What About Nights, Weekends, and Wait Times? Adding an On-Demand Facilitated Telemedicine Buprenorphine Component to a Community-Based Peer Support Outreach Program.

Rachel P Winograd, Katherine C Brown, Schyler T Newman, Devin E Banks, Ryan W Carpenter, Zach Budesa, Jennifer Lunceford, Saad T Siddiqui, Sarfaraz Jasdanwala, Bradley Wing, Wendy Orson
{"title":"What About Nights, Weekends, and Wait Times? Adding an On-Demand Facilitated Telemedicine Buprenorphine Component to a Community-Based Peer Support Outreach Program.","authors":"Rachel P Winograd, Katherine C Brown, Schyler T Newman, Devin E Banks, Ryan W Carpenter, Zach Budesa, Jennifer Lunceford, Saad T Siddiqui, Sarfaraz Jasdanwala, Bradley Wing, Wendy Orson","doi":"10.1177/29767342241311123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020, loosened federal regulations allowed for buprenorphine for opioid use disorder to be initiated via telemedicine. In response to these regulatory changes and growing racial inequities in overdose in St. Louis, MO, a local, peer-led outreach program incorporated a new rapid access (RA) to buprenorphine program. RA facilitated same-day buprenorphine access by conducting peer-facilitated telemedicine visits in community settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used logistic regression to compare 1- and 3-month treatment and buprenorphine retention between clients in the RA and Traditional (ie, linkage to brick-and-mortar prescribers within 1-3 days) programmatic arms of a peer-led outreach program between December 2020 and June 2022. Propensity score matching allowed participants across groups to be matched on key factors (eg, sex, race, homelessness). Racial differences in program receipt/enrollment were also assessed through Chi-squared tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total program participation (N = 4139) included 1% (n = 52) in the RA program. Those in RA were more likely to be in treatment at 1 and 3 months and more likely to be on buprenorphine at 3 months compared to those in the Traditional group. The RA program included more White and fewer Black clients than expected. Four of the 8 reasons for non-enrollment differed by race, with Black individuals more likely to already have treatment secured but also more likely to decline the program or be unable to be contacted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first to demonstrate sustained benefits in treatment and medication engagement following same-day access to buprenorphine via community-based, peer-facilitated telemedicine. Lower-than-expected enrollment of Black individuals indicates a need for more culturally responsive implementation strategies for peer- and telemedicine-facilitated programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342241311123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241311123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2020, loosened federal regulations allowed for buprenorphine for opioid use disorder to be initiated via telemedicine. In response to these regulatory changes and growing racial inequities in overdose in St. Louis, MO, a local, peer-led outreach program incorporated a new rapid access (RA) to buprenorphine program. RA facilitated same-day buprenorphine access by conducting peer-facilitated telemedicine visits in community settings.

Methods: This study used logistic regression to compare 1- and 3-month treatment and buprenorphine retention between clients in the RA and Traditional (ie, linkage to brick-and-mortar prescribers within 1-3 days) programmatic arms of a peer-led outreach program between December 2020 and June 2022. Propensity score matching allowed participants across groups to be matched on key factors (eg, sex, race, homelessness). Racial differences in program receipt/enrollment were also assessed through Chi-squared tests.

Results: Total program participation (N = 4139) included 1% (n = 52) in the RA program. Those in RA were more likely to be in treatment at 1 and 3 months and more likely to be on buprenorphine at 3 months compared to those in the Traditional group. The RA program included more White and fewer Black clients than expected. Four of the 8 reasons for non-enrollment differed by race, with Black individuals more likely to already have treatment secured but also more likely to decline the program or be unable to be contacted.

Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate sustained benefits in treatment and medication engagement following same-day access to buprenorphine via community-based, peer-facilitated telemedicine. Lower-than-expected enrollment of Black individuals indicates a need for more culturally responsive implementation strategies for peer- and telemedicine-facilitated programs.

夜间、周末和等待时间怎么办?在社区同伴支持外展计划中增加按需远程医疗丁丙诺啡内容。
背景:2020年,放宽的联邦法规允许通过远程医疗启动丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍。为了应对这些监管变化和密苏里州圣路易斯过量用药中日益增长的种族不平等,当地一个由同行领导的外展项目纳入了新的丁丙诺啡快速获取(RA)项目。RA通过在社区环境中进行同行促进的远程医疗访问,促进了当天获得丁丙诺啡。方法:本研究使用逻辑回归比较了2020年12月至2022年6月期间,RA和传统(即在1-3天内与实体处方者联系)同行主导的外展项目的客户之间1个月和3个月的治疗和丁丙诺啡保留率。倾向评分匹配允许不同群体的参与者在关键因素(如性别、种族、无家可归)上进行匹配。项目接收/入学的种族差异也通过卡方检验进行评估。结果:总方案参与(N = 4139),其中1% (N = 52)参与了RA方案。类风湿性关节炎患者更有可能在1个月和3个月时接受治疗,在3个月时更有可能服用丁丙诺啡与传统组相比。RA项目的白人客户比预期的多,黑人客户比预期的少。8个原因中有4个因种族而异,黑人更有可能已经获得治疗,但也更有可能拒绝该计划或无法联系。结论:这项研究首次证明了通过基于社区的同行促进的远程医疗当天获得丁丙诺啡后在治疗和药物参与方面的持续益处。低于预期的黑人入学人数表明,需要为同伴和远程医疗促进项目制定更具文化响应性的实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信