Insulin and insulin-like growth factor and risk of postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a case-cohort analysis.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Frances Em Albers, Christopher Tv Swain, Makayla Wc Lou, S Ghazaleh Dashti, Sabina Rinaldi, Vivian Viallon, Amalia Karahalios, Kristy A Brown, Marc J Gunter, Roger L Milne, Dallas R English, Brigid M Lynch
{"title":"Insulin and insulin-like growth factor and risk of postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a case-cohort analysis.","authors":"Frances Em Albers, Christopher Tv Swain, Makayla Wc Lou, S Ghazaleh Dashti, Sabina Rinaldi, Vivian Viallon, Amalia Karahalios, Kristy A Brown, Marc J Gunter, Roger L Milne, Dallas R English, Brigid M Lynch","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Higher concentration of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) increases postmenopausal breast cancer risk, but evidence for insulin and c-peptide is limited. Further, not all studies have accounted for potential confounding by biomarkers from other biological pathways, and not all were restricted to estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a case-cohort study of 1,223 postmenopausal women (347 with ER-positive breast cancer) from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. We measured insulin, c-peptide, IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and biomarkers of inflammatory and sex-steroid hormone pathways. Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for ER-positive breast cancer per doubling plasma concentration and for quartiles, without and with adjustment for other, potentially confounding biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ER-positive breast cancer risk was not associated with doubling of insulin (RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.14) or c-peptide (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.26). Risk appeared to decrease with doubling IGF-1 (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.03) and IGFBP-3 (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.90). RRs were not meaningfully different when exposures were modelled as quartiles. RRs were less than unity but imprecise after adjustment for inflammatory and sex-steroid hormone biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Circulating insulin, c-peptide, and IGF-1 were not positively associated with risk of ER-positive breast cancer in this case-cohort analysis of postmenopausal women.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Associations between insulin and c-peptide and risk of ER-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women are likely to be weak.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Higher concentration of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) increases postmenopausal breast cancer risk, but evidence for insulin and c-peptide is limited. Further, not all studies have accounted for potential confounding by biomarkers from other biological pathways, and not all were restricted to estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer.

Methods: This was a case-cohort study of 1,223 postmenopausal women (347 with ER-positive breast cancer) from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. We measured insulin, c-peptide, IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and biomarkers of inflammatory and sex-steroid hormone pathways. Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for ER-positive breast cancer per doubling plasma concentration and for quartiles, without and with adjustment for other, potentially confounding biomarkers.

Results: ER-positive breast cancer risk was not associated with doubling of insulin (RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.14) or c-peptide (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.26). Risk appeared to decrease with doubling IGF-1 (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.03) and IGFBP-3 (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.90). RRs were not meaningfully different when exposures were modelled as quartiles. RRs were less than unity but imprecise after adjustment for inflammatory and sex-steroid hormone biomarkers.

Conclusions: Circulating insulin, c-peptide, and IGF-1 were not positively associated with risk of ER-positive breast cancer in this case-cohort analysis of postmenopausal women.

Impact: Associations between insulin and c-peptide and risk of ER-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women are likely to be weak.

胰岛素和胰岛素样生长因子与绝经后雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌的风险:一项病例队列分析
背景:较高浓度的胰岛素样生长因子-1 (IGF-1)增加绝经后乳腺癌的风险,但胰岛素和c肽相关的证据有限。此外,并不是所有的研究都考虑到了来自其他生物途径的生物标志物的潜在混淆,也不是所有的研究都局限于雌激素受体(ER)阳性乳腺癌。方法:这是一项来自墨尔本合作队列研究的1223名绝经后妇女(347名er阳性乳腺癌患者)的病例队列研究。我们测量了胰岛素、c肽、IGF-1、胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白-3 (IGFBP-3)以及炎症和性类固醇激素途径的生物标志物。使用泊松回归与稳健方差估计器来估计er阳性乳腺癌的风险比(rr)和95%置信区间(95% ci),每加倍血浆浓度和四分位数,没有或调整其他可能混淆的生物标志物。结果:er阳性乳腺癌风险与胰岛素加倍(RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.14)或c肽(RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.26)无关。IGF-1 (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.03)和IGFBP-3 (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.90)加倍后,风险降低。当暴露以四分位数建模时,rr没有显著差异。调整炎症和性类固醇激素生物标志物后,rr小于统一,但不精确。结论:在绝经后妇女的病例队列分析中,循环胰岛素、c肽和IGF-1与er阳性乳腺癌的风险无正相关。影响:在绝经后妇女中,胰岛素和c肽与er阳性乳腺癌风险之间的关联可能很弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信