Coping flexibility and associated factors after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: A cross-sectional multisite study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Miwako Eto , Sena Yamamoto , Ryohei Kawabata , Tamon Miyanaga , Noriko Iga , Aoi Yoshino , Hiroshi Yamada , Yoko Nishitani , Mami Matsunaga , Harue Arao
{"title":"Coping flexibility and associated factors after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: A cross-sectional multisite study","authors":"Miwako Eto ,&nbsp;Sena Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Ryohei Kawabata ,&nbsp;Tamon Miyanaga ,&nbsp;Noriko Iga ,&nbsp;Aoi Yoshino ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Yamada ,&nbsp;Yoko Nishitani ,&nbsp;Mami Matsunaga ,&nbsp;Harue Arao","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To elucidate the current state of coping flexibility and associated factors in gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional multisite study was conducted with 142 patients with gastric cancer who completed questionnaires on coping flexibility, postgastrectomy dysfunction, health literacy, and perceived social support. Coping flexibility was measured using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised, which includes three subscales: Abandonment Coping (i.e., abandoning ineffective coping strategies), Re-Coping (i.e., assessing the process of developing and implementing alternative coping strategies), and Meta-Coping (i.e., monitoring coping flexibility process). Higher scores indicate greater coping flexibility. Descriptive statistics and univariable and multivariable logistic analyses were conducted to examine factors associated with coping flexibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age of the participants was 72.6 (± 10.5) years. Limited activity due to decreased food consumption was associated with lower scores for Abandonment Coping (odds ratio [OR]: 0.4; <em>P</em> ​= ​0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2–0.9) and Re-Coping (OR: 0.3; <em>P</em> ​= ​0.003; 95% CI, 0.1–0.6). Higher levels of communicative health literacy were associated with higher Abandonment Coping scores (OR: 1.1; <em>P</em> ​= ​0.04; 95% CI, 1.0–1.3), and higher levels of critical health literacy were associated with higher Re-Coping scores (OR: 1.2; <em>P</em> ​= ​0.03; 95% CI, 1.0–1.3).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Limited activity due to decreased food consumption and limited coping flexibility were significantly associated. Health literacy had an important role in facilitating coping flexibility. Nursing support may be crucial in evaluating coping strategies and developing alternatives based on new information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S234756252400249X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To elucidate the current state of coping flexibility and associated factors in gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy.

Methods

A cross-sectional multisite study was conducted with 142 patients with gastric cancer who completed questionnaires on coping flexibility, postgastrectomy dysfunction, health literacy, and perceived social support. Coping flexibility was measured using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised, which includes three subscales: Abandonment Coping (i.e., abandoning ineffective coping strategies), Re-Coping (i.e., assessing the process of developing and implementing alternative coping strategies), and Meta-Coping (i.e., monitoring coping flexibility process). Higher scores indicate greater coping flexibility. Descriptive statistics and univariable and multivariable logistic analyses were conducted to examine factors associated with coping flexibility.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 72.6 (± 10.5) years. Limited activity due to decreased food consumption was associated with lower scores for Abandonment Coping (odds ratio [OR]: 0.4; P ​= ​0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2–0.9) and Re-Coping (OR: 0.3; P ​= ​0.003; 95% CI, 0.1–0.6). Higher levels of communicative health literacy were associated with higher Abandonment Coping scores (OR: 1.1; P ​= ​0.04; 95% CI, 1.0–1.3), and higher levels of critical health literacy were associated with higher Re-Coping scores (OR: 1.2; P ​= ​0.03; 95% CI, 1.0–1.3).

Conclusions

Limited activity due to decreased food consumption and limited coping flexibility were significantly associated. Health literacy had an important role in facilitating coping flexibility. Nursing support may be crucial in evaluating coping strategies and developing alternatives based on new information.
胃癌患者胃切除术后应对灵活性及相关因素:一项横断面多部位研究。
目的:了解胃癌切除术后患者应对灵活性的现状及相关因素。方法:对142例胃癌患者进行了横断面多中心研究,这些患者完成了应对灵活性、胃切除术后功能障碍、健康素养和感知社会支持的问卷调查。应对灵活性采用《应对灵活性量表修订版》进行测量,该量表包括三个子量表:放弃应对(即放弃无效的应对策略)、重新应对(即评估制定和实施替代性应对策略的过程)和元应对(即监测应对灵活性过程)。得分越高表明应对能力越强。采用描述性统计、单变量和多变量逻辑分析来检验与应对灵活性相关的因素。结果:参与者平均年龄为72.6(±10.5)岁。食物消耗减少导致的活动受限与“放弃应对”得分较低相关(优势比[OR]: 0.4;p = 0.03;95%可信区间[CI], 0.2-0.9)和Re-Coping (OR: 0.3;p = 0.003;95% ci, 0.1-0.6)。较高的交际健康素养水平与较高的遗弃应对得分相关(OR: 1.1;p = 0.04;95% CI, 1.0-1.3),较高水平的关键健康素养与较高的Re-Coping得分相关(OR: 1.2;p = 0.03;95% ci, 1.0-1.3)。结论:食物消耗减少导致的活动受限与应对灵活性受限显著相关。卫生知识普及在促进应对灵活性方面具有重要作用。护理支持在评估应对策略和根据新信息制定替代方案方面可能至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信