Using ecological momentary assessment to quantify Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol use across different forms of cannabis: Feasibility in a sample of Canadian young adults reporting frequent cannabis use.

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Addiction Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1111/add.16768
Sophie G Coelho, Sergio Rueda, Jeffrey D Wardell
{"title":"Using ecological momentary assessment to quantify Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol use across different forms of cannabis: Feasibility in a sample of Canadian young adults reporting frequent cannabis use.","authors":"Sophie G Coelho, Sergio Rueda, Jeffrey D Wardell","doi":"10.1111/add.16768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To establish the feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to estimate total quantities of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) used across different forms of cannabis, and to assess the predictive validity of THC estimates for predicting acute cannabis-related consequences.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>14-day EMA using a smartphone application to assess cannabis use in real time.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Targeted sample of n = 42 young adults (59.52% women, mean age 25 years) reporting frequent cannabis use.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Surveys completed immediately prior to cannabis use assessed the quantities, THC content and CBD content of various forms of cannabis to be used in the current session; participants also uploaded photos of the cannabis product labels when available. Surveys administered at fixed times throughout the day (84.81% completion rate) assessed acute cannabis-related consequences.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Participants completed a total of 786 pre-cannabis surveys, of which 79.39% and 77.35% contained sufficient information to calculate total THC and CBD (in milligrams), respectively. High agreement was observed between participant-entered THC and CBD contents and those shown in corresponding photos of cannabis product labels. Aggregating across all products used, participants reported using an average of 141.41 [standard deviation (SD) = 224.62, range = 0.00-2000.00] milligrams of THC (i.e. 28.28 standard five-milligram units) and 7.53 (SD = 34.87, range = 0.00-484.22) milligrams of CBD per day. Multilevel models revealed that participants were more likely to report acute negative consequences following sessions when their estimated THC use was higher than their typical THC use. At the between-person level, participants reporting more THC use on average across sessions were less likely to report negative consequences overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using ecological momentary assessment to estimate total quantities of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol used across different forms of cannabis appears to be feasible, with preliminary predictive validity for acute negative cannabis-related consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16768","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To establish the feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to estimate total quantities of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) used across different forms of cannabis, and to assess the predictive validity of THC estimates for predicting acute cannabis-related consequences.

Design: 14-day EMA using a smartphone application to assess cannabis use in real time.

Setting: Canada.

Participants: Targeted sample of n = 42 young adults (59.52% women, mean age 25 years) reporting frequent cannabis use.

Measurements: Surveys completed immediately prior to cannabis use assessed the quantities, THC content and CBD content of various forms of cannabis to be used in the current session; participants also uploaded photos of the cannabis product labels when available. Surveys administered at fixed times throughout the day (84.81% completion rate) assessed acute cannabis-related consequences.

Findings: Participants completed a total of 786 pre-cannabis surveys, of which 79.39% and 77.35% contained sufficient information to calculate total THC and CBD (in milligrams), respectively. High agreement was observed between participant-entered THC and CBD contents and those shown in corresponding photos of cannabis product labels. Aggregating across all products used, participants reported using an average of 141.41 [standard deviation (SD) = 224.62, range = 0.00-2000.00] milligrams of THC (i.e. 28.28 standard five-milligram units) and 7.53 (SD = 34.87, range = 0.00-484.22) milligrams of CBD per day. Multilevel models revealed that participants were more likely to report acute negative consequences following sessions when their estimated THC use was higher than their typical THC use. At the between-person level, participants reporting more THC use on average across sessions were less likely to report negative consequences overall.

Conclusions: Using ecological momentary assessment to estimate total quantities of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol used across different forms of cannabis appears to be feasible, with preliminary predictive validity for acute negative cannabis-related consequences.

利用生态瞬间评估量化不同形式大麻中Δ-9-四氢大麻酚和大麻二酚的使用情况:在报告经常使用大麻的加拿大年轻人样本中的可行性。
目的:建立使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)来估计不同形式大麻中Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)和大麻二酚(CBD)总量的可行性,并评估THC估计对预测急性大麻相关后果的预测有效性。设计:使用智能手机应用程序实时评估大麻使用情况的14天EMA。设置:加拿大。参与者:目标样本为n = 42名经常使用大麻的年轻人(59.52%为女性,平均年龄25岁)。测量:在使用大麻之前立即完成的调查评估了本届会议将使用的各种形式大麻的数量、四氢大麻酚含量和CBD含量;参与者还上传了大麻产品标签的照片。在一天中固定时间进行的调查(84.81%完成率)评估了急性大麻相关后果。研究结果:参与者共完成了786份大麻前调查,其中79.39%和77.35%分别包含足够的信息来计算总THC和CBD(以毫克计)。参与者输入的THC和CBD含量与大麻产品标签相应照片中显示的含量高度一致。在所有使用的产品中,参与者报告平均每天使用141.41[标准差(SD) = 224.62,范围= 0.00-2000.00]毫克四氢大麻酚(即28.28个标准5毫克单位)和7.53 (SD = 34.87,范围= 0.00-484.22)毫克CBD。多层模型显示,当参与者的估计四氢大麻酚使用量高于他们的典型四氢大麻酚使用量时,他们更有可能在会议后报告急性负面后果。在人与人之间的水平上,报告在会议期间平均使用更多THC的参与者总体上不太可能报告负面后果。结论:使用生态瞬时评估来估计Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol和大麻二酚在不同形式大麻中的使用总量似乎是可行的,对急性大麻相关的负面后果具有初步的预测有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信