[Comparing standard microbiological methods for identification of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA with the automated BD MAXTM StaphSR system].

Q3 Medicine
Kristýna Hricová, Vendula Pudová, Kristýna Fišerová, Miroslava Htoutou Sedláková, Milan Kolář
{"title":"[Comparing standard microbiological methods for identification of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA with the automated BD MAXTM StaphSR system].","authors":"Kristýna Hricová, Vendula Pudová, Kristýna Fišerová, Miroslava Htoutou Sedláková, Milan Kolář","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Staphylococcus aureus is part of the human microbiota, but at the same time, it is capable of causing a wide range of diseases. Due to the ever-increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents and the existence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains, there is a real possibility of carrying even this resistant bacterium, which can subsequently cause a severe infection. MRSA detection is part of microbiological examination procedures, and it is appropriate to use rapid methods for its identification, especially in high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Clinical samples from the respiratory tract of patients from the Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, and the Third Internal Medicine Department of the University Hospital Olomouc were included in this study. These were processed simultaneously using standard microbiological methods and the automated BD MAXTM system, designed for qualitative detection of bacteria directly from clinical samples using real-time PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Standard microbiological methods identified S. aureus in 7 % and MRSA in 1 % of respiratory samples tested. Using the automated BD MAXTM system with the StaphSR kit, S. aureus DNA was detected in 28 % of samples and MRSA DNA in 2 % of samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Direct testing of clinical samples using the BD MAXTM StaphSR system can aid in the prevention and control of infections caused by S. aureus and MRSA, especially in healthcare facilities. An important advantage of this system is that the result is available on the same day that the clinical material is delivered for microbiological testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":17909,"journal":{"name":"Klinicka mikrobiologie a infekcni lekarstvi","volume":"30 1","pages":"11-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinicka mikrobiologie a infekcni lekarstvi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Staphylococcus aureus is part of the human microbiota, but at the same time, it is capable of causing a wide range of diseases. Due to the ever-increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents and the existence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains, there is a real possibility of carrying even this resistant bacterium, which can subsequently cause a severe infection. MRSA detection is part of microbiological examination procedures, and it is appropriate to use rapid methods for its identification, especially in high-risk patients.

Material and methods: Clinical samples from the respiratory tract of patients from the Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, and the Third Internal Medicine Department of the University Hospital Olomouc were included in this study. These were processed simultaneously using standard microbiological methods and the automated BD MAXTM system, designed for qualitative detection of bacteria directly from clinical samples using real-time PCR.

Results: Standard microbiological methods identified S. aureus in 7 % and MRSA in 1 % of respiratory samples tested. Using the automated BD MAXTM system with the StaphSR kit, S. aureus DNA was detected in 28 % of samples and MRSA DNA in 2 % of samples.

Conclusion: Direct testing of clinical samples using the BD MAXTM StaphSR system can aid in the prevention and control of infections caused by S. aureus and MRSA, especially in healthcare facilities. An important advantage of this system is that the result is available on the same day that the clinical material is delivered for microbiological testing.

[与全自动BD MAXTM StaphSR系统比较鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌和MRSA的标准微生物学方法]。
目的:金黄色葡萄球菌是人类微生物群的一部分,但同时,它能够引起广泛的疾病。由于对抗菌剂的耐药性不断增加以及耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌株的存在,甚至有可能携带这种耐药细菌,从而导致严重感染。MRSA检测是微生物学检查程序的一部分,使用快速方法进行鉴定是适当的,特别是在高危患者中。材料与方法:选取奥洛穆茨大学附属医院麻醉、复苏与重症医学科及内科第三科患者呼吸道临床样本。采用标准微生物学方法和全自动BD MAXTM系统同时进行处理,该系统专为使用实时PCR直接从临床样品中定性检测细菌而设计。结果:标准微生物学方法检测出7%的呼吸道样本中有金黄色葡萄球菌,1%的呼吸道样本中有MRSA。使用带有StaphSR试剂盒的自动化BD MAXTM系统,在28%的样品中检测到金黄色葡萄球菌DNA,在2%的样品中检测到MRSA DNA。结论:采用BD MAXTM StaphSR系统对临床样品进行直接检测有助于预防和控制金黄色葡萄球菌和MRSA引起的感染,特别是在医疗机构。该系统的一个重要优点是,结果可以在临床材料交付进行微生物测试的同一天获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klinicka mikrobiologie a infekcni lekarstvi
Klinicka mikrobiologie a infekcni lekarstvi Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信