{"title":"Real-World Long-Term Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Elderly Patients.","authors":"Hikaru Hagiwara, Noritsugu Nagai, Kotomi Otsubo, Sou Sasaki, Hiroyuki Aoyagi, Yasuyuki Chiba, Hirokazu Komoriyama, Yoshiya Kato, Masayuki Takahashi, Yusuke Tokuda, Toshihiro Shimizu, Minoru Sato, Toshiyuki Nagai, Toshihisa Anzai","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because it is unclear whether implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are equally effective in patients of all ages, we investigated the association of age with long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent ICD implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A total of 416 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 years) from 4 tertiary hospitals who underwent ICD implantation or were upgraded from an existing permanent pacemaker between January 2011 and November 2022 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups based on age: <65 years (n=158), 65-74 years (n=138), and ≥75 years (n=120). We compared the incidence of all-cause death and adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiac death, appropriate ICD therapy, and heart failure hospitalization. During a median follow-up period of 3.2 years (interquartile range: 1.1-5.6 years), 120 patients died. Older patients had a higher cumulative incidence of all-cause death and composite adverse cardiovascular events. The cumulative incidence of cardiac death and appropriate ICD therapies did not differ significantly; however, the incidence of hospitalization for heart failure increased with age. In multivariate analysis, age was independently associated with all-cause death but not composite adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age had a significant effect on subsequent all-cause death, but not on adverse cardiovascular events in patients with ICDs, suggesting that age should not be the only indication considered for ICD implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"7 1","pages":"15-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Because it is unclear whether implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are equally effective in patients of all ages, we investigated the association of age with long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent ICD implantation.
Methods and results: A total of 416 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 years) from 4 tertiary hospitals who underwent ICD implantation or were upgraded from an existing permanent pacemaker between January 2011 and November 2022 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups based on age: <65 years (n=158), 65-74 years (n=138), and ≥75 years (n=120). We compared the incidence of all-cause death and adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiac death, appropriate ICD therapy, and heart failure hospitalization. During a median follow-up period of 3.2 years (interquartile range: 1.1-5.6 years), 120 patients died. Older patients had a higher cumulative incidence of all-cause death and composite adverse cardiovascular events. The cumulative incidence of cardiac death and appropriate ICD therapies did not differ significantly; however, the incidence of hospitalization for heart failure increased with age. In multivariate analysis, age was independently associated with all-cause death but not composite adverse outcomes.
Conclusions: Age had a significant effect on subsequent all-cause death, but not on adverse cardiovascular events in patients with ICDs, suggesting that age should not be the only indication considered for ICD implantation.