Prehospital critical care beyond advanced life support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100803
Adam J Boulton, Rachel Edwards, Andrew Gadie, Daniel Clayton, Caroline Leech, Michael A Smyth, Terry Brown, Joyce Yeung
{"title":"Prehospital critical care beyond advanced life support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.","authors":"Adam J Boulton, Rachel Edwards, Andrew Gadie, Daniel Clayton, Caroline Leech, Michael A Smyth, Terry Brown, Joyce Yeung","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the clinical outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended by prehospital critical care teams compared to non-critical care teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO and the eligibility criteria followed a PICOST framework for ILCOR systematic reviews. Prehospital critical care was defined as any provider with enhanced clinical competencies beyond standard advanced life support algorithms and dedicated dispatch to critically ill patients. MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to 20 April 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and the certainty of evidence by the GRADE approach. Meta-analyses of pooled data from studies at moderate risk of bias were performed using a generic inverse-variance with random-effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search returned 6,444 results and 17 articles were included, reporting 1,192,158 patients. Three studies reported traumatic patients and one reported paediatric patients. All studies were non-randomised and 15 were at moderate risk of bias. Most studies included prehospital physicians (n = 16). For adult non-traumatic patients, the certainty of evidence was low and prehospital critical care was associated with improved survival to hospital admission (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.35-2.82), survival to hospital discharge (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10-1.63), survival at 30 days (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.38-1.75), and favourable neurological outcome at 30 days (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.19-1.84). Prehospital critical care was also associated with improved outcomes for traumatic and paediatric patients and the certainty of evidence was very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Attendance of prehospital critical care teams to patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"21 ","pages":"100803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess the clinical outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended by prehospital critical care teams compared to non-critical care teams.

Methods: This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO and the eligibility criteria followed a PICOST framework for ILCOR systematic reviews. Prehospital critical care was defined as any provider with enhanced clinical competencies beyond standard advanced life support algorithms and dedicated dispatch to critically ill patients. MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to 20 April 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and the certainty of evidence by the GRADE approach. Meta-analyses of pooled data from studies at moderate risk of bias were performed using a generic inverse-variance with random-effects.

Results: The search returned 6,444 results and 17 articles were included, reporting 1,192,158 patients. Three studies reported traumatic patients and one reported paediatric patients. All studies were non-randomised and 15 were at moderate risk of bias. Most studies included prehospital physicians (n = 16). For adult non-traumatic patients, the certainty of evidence was low and prehospital critical care was associated with improved survival to hospital admission (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.35-2.82), survival to hospital discharge (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10-1.63), survival at 30 days (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.38-1.75), and favourable neurological outcome at 30 days (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.19-1.84). Prehospital critical care was also associated with improved outcomes for traumatic and paediatric patients and the certainty of evidence was very low.

Conclusion: Attendance of prehospital critical care teams to patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with improved outcomes.

院外心脏骤停高级生命支持之外的院前重症监护:系统综述。
目的:评估院前重症监护小组与非重症监护小组对院外心脏骤停患者的临床结果。方法:本综述在PROSPERO前瞻性注册,入选标准遵循PICOST框架进行ILCOR系统评价。院前重症监护被定义为任何具有增强临床能力的提供者,超出标准的高级生命支持算法,并专门派遣重症患者。检索自成立至2024年4月20日的MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL数据库。偏倚风险采用ROBINS-I工具评估,证据确定性采用GRADE方法评估。对来自中等偏倚风险研究的汇总数据进行荟萃分析,采用随机效应的通用反方差法。结果:检索结果为6444条,包括17篇文章,报告1192158例患者。三项研究报告了创伤患者,一项研究报告了儿科患者。所有的研究都是非随机的,其中15项具有中等偏倚风险。大多数研究包括院前医生(n = 16)。对于成人非创伤性患者,证据的确定性较低,院前重症监护与入院前生存率(OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.35-2.82)、出院前生存率(OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10-1.63)、30天生存率(OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.38-1.75)和30天良好的神经预后(OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.19-1.84)相关。院前重症监护也与创伤和儿科患者预后的改善有关,证据的确定性非常低。结论:院前重症监护小组对院外心脏骤停患者的护理与改善预后相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信