A discrete choice experiment on Chinese parents' preferences of vaccine schedules against six childhood infectious diseases.

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Vaccine: X Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100602
Aodi Huang, Lin Tang, Lifang Huang, Jun Li, Xue Zhang, Jiajie Liu, Yang Zhou, Bingling Zhang, Lei Wang, Qian Zhang, Xia Xu, Zemei Zhou, Yu Wang, Xiaoqi Wang, Qianqian Liu, Siyu Liu, Zundong Yin, Fuzhen Wang
{"title":"A discrete choice experiment on Chinese parents' preferences of vaccine schedules against six childhood infectious diseases.","authors":"Aodi Huang, Lin Tang, Lifang Huang, Jun Li, Xue Zhang, Jiajie Liu, Yang Zhou, Bingling Zhang, Lei Wang, Qian Zhang, Xia Xu, Zemei Zhou, Yu Wang, Xiaoqi Wang, Qianqian Liu, Siyu Liu, Zundong Yin, Fuzhen Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>China's Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) provides vaccinations against 12 vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs) at no cost to families. For some VPDs, parents may opt to substitute equivalent non-program vaccines, including combination vaccines, for EPI vaccines; substitute vaccines must be paid for by the family. Although parents have several choices for vaccinating their children, their preferences for vaccines and immunization schedules have not been systematically evaluated. We used a discrete choice experiment to evaluate four attributes of vaccines for routine immunization: number of injections, risk of mild side-effects, out-of-pocket cost, and location of manufacturer (domestic or imported).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a questionnaire-based survey conducted in vaccination clinics, guardians were asked to select their preferred vaccination schedule from five options in ten choice sets with the four attributes. We used a mixed logit model to determine parental preferences for vaccination schedules, relative importance of attributes, and predict the likelihood of successful vaccination under different scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 581 parents from seven provinces and cities in China participated in the survey, and 488 respondents had internally consistent responses and were included in the analysis. The number of injections in the schedule was the most important attribute for predicting uptake, followed by risk of mild side-effects. Preferences varied by region and parental role. Predicted uptake in the preferred vaccination scenario relative to base-case schedule uptake was a 99.55 % increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Number of injections and risk of mild side-effects were the two most important attributes of the routine immunization schedule. Results from this study can help optimize the immunization schedule in China to improve coverage of childhood vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"22 ","pages":"100602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: China's Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) provides vaccinations against 12 vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs) at no cost to families. For some VPDs, parents may opt to substitute equivalent non-program vaccines, including combination vaccines, for EPI vaccines; substitute vaccines must be paid for by the family. Although parents have several choices for vaccinating their children, their preferences for vaccines and immunization schedules have not been systematically evaluated. We used a discrete choice experiment to evaluate four attributes of vaccines for routine immunization: number of injections, risk of mild side-effects, out-of-pocket cost, and location of manufacturer (domestic or imported).

Methods: In a questionnaire-based survey conducted in vaccination clinics, guardians were asked to select their preferred vaccination schedule from five options in ten choice sets with the four attributes. We used a mixed logit model to determine parental preferences for vaccination schedules, relative importance of attributes, and predict the likelihood of successful vaccination under different scenarios.

Results: A total of 581 parents from seven provinces and cities in China participated in the survey, and 488 respondents had internally consistent responses and were included in the analysis. The number of injections in the schedule was the most important attribute for predicting uptake, followed by risk of mild side-effects. Preferences varied by region and parental role. Predicted uptake in the preferred vaccination scenario relative to base-case schedule uptake was a 99.55 % increase.

Conclusions: Number of injections and risk of mild side-effects were the two most important attributes of the routine immunization schedule. Results from this study can help optimize the immunization schedule in China to improve coverage of childhood vaccines.

中国父母对六种儿童传染病疫苗接种方案偏好的离散选择实验
背景:中国扩大免疫规划(EPI)为家庭免费提供12种疫苗可预防疾病(vpd)疫苗接种。对于一些vpd,家长可以选择替代等效的非规划疫苗,包括联合疫苗,以替代扩大免疫计划疫苗;替代疫苗必须由家庭支付。尽管父母在给孩子接种疫苗方面有几种选择,但他们对疫苗和免疫计划的偏好尚未得到系统评估。我们使用离散选择实验来评估常规免疫疫苗的四个属性:注射次数、轻微副作用的风险、自付费用和制造商的位置(国内或进口)。方法:在疫苗接种诊所进行问卷调查,要求监护人在10个选项集中从5个选项中选择自己喜欢的疫苗接种计划。我们使用混合logit模型来确定父母对疫苗接种计划的偏好,属性的相对重要性,并预测在不同情况下成功接种疫苗的可能性。结果:共有来自全国7个省市的581名家长参与了本次调查,其中488名受访者的回答内部一致,并被纳入分析。计划中的注射次数是预测摄取的最重要属性,其次是轻度副作用的风险。偏好因地区和父母角色而异。首选疫苗方案的预测接种率相对于基本病例计划接种率增加了99.55%。结论:注射次数和轻度副作用风险是常规免疫计划的两个最重要的属性。本研究结果有助于优化中国的免疫接种计划,提高儿童疫苗的覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信