A Streamlined High-Throughput LC–MS Assay for Quantifying Peptide Degradation in Cell Culture

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Samuel J. Rozans, Yingjie Wu, Abolfazl S. Moghaddam, E. Thomas Pashuck
{"title":"A Streamlined High-Throughput LC–MS Assay for Quantifying Peptide Degradation in Cell Culture","authors":"Samuel J. Rozans,&nbsp;Yingjie Wu,&nbsp;Abolfazl S. Moghaddam,&nbsp;E. Thomas Pashuck","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.37864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peptides are widely used in biomaterials due to their ease of synthesis, ability to signal cells, and modify the properties of biomaterials. A key benefit of using peptides is that they are natural substrates for cell-secreted enzymes, which creates the possibility of utilizing cell-secreted enzymes for tuning cell–material interactions. However, these enzymes can also induce unwanted degradation of bioactive peptides in biomaterials, or in peptide therapies. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) is a widely used, powerful methodology that can separate complex mixtures of molecules and quantify numerous analytes within a single run. There are several challenges in using LC–MS for the multiplexed quantification of cell-induced peptide degradation, including the need for nondegradable internal standards and the identification of optimal sample storage conditions. Another problem is that cell culture media and biological samples typically contain both proteins and lipids that can accumulate on chromatography columns and degrade their performance. Removing these constituents can be expensive, time-consuming, and increases sample variability. However, loading unpurified samples onto the column without removing lipids and proteins will foul the column. Here, we show that directly injecting complex, unpurified samples onto the LC–MS without any purification enables rapid and accurate quantification of peptide concentration and that hundreds of LC–MS runs can be done on a single column without significantly diminishing the ability to quantify the degradation of peptide libraries. To understand how repeated injections degrade column performance, a model library was injected into the LC–MS hundreds of times. It was then determined that column failure is evident when hydrophilic peptides are no longer retained on the column and that failure can be easily identified by using standard peptide mixtures for column benchmarking. In total, this work introduces a simple and effective method for simultaneously quantifying the degradation of dozens of peptides in cell culture. By providing a streamlined and cost-effective method for the direct quantification of peptide degradation in complex biological samples, this work enables more efficient assessment of peptide stability and functionality, facilitating the development of advanced biomaterials and peptide-based therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.a.37864","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.37864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peptides are widely used in biomaterials due to their ease of synthesis, ability to signal cells, and modify the properties of biomaterials. A key benefit of using peptides is that they are natural substrates for cell-secreted enzymes, which creates the possibility of utilizing cell-secreted enzymes for tuning cell–material interactions. However, these enzymes can also induce unwanted degradation of bioactive peptides in biomaterials, or in peptide therapies. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) is a widely used, powerful methodology that can separate complex mixtures of molecules and quantify numerous analytes within a single run. There are several challenges in using LC–MS for the multiplexed quantification of cell-induced peptide degradation, including the need for nondegradable internal standards and the identification of optimal sample storage conditions. Another problem is that cell culture media and biological samples typically contain both proteins and lipids that can accumulate on chromatography columns and degrade their performance. Removing these constituents can be expensive, time-consuming, and increases sample variability. However, loading unpurified samples onto the column without removing lipids and proteins will foul the column. Here, we show that directly injecting complex, unpurified samples onto the LC–MS without any purification enables rapid and accurate quantification of peptide concentration and that hundreds of LC–MS runs can be done on a single column without significantly diminishing the ability to quantify the degradation of peptide libraries. To understand how repeated injections degrade column performance, a model library was injected into the LC–MS hundreds of times. It was then determined that column failure is evident when hydrophilic peptides are no longer retained on the column and that failure can be easily identified by using standard peptide mixtures for column benchmarking. In total, this work introduces a simple and effective method for simultaneously quantifying the degradation of dozens of peptides in cell culture. By providing a streamlined and cost-effective method for the direct quantification of peptide degradation in complex biological samples, this work enables more efficient assessment of peptide stability and functionality, facilitating the development of advanced biomaterials and peptide-based therapies.

Abstract Image

用于量化细胞培养中多肽降解的简化高通量 LC-MS 分析法
多肽因其易于合成、能够向细胞发送信号和改变生物材料的性质而被广泛应用于生物材料中。使用多肽的一个关键好处是它们是细胞分泌酶的天然底物,这就创造了利用细胞分泌酶来调节细胞-物质相互作用的可能性。然而,这些酶也可以诱导生物材料或肽治疗中生物活性肽的不必要降解。液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS)是一种广泛使用的强大方法,可以分离复杂的分子混合物,并在一次运行中定量大量分析物。使用LC-MS对细胞诱导的肽降解进行多重定量分析存在一些挑战,包括需要不可降解的内标和确定最佳样品储存条件。另一个问题是,细胞培养基和生物样品通常含有蛋白质和脂质,它们会积聚在色谱柱上,降低色谱柱的性能。去除这些成分既昂贵又费时,还会增加样品的可变性。然而,在不去除脂质和蛋白质的情况下,将未纯化的样品装入色谱柱会污染色谱柱。在这里,我们展示了直接将复杂的,未纯化的样品注射到LC-MS上而不进行任何纯化,可以快速准确地定量肽浓度,并且可以在单柱上进行数百次LC-MS运行,而不会显著降低定量肽库降解的能力。为了了解重复进样对色谱柱性能的影响,我们将模型库进样数百次。然后确定,当亲水肽不再保留在柱上时,柱失效是明显的,并且可以通过使用标准肽混合物进行柱基准测试来轻松识别故障。总之,这项工作介绍了一种简单有效的方法,可以同时定量细胞培养中几十种肽的降解。通过为复杂生物样品中肽降解的直接定量提供一种简化且经济有效的方法,这项工作能够更有效地评估肽的稳定性和功能,促进先进生物材料和基于肽的疗法的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A is an international, interdisciplinary, English-language publication of original contributions concerning studies of the preparation, performance, and evaluation of biomaterials; the chemical, physical, toxicological, and mechanical behavior of materials in physiological environments; and the response of blood and tissues to biomaterials. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on all relevant biomaterial topics including the science and technology of alloys,polymers, ceramics, and reprocessed animal and human tissues in surgery,dentistry, artificial organs, and other medical devices. The Journal also publishes articles in interdisciplinary areas such as tissue engineering and controlled release technology where biomaterials play a significant role in the performance of the medical device. The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research is the official journal of the Society for Biomaterials (USA), the Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Articles are welcomed from all scientists. Membership in the Society for Biomaterials is not a prerequisite for submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信