Microbial Dynamics: Assessing Skincare Regimens' Impact on the Facial Skin Microbiome and Skin Health Parameters.

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Nicole Wagner, Valerie Diane Valeriano, Samuel Diou-Hirtz, Evelina Björninen, Ulf Åkerström, Lars Engstrand, Ina Schuppe-Koistinen, Johanna Maria Gillbro
{"title":"Microbial Dynamics: Assessing Skincare Regimens' Impact on the Facial Skin Microbiome and Skin Health Parameters.","authors":"Nicole Wagner, Valerie Diane Valeriano, Samuel Diou-Hirtz, Evelina Björninen, Ulf Åkerström, Lars Engstrand, Ina Schuppe-Koistinen, Johanna Maria Gillbro","doi":"10.3390/microorganisms12122655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The human skin microbiome, a complex ecosystem of microbes, plays a pivotal role in skin health. This study aimed to investigate the impact of two skincare regimens, with preservatives (CSPs) and preservative-free (PFPs), on the skin microbiome in correlation to skin quality. double-blind randomized cosmetic studywith a split-face design was conducted on 26 female participants. Microbial diversity and abundance were analyzed using 16S rRNA amplicon sequence data and skin quality utilizing the Antera 3D skin camera. We confirmed earlier studies on the identification of major skin microbial taxa at the genus level, including <i>Cutibacterium acnes</i>, <i>Corynebacterium</i>, and <i>Neisseriaceae</i> as a predominant part of the facial skin microbiome. Furthermore, microbiome profile-based subgrouping was employed, which revealed that the cluster, characterized by the Neisseriaceae family as its predominant organism, exhibited significant reduction in folds count, fine lines, and redness after application of PFP compared to CSP. A Spearman correlation analysis highlighted the correlation between changes in specific bacteria and skin quality parameters such as redness, pores, and texture in the context of comparing PFP and CSP. Overall, the PFP treatment demonstrated a greater number of significant correlations between bacterial changes and skin quality compared to the CSP treatment, suggesting a distinct impact of the preservative-free skincare regimen on the skin microbiome and skin quality. Our study provides insights into different microbiome-centered approaches to improve our understanding of the skin microbiome's interplay with skin quality but also highlights the need for larger, comprehensive research to further understand the microbiome's role in dermatology.</p>","PeriodicalId":18667,"journal":{"name":"Microorganisms","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microorganisms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The human skin microbiome, a complex ecosystem of microbes, plays a pivotal role in skin health. This study aimed to investigate the impact of two skincare regimens, with preservatives (CSPs) and preservative-free (PFPs), on the skin microbiome in correlation to skin quality. double-blind randomized cosmetic studywith a split-face design was conducted on 26 female participants. Microbial diversity and abundance were analyzed using 16S rRNA amplicon sequence data and skin quality utilizing the Antera 3D skin camera. We confirmed earlier studies on the identification of major skin microbial taxa at the genus level, including Cutibacterium acnes, Corynebacterium, and Neisseriaceae as a predominant part of the facial skin microbiome. Furthermore, microbiome profile-based subgrouping was employed, which revealed that the cluster, characterized by the Neisseriaceae family as its predominant organism, exhibited significant reduction in folds count, fine lines, and redness after application of PFP compared to CSP. A Spearman correlation analysis highlighted the correlation between changes in specific bacteria and skin quality parameters such as redness, pores, and texture in the context of comparing PFP and CSP. Overall, the PFP treatment demonstrated a greater number of significant correlations between bacterial changes and skin quality compared to the CSP treatment, suggesting a distinct impact of the preservative-free skincare regimen on the skin microbiome and skin quality. Our study provides insights into different microbiome-centered approaches to improve our understanding of the skin microbiome's interplay with skin quality but also highlights the need for larger, comprehensive research to further understand the microbiome's role in dermatology.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microorganisms
Microorganisms Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2168
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and prions. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信