Using Transorbital Sonography for Assessing Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Periorbital Hematoma.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Yi-Ping Bao, Tian-Yu Shen, Zi-Wei Lou, Yang Zhou, Ling Zhang
{"title":"Using Transorbital Sonography for Assessing Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Periorbital Hematoma.","authors":"Yi-Ping Bao, Tian-Yu Shen, Zi-Wei Lou, Yang Zhou, Ling Zhang","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the comparative effectiveness of transorbital sonography (TOS) and the pupillary penlight visual assessment method in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and periorbital hematoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 140 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were selected from a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province between January 2022 and December 2023. Pupillary function in all patients was assessed using both TOS and the pupillary penlight visual assessment method on the first, third, and seventh day after admission. The stability and consistency of the measurement results were compared. Stability was determined using the coefficient of variation, whereas consistency was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The coefficients of variation for the pupillary transverse diameter values measured by TOS were 29.84% (left) and 29.55% (right) on day 1, 27.81% (left) and 26.88% (right) on day 3, and 26.80% (left) and 25.51% (right) on day 7. These values were consistently lower than those obtained through the pupillary penlight visual assessment method, indicating superior stability with the TOS measurement. In addition, the intraclass correlation coefficient analysis demonstrated consistency between the 2 methods, with values ranging from 0.562 to 0.809 (P<0.05), indicating good consistency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TOS represents an innovative tool for neurological assessment. It has been validated that the presence or absence of eyelid edema does not compromise the accuracy of ultrasound-based pupillary function measurements. The 2 methods of measurement exhibit good consistency, with the TOS method demonstrating superior stability in monitoring data. This approach provides a more accurate means of assessing pupillary function in patients with TBI who have periorbital hematoma or facial swelling, particularly when opening the eyelid is challenging, thereby addressing a significant clinical nursing challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the comparative effectiveness of transorbital sonography (TOS) and the pupillary penlight visual assessment method in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and periorbital hematoma.

Methods: A total of 140 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were selected from a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province between January 2022 and December 2023. Pupillary function in all patients was assessed using both TOS and the pupillary penlight visual assessment method on the first, third, and seventh day after admission. The stability and consistency of the measurement results were compared. Stability was determined using the coefficient of variation, whereas consistency was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results: The coefficients of variation for the pupillary transverse diameter values measured by TOS were 29.84% (left) and 29.55% (right) on day 1, 27.81% (left) and 26.88% (right) on day 3, and 26.80% (left) and 25.51% (right) on day 7. These values were consistently lower than those obtained through the pupillary penlight visual assessment method, indicating superior stability with the TOS measurement. In addition, the intraclass correlation coefficient analysis demonstrated consistency between the 2 methods, with values ranging from 0.562 to 0.809 (P<0.05), indicating good consistency.

Conclusion: TOS represents an innovative tool for neurological assessment. It has been validated that the presence or absence of eyelid edema does not compromise the accuracy of ultrasound-based pupillary function measurements. The 2 methods of measurement exhibit good consistency, with the TOS method demonstrating superior stability in monitoring data. This approach provides a more accurate means of assessing pupillary function in patients with TBI who have periorbital hematoma or facial swelling, particularly when opening the eyelid is challenging, thereby addressing a significant clinical nursing challenge.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信