Virucidal activity of olanexidine gluconate against SARS-CoV-2.

Access microbiology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1099/acmi.0.000812.v4
Rika Watanabe, Takuma Yoshida, Hidemasa Nakaminami
{"title":"Virucidal activity of olanexidine gluconate against SARS-CoV-2.","authors":"Rika Watanabe, Takuma Yoshida, Hidemasa Nakaminami","doi":"10.1099/acmi.0.000812.v4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antiseptics have been used for infection control against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Ethanol (EtOH) was found to be effective against SARS-CoV-2, while chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) was less effective. Therefore, virucidal activity may differ between different classes of antiseptic agents. In this study, the efficacy of antiseptics against SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated, and effective agents for infection control were identified. The following antiseptics were used in this study: 1.5% olanexidine gluconate (OLG); 80% EtOH; 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO); 0.2% benzalkonium chloride (BKC); 1% povidone-iodine (PVP-I); 0.5%, 1% and 1.5% CHG; and 0.5% alkyldiaminoethylglycine hydrochloride (AEG). The virucidal activity was evaluated at 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 min according to EN14476. After 0.5 min of exposure, 1.5% OLG, 80% EtOH, 1% NaClO, 0.2% BKC and 1% PVP-I inactivated SARS-CoV-2 below the detection limit. The virus survived in the presence of 0.5% CHG, 1% CHG or 0.5% AEG for 3 min. The virucidal activity of 1.5% CHG was insufficient after 0.5 min of exposure. The results showed that virucidal activity against SARS-CoV-2 differs depending on the class of antiseptic agents used under clean conditions. Despite belonging to the same class of biguanide antiseptics, OLG was more effective against SARS-CoV-2 than CHG.</p>","PeriodicalId":94366,"journal":{"name":"Access microbiology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000812.v4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antiseptics have been used for infection control against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Ethanol (EtOH) was found to be effective against SARS-CoV-2, while chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) was less effective. Therefore, virucidal activity may differ between different classes of antiseptic agents. In this study, the efficacy of antiseptics against SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated, and effective agents for infection control were identified. The following antiseptics were used in this study: 1.5% olanexidine gluconate (OLG); 80% EtOH; 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO); 0.2% benzalkonium chloride (BKC); 1% povidone-iodine (PVP-I); 0.5%, 1% and 1.5% CHG; and 0.5% alkyldiaminoethylglycine hydrochloride (AEG). The virucidal activity was evaluated at 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 min according to EN14476. After 0.5 min of exposure, 1.5% OLG, 80% EtOH, 1% NaClO, 0.2% BKC and 1% PVP-I inactivated SARS-CoV-2 below the detection limit. The virus survived in the presence of 0.5% CHG, 1% CHG or 0.5% AEG for 3 min. The virucidal activity of 1.5% CHG was insufficient after 0.5 min of exposure. The results showed that virucidal activity against SARS-CoV-2 differs depending on the class of antiseptic agents used under clean conditions. Despite belonging to the same class of biguanide antiseptics, OLG was more effective against SARS-CoV-2 than CHG.

葡萄糖酸奥兰内酯对SARS-CoV-2的抗病毒活性。
防腐剂已被用于控制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)的感染。发现乙醇(EtOH)对SARS-CoV-2有效,而葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)效果较差。因此,不同种类的杀菌剂的杀病毒活性可能不同。本研究评估了防腐剂对SARS-CoV-2的疗效,并确定了有效的感染控制药物。本研究使用的防腐剂为:1.5%葡萄糖酸酯(OLG);EtOH 80%;1%次氯酸钠(NaClO);0.2%苯扎氯铵(BKC);1%聚维酮碘(PVP-I);0.5%、1%和1.5% CHG;0.5%烷基二氨基乙基甘氨酸盐酸(AEG)。在0、0.5、1、2和3 min时,按照EN14476进行杀病毒活性评价。暴露0.5 min后,1.5%的OLG、80%的EtOH、1%的NaClO、0.2%的BKC和1%的PVP-I灭活了低于检测限的SARS-CoV-2。病毒在0.5% CHG、1% CHG或0.5% AEG中存活3分钟。暴露0.5 min后,1.5% CHG的毒力不足。结果表明,在清洁条件下,不同类型的防腐剂对SARS-CoV-2的杀病毒活性不同。尽管属于同一类双胍类防腐剂,但OLG对SARS-CoV-2的作用比CHG更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信