Teaching high quality paediatric basic life support to laypeople: The development and evaluation of a virtual simulation game.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-12-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100824
Samantha Boggs, James Dayre McNally, Katie O'Hearn, Michael Del Bel, Jennifer Armstrong, Dennis Newhook, Anna-Theresa Lobos
{"title":"Teaching high quality paediatric basic life support to laypeople: The development and evaluation of a virtual simulation game.","authors":"Samantha Boggs, James Dayre McNally, Katie O'Hearn, Michael Del Bel, Jennifer Armstrong, Dennis Newhook, Anna-Theresa Lobos","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-directed training has been recognized as a reasonable alternative to traditional instructor-led formats to teach laypeople Basic Life Support (BLS). Virtual tools can facilitate high-quality self-directed resuscitation education; however, their role in teaching paediatric BLS remains unclear due to limited empiric evaluation and suboptimal design of existing tools.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We describe the development and evaluation of a virtual simulation game (VSG) designed to teach high-quality paediatric BLS using a self-directed, online format with integrated deliberate practice and feedback.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot prospective single-arm cohort study examining the VSG's impact on laypeople's paediatric BLS self-efficacy, attitudes, and knowledge as well as learner reactions. Data was collected using online surveys immediately after VSG completion and was analysed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five participants (median age 32 years, 76% female, 11% active certification in paediatric BLS) evaluated the VSG. Participants reported high self-efficacy, willingness to perform paediatric BLS, and high perceived knowledge after VSG completion. Fifty (91%) achieved a passing score (≥13/15) on the paediatric BLS knowledge assessment. Learner reactions were favourable with 98% of participants agreeing that VSG educational content was clear and helpful. Mean System Usability Scale score was 81.1 (standard deviation 12.6) with a Net Promoter Score of 32 indicating high levels of usability and likelihood to recommend to others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The VSG was well-received by laypeople with positive effects observed on paediatric BLS self-efficacy, attitudes, and knowledge. Future studies should examine the impact of VSGs on skill performance through standalone or blended learning approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"21 ","pages":"100824"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-directed training has been recognized as a reasonable alternative to traditional instructor-led formats to teach laypeople Basic Life Support (BLS). Virtual tools can facilitate high-quality self-directed resuscitation education; however, their role in teaching paediatric BLS remains unclear due to limited empiric evaluation and suboptimal design of existing tools.

Aim: We describe the development and evaluation of a virtual simulation game (VSG) designed to teach high-quality paediatric BLS using a self-directed, online format with integrated deliberate practice and feedback.

Methods: We conducted a pilot prospective single-arm cohort study examining the VSG's impact on laypeople's paediatric BLS self-efficacy, attitudes, and knowledge as well as learner reactions. Data was collected using online surveys immediately after VSG completion and was analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Fifty-five participants (median age 32 years, 76% female, 11% active certification in paediatric BLS) evaluated the VSG. Participants reported high self-efficacy, willingness to perform paediatric BLS, and high perceived knowledge after VSG completion. Fifty (91%) achieved a passing score (≥13/15) on the paediatric BLS knowledge assessment. Learner reactions were favourable with 98% of participants agreeing that VSG educational content was clear and helpful. Mean System Usability Scale score was 81.1 (standard deviation 12.6) with a Net Promoter Score of 32 indicating high levels of usability and likelihood to recommend to others.

Conclusions: The VSG was well-received by laypeople with positive effects observed on paediatric BLS self-efficacy, attitudes, and knowledge. Future studies should examine the impact of VSGs on skill performance through standalone or blended learning approaches.

向外行人教授高质量儿科基础生命支持:虚拟模拟游戏的开发与评价。
背景:自我指导培训已被认为是传统的教师指导形式的合理替代,以教授外行人基本生命支持(BLS)。虚拟工具可以促进高质量的自主复苏教育;然而,由于有限的经验评估和现有工具的次优设计,它们在儿科BLS教学中的作用仍然不清楚。目的:我们描述了一个虚拟模拟游戏(VSG)的开发和评估,该游戏旨在使用自我指导的在线格式,结合故意练习和反馈来教授高质量的儿科BLS。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性单臂队列研究,研究了VSG对外行人的儿科BLS自我效能感、态度、知识以及学习者反应的影响。在VSG完成后立即使用在线调查收集数据,并使用描述性统计进行分析。结果:55名参与者(中位年龄32岁,76%为女性,11%为儿科BLS活跃认证)评估了VSG。参与者报告了高自我效能感、执行儿科BLS的意愿和VSG完成后的高感知知识。50例(91%)在儿童BLS知识评估中达到及格分数(≥13/15)。学习者的反应是有利的,98%的参与者同意VSG的教育内容清晰和有用。平均系统可用性量表得分为81.1(标准偏差为12.6),净推荐值为32,表明高水平的可用性和向他人推荐的可能性。结论:VSG在儿童BLS自我效能、态度和知识方面均有积极作用,受到外行人的欢迎。未来的研究应该通过独立或混合的学习方法来检验VSGs对技能表现的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信