Mapping the terrain of social media misinformation: A scientometric exploration of global research

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jian Wang , Yujia Zhai , Fakhar Shahzad
{"title":"Mapping the terrain of social media misinformation: A scientometric exploration of global research","authors":"Jian Wang ,&nbsp;Yujia Zhai ,&nbsp;Fakhar Shahzad","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rise of social media has enabled unrestricted information sharing, regardless of its accuracy. Unfortunately, this has also resulted in the widespread dissemination of misinformation. This study aims to provide a comprehensive scientometric analysis under the PRISMA paradigm to clarify the repetitive trajectory of misinformation on social media in the current digital age. In this study, 3724 publications on social media misinformation from the Web of Science between January 2010 and February 2024 were analyzed scientifically and metrically using CiteSpace software. The findings reveal a sharp increase in annual publication output starting from 2015. The United States of America and China have made more significant contributions in publication volume and global collaborations than other nations. The top five keywords with high frequency are social media, fake news, information, misinformation, and news. In contrast to a brief review of existing articles, this study provides an exhaustive review of annual scientific research output, journals, countries, institutions, contributors, highly cited papers, and keywords in social media misinformation research. The developmental stages of social media misinformation research are charted, current hot topics are discussed, and avenues for future research are suggested.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 104691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825000046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of social media has enabled unrestricted information sharing, regardless of its accuracy. Unfortunately, this has also resulted in the widespread dissemination of misinformation. This study aims to provide a comprehensive scientometric analysis under the PRISMA paradigm to clarify the repetitive trajectory of misinformation on social media in the current digital age. In this study, 3724 publications on social media misinformation from the Web of Science between January 2010 and February 2024 were analyzed scientifically and metrically using CiteSpace software. The findings reveal a sharp increase in annual publication output starting from 2015. The United States of America and China have made more significant contributions in publication volume and global collaborations than other nations. The top five keywords with high frequency are social media, fake news, information, misinformation, and news. In contrast to a brief review of existing articles, this study provides an exhaustive review of annual scientific research output, journals, countries, institutions, contributors, highly cited papers, and keywords in social media misinformation research. The developmental stages of social media misinformation research are charted, current hot topics are discussed, and avenues for future research are suggested.
绘制社交媒体错误信息的地形:全球研究的科学计量学探索。
社交媒体的兴起使得信息共享不受限制,而不考虑其准确性。不幸的是,这也导致了错误信息的广泛传播。本研究旨在提供PRISMA范式下的综合科学计量分析,以澄清当前数字时代社交媒体上错误信息的重复轨迹。本研究使用CiteSpace软件对2010年1月至2024年2月期间来自Web of Science的3724篇关于社交媒体错误信息的出版物进行了科学和计量分析。研究结果显示,从2015年开始,年度出版物产量急剧增加。美国和中国在出版物数量和全球合作方面比其他国家做出了更大的贡献。频率最高的前5个关键词分别是社交媒体、假新闻、信息、误传和新闻。与对现有文章的简要回顾不同,本研究对社交媒体错误信息研究中的年度科研产出、期刊、国家、机构、贡献者、高被引论文和关键词进行了详尽的回顾。本文绘制了社交媒体错误信息研究的发展阶段图,讨论了当前的热点问题,并对未来的研究方向提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信