{"title":"Distance and Direction Matters: Risk Perception Among Residents Around a Dump Yard in Kerala, India.","authors":"Antony Paul Payyappilly, Priya Babu, Manju R Nair","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S491900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Waste mismanagement is a growing concern in developing countries where unsustainable practices such as open dumping and open burning are rampant. This study examined the risk perceptions of the residents living in proximity to the Brahmapuram dump yard, situated in Ernakulam district of Kerala State, India- A site marked by persistent local protests, public outrage, and legal disputes arising from issues related to waste mismanagement. The study focused on the geospatial and sociodemographic factors that might influence these perceptions.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 302 respondents living within 4 kilometers from the borders of the dump yard using a structured interview schedule. The responses of the participants were used to compute a risk perception score, which reflected participants' risk perception regarding the environment and their health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the participants in the study, those who lived within 2 kilometers (2.3 (95% CI 0.96, 3.7; p<0.001)), those who lived to the east (2.7 (95% CI 1.1, 4.2; p<0.001)) and those who reported perceiving strong malodor from the dump yard (2.0 (95% CI 0.54, 3.4; p=0.007)), had a higher risk perception in the multivariate linear regression model. Women had a lesser risk perception compared to men (-2.6 (95% CI -3.7, -1.4; p<0.001)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of geospatial characteristics (distance and direction), malodor and gender differences in shaping the risk perceptions among the proximate residents living around a waste dump yard. Consideration of geospatial and sociodemographic determinants in risk assessment and management could potentially reduce the perceived risks and public discontent around waste management facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"65-76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725276/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S491900","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Waste mismanagement is a growing concern in developing countries where unsustainable practices such as open dumping and open burning are rampant. This study examined the risk perceptions of the residents living in proximity to the Brahmapuram dump yard, situated in Ernakulam district of Kerala State, India- A site marked by persistent local protests, public outrage, and legal disputes arising from issues related to waste mismanagement. The study focused on the geospatial and sociodemographic factors that might influence these perceptions.
Patients and methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 302 respondents living within 4 kilometers from the borders of the dump yard using a structured interview schedule. The responses of the participants were used to compute a risk perception score, which reflected participants' risk perception regarding the environment and their health.
Results: Among the participants in the study, those who lived within 2 kilometers (2.3 (95% CI 0.96, 3.7; p<0.001)), those who lived to the east (2.7 (95% CI 1.1, 4.2; p<0.001)) and those who reported perceiving strong malodor from the dump yard (2.0 (95% CI 0.54, 3.4; p=0.007)), had a higher risk perception in the multivariate linear regression model. Women had a lesser risk perception compared to men (-2.6 (95% CI -3.7, -1.4; p<0.001)).
Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of geospatial characteristics (distance and direction), malodor and gender differences in shaping the risk perceptions among the proximate residents living around a waste dump yard. Consideration of geospatial and sociodemographic determinants in risk assessment and management could potentially reduce the perceived risks and public discontent around waste management facilities.
目的:废物管理不善是发展中国家日益关注的问题,在这些国家,诸如露天倾倒和露天焚烧等不可持续的做法十分猖獗。这项研究调查了居住在印度喀拉拉邦埃纳库拉姆地区布拉马普拉姆垃圾场附近的居民的风险认知。该垃圾场的特点是当地持续不断的抗议活动、公众的愤怒,以及与废物管理不善有关的法律纠纷。这项研究的重点是可能影响这些看法的地理空间和社会人口因素。患者和方法:采用结构化访谈时间表,对居住在距垃圾场边界4公里范围内的302名受访者进行了横断面调查。参与者的回答被用来计算风险感知得分,该得分反映了参与者对环境和健康的风险感知。结果:在研究的参与者中,居住在2公里范围内的人(2.3 (95% CI 0.96, 3.7;结论:研究结果强调了地理空间特征(距离和方向)、恶臭和性别差异对形成垃圾堆场附近居民风险认知的重要性。在风险评估和管理中考虑地理空间和社会人口决定因素可能会减少感知到的风险和公众对废物管理设施的不满。
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.