正规医疗卫生教育、年龄较小、疼痛强度较低、疼痛知识自我评价较高、受教育程度较高呈极弱相关。正规医学教育与疼痛知识自我评价呈显著中相关(r=-0.425;结论:克罗地亚受访者的疼痛概念与他们的客观知识一致,但只有部分与现代疼痛科学。这表明有必要弥合对克罗地亚人民痛苦的传统和现代理解之间的差距。单因素COPI-Adult (CRO)量表作为评估克罗地亚成年人疼痛概念的第一份问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Croatian Medical Journal
Croatian Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) is an international peer reviewed journal open to scientists from all fields of biomedicine and health related research. Although CMJ welcomes all contributions that increase and expand on medical knowledge, the two areas are of the special interest: topics globally relevant for biomedicine and health and medicine in developing and emerging countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信