Improving Cognitive Empathy Through Traumatic Brain Injury Experiential Learning: A Novel Mixed Methods Approach for Speech-Language Pathology Graduate Education.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Kathryn Hardin, Jessica Rossi-Katz, Scott Busch
{"title":"Improving Cognitive Empathy Through Traumatic Brain Injury Experiential Learning: A Novel Mixed Methods Approach for Speech-Language Pathology Graduate Education.","authors":"Kathryn Hardin, Jessica Rossi-Katz, Scott Busch","doi":"10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to gauge the impacts of cognitive empathy training experiential learning on traumatic brain injury (TBI) knowledge, awareness, confidence, and empathy in a pilot study of speech-language pathology graduate students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A descriptive quasi-experimental convergent parallel mixed methods design intervention pilot study (QUAL + QUANT) was conducted with a diverse convenience sample of 19 first- and second-year speech-language pathology graduate students who engaged in a half-day TBI point-of-view simulation. The simulation was co-constructed through a participatory design with those living with TBI based on Kolb's experiential learning model and followed the recommendations for point-of-view simulation ethics. After setting goals, participants engaged in four station activities completing cognitive communication activities of daily living, while experiencing manipulations to their sensory systems. Activities included reading while wearing goggles with blurred or double vision, listening with tinnitus and auditory processing disorder, and taking notes during a manipulated college lecture. Participants also interacted with an individual living with TBI and responded to targeted prompts throughout the day. Quantitative outcomes were measured using published TBI knowledge and empathy scales and analyzed with descriptive, parametric and nonparametric statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Data were then triangulated through mixed methods. Mixed methods design quality was ensured by following the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (Hong et al., 2018).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After experiential learning, significant increases in speech-language pathologist (SLP) TBI knowledge, empathy, and awareness of TBI symptom and symptom impacts were found. Many, but not all, participants also reported changes in clinical confidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive empathy training using experiential learning appears to be a viable method to increase SLP knowledge, empathy, and symptom awareness for TBI clinical care. Future research should replicate the study with different types and locations of speech-language pathology graduate programs to consider TBI empathy training as a standard training method to improve both individual and provider outcomes.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Individuals and families living with traumatic brain injury (TBI) say their providers lack necessary knowledge; do not seem to understand what living with TBI is like; and can be dismissive, uncaring, and lacking empathy. Health care providers do not automatically imagine the world from the patient's perspectives, to \"walk in another's shoes\"; it takes intentional effort and training. This project attempted to train those specific empathy skills for speech-language pathology graduate students through experiential learning. Experiential learning is a process where people engage in meaningful activities and spend lots of time reflecting on their experiences. Working with people living with TBI, we built a half-day workshop where 19 graduate students completed normal daily activities (such as texting, reading) through different stations that provided insights into what it may be like to have a TBI, such as wearing goggles to induce blurred or double vision, having ringing in their ears (tinnitus), and watching an overwhelming manipulated college video lecture. Afterward, participants listened to a person living with TBI and asked questions. This was important because engaging in activities without interacting with someone living with TBI misses a key idea about listening to and learning from individuals and families. We measured TBI knowledge, empathy, and confidence by looking at surveys pre- and posttraining and reading students' written reflections. Participants reported significant changes in how they think about brain injury and how they will provide clinical care for people living with TBI in the future.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28098254.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to gauge the impacts of cognitive empathy training experiential learning on traumatic brain injury (TBI) knowledge, awareness, confidence, and empathy in a pilot study of speech-language pathology graduate students.

Method: A descriptive quasi-experimental convergent parallel mixed methods design intervention pilot study (QUAL + QUANT) was conducted with a diverse convenience sample of 19 first- and second-year speech-language pathology graduate students who engaged in a half-day TBI point-of-view simulation. The simulation was co-constructed through a participatory design with those living with TBI based on Kolb's experiential learning model and followed the recommendations for point-of-view simulation ethics. After setting goals, participants engaged in four station activities completing cognitive communication activities of daily living, while experiencing manipulations to their sensory systems. Activities included reading while wearing goggles with blurred or double vision, listening with tinnitus and auditory processing disorder, and taking notes during a manipulated college lecture. Participants also interacted with an individual living with TBI and responded to targeted prompts throughout the day. Quantitative outcomes were measured using published TBI knowledge and empathy scales and analyzed with descriptive, parametric and nonparametric statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Data were then triangulated through mixed methods. Mixed methods design quality was ensured by following the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (Hong et al., 2018).

Results: After experiential learning, significant increases in speech-language pathologist (SLP) TBI knowledge, empathy, and awareness of TBI symptom and symptom impacts were found. Many, but not all, participants also reported changes in clinical confidence.

Conclusions: Cognitive empathy training using experiential learning appears to be a viable method to increase SLP knowledge, empathy, and symptom awareness for TBI clinical care. Future research should replicate the study with different types and locations of speech-language pathology graduate programs to consider TBI empathy training as a standard training method to improve both individual and provider outcomes.

Plain language summary: Individuals and families living with traumatic brain injury (TBI) say their providers lack necessary knowledge; do not seem to understand what living with TBI is like; and can be dismissive, uncaring, and lacking empathy. Health care providers do not automatically imagine the world from the patient's perspectives, to "walk in another's shoes"; it takes intentional effort and training. This project attempted to train those specific empathy skills for speech-language pathology graduate students through experiential learning. Experiential learning is a process where people engage in meaningful activities and spend lots of time reflecting on their experiences. Working with people living with TBI, we built a half-day workshop where 19 graduate students completed normal daily activities (such as texting, reading) through different stations that provided insights into what it may be like to have a TBI, such as wearing goggles to induce blurred or double vision, having ringing in their ears (tinnitus), and watching an overwhelming manipulated college video lecture. Afterward, participants listened to a person living with TBI and asked questions. This was important because engaging in activities without interacting with someone living with TBI misses a key idea about listening to and learning from individuals and families. We measured TBI knowledge, empathy, and confidence by looking at surveys pre- and posttraining and reading students' written reflections. Participants reported significant changes in how they think about brain injury and how they will provide clinical care for people living with TBI in the future.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28098254.

通过创伤性脑损伤体验式学习提高认知共情:语言病理学研究生教育的一种新型混合方法。
目的:本研究旨在探讨认知共情训练体验式学习对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)知识、意识、信心和共情的影响。方法:采用描述性准实验融合并行混合方法设计干预先导研究(QUAL + QUANT),选取19名参与为期半天的脑损伤视角模拟的一、二年级语言病理学研究生作为研究对象。基于Kolb的体验式学习模型,通过参与式设计与TBI患者共同构建模拟,并遵循观点模拟伦理的建议。在设定目标后,参与者进行四站活动,完成日常生活的认知交流活动,同时体验对感官系统的操作。这些活动包括戴着眼镜阅读,视力模糊或重影,伴有耳鸣和听觉处理障碍,以及在被操纵的大学讲座中做笔记。参与者还与TBI患者进行了互动,并对全天的目标提示做出了回应。定量结果采用已公布的TBI知识和共情量表进行测量,并采用描述性、参数性和非参数性统计进行分析,而定性数据通过专题分析进行分析。然后通过混合方法对数据进行三角测量。通过遵循混合方法评估工具(Hong et al., 2018)来确保混合方法设计质量。结果:体验式学习后,言语语言病理学家(SLP) TBI知识、共情、TBI症状和症状影响意识显著提高。许多(但不是全部)参与者也报告了临床信心的变化。结论:在TBI临床护理中,使用体验式学习的认知共情训练似乎是增加SLP知识、共情和症状意识的可行方法。未来的研究应该在不同类型和地点的语言病理学研究生课程中重复这项研究,以考虑将TBI移情训练作为一种标准的训练方法,以改善个人和提供者的结果。简单的语言总结:患有创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的个人和家庭表示,他们的医护人员缺乏必要的知识;似乎不明白脑外伤患者的生活是怎样的;而且可能会不屑一顾、漠不关心、缺乏同理心。卫生保健提供者不会自动地从病人的角度想象世界,“站在别人的角度”;它需要有意识的努力和训练。本项目试图通过体验式学习的方式来培养语言病理学研究生的移情能力。体验式学习是一个人们参与有意义的活动并花大量时间反思他们的经历的过程。与脑外伤患者一起,我们建立了一个为期半天的研讨会,让19名研究生通过不同的工作站完成正常的日常活动(如发短信、阅读),这些工作站提供了对脑外伤患者可能是什么样子的见解,比如戴上护目镜导致视力模糊或重影,耳鸣,观看一段令人眼花缭乱的精心制作的大学视频讲座。之后,参与者听一个患有脑外伤的人说话,并提出问题。这一点很重要,因为在没有与脑外伤患者互动的情况下参与活动,错过了倾听和向个人和家庭学习的关键理念。我们通过观察训练前后的调查和阅读学生的书面反思来衡量TBI知识、同理心和信心。参与者报告了他们对脑损伤的看法以及他们将来如何为TBI患者提供临床护理的重大变化。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28098254。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信