Samuel J. Rozans, Yingjie Wu, Abolfazl S. Moghaddam, E. Thomas Pashuck
{"title":"A Streamlined High-Throughput LC–MS Assay for Quantifying Peptide Degradation in Cell Culture","authors":"Samuel J. Rozans, Yingjie Wu, Abolfazl S. Moghaddam, E. Thomas Pashuck","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.37864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peptides are widely used in biomaterials due to their ease of synthesis, ability to signal cells, and modify the properties of biomaterials. A key benefit of using peptides is that they are natural substrates for cell-secreted enzymes, which creates the possibility of utilizing cell-secreted enzymes for tuning cell–material interactions. However, these enzymes can also induce unwanted degradation of bioactive peptides in biomaterials, or in peptide therapies. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) is a widely used, powerful methodology that can separate complex mixtures of molecules and quantify numerous analytes within a single run. There are several challenges in using LC–MS for the multiplexed quantification of cell-induced peptide degradation, including the need for nondegradable internal standards and the identification of optimal sample storage conditions. Another problem is that cell culture media and biological samples typically contain both proteins and lipids that can accumulate on chromatography columns and degrade their performance. Removing these constituents can be expensive, time-consuming, and increases sample variability. However, loading unpurified samples onto the column without removing lipids and proteins will foul the column. Here, we show that directly injecting complex, unpurified samples onto the LC–MS without any purification enables rapid and accurate quantification of peptide concentration and that hundreds of LC–MS runs can be done on a single column without significantly diminishing the ability to quantify the degradation of peptide libraries. To understand how repeated injections degrade column performance, a model library was injected into the LC–MS hundreds of times. It was then determined that column failure is evident when hydrophilic peptides are no longer retained on the column and that failure can be easily identified by using standard peptide mixtures for column benchmarking. In total, this work introduces a simple and effective method for simultaneously quantifying the degradation of dozens of peptides in cell culture. By providing a streamlined and cost-effective method for the direct quantification of peptide degradation in complex biological samples, this work enables more efficient assessment of peptide stability and functionality, facilitating the development of advanced biomaterials and peptide-based therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.a.37864","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.37864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Peptides are widely used in biomaterials due to their ease of synthesis, ability to signal cells, and modify the properties of biomaterials. A key benefit of using peptides is that they are natural substrates for cell-secreted enzymes, which creates the possibility of utilizing cell-secreted enzymes for tuning cell–material interactions. However, these enzymes can also induce unwanted degradation of bioactive peptides in biomaterials, or in peptide therapies. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) is a widely used, powerful methodology that can separate complex mixtures of molecules and quantify numerous analytes within a single run. There are several challenges in using LC–MS for the multiplexed quantification of cell-induced peptide degradation, including the need for nondegradable internal standards and the identification of optimal sample storage conditions. Another problem is that cell culture media and biological samples typically contain both proteins and lipids that can accumulate on chromatography columns and degrade their performance. Removing these constituents can be expensive, time-consuming, and increases sample variability. However, loading unpurified samples onto the column without removing lipids and proteins will foul the column. Here, we show that directly injecting complex, unpurified samples onto the LC–MS without any purification enables rapid and accurate quantification of peptide concentration and that hundreds of LC–MS runs can be done on a single column without significantly diminishing the ability to quantify the degradation of peptide libraries. To understand how repeated injections degrade column performance, a model library was injected into the LC–MS hundreds of times. It was then determined that column failure is evident when hydrophilic peptides are no longer retained on the column and that failure can be easily identified by using standard peptide mixtures for column benchmarking. In total, this work introduces a simple and effective method for simultaneously quantifying the degradation of dozens of peptides in cell culture. By providing a streamlined and cost-effective method for the direct quantification of peptide degradation in complex biological samples, this work enables more efficient assessment of peptide stability and functionality, facilitating the development of advanced biomaterials and peptide-based therapies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A is an international, interdisciplinary, English-language publication of original contributions concerning studies of the preparation, performance, and evaluation of biomaterials; the chemical, physical, toxicological, and mechanical behavior of materials in physiological environments; and the response of blood and tissues to biomaterials. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on all relevant biomaterial topics including the science and technology of alloys,polymers, ceramics, and reprocessed animal and human tissues in surgery,dentistry, artificial organs, and other medical devices. The Journal also publishes articles in interdisciplinary areas such as tissue engineering and controlled release technology where biomaterials play a significant role in the performance of the medical device.
The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research is the official journal of the Society for Biomaterials (USA), the Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials.
Articles are welcomed from all scientists. Membership in the Society for Biomaterials is not a prerequisite for submission.