A Summary of the Best Evidence for Wet Pack Management.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S497773
Liangying Yi, Yanhua Chen, Ruixue Hu
{"title":"A Summary of the Best Evidence for Wet Pack Management.","authors":"Liangying Yi, Yanhua Chen, Ruixue Hu","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S497773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wet pack after steam sterilization of medical devices in healthcare facilities are unacceptable.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To retrieve, evaluate and integrate the best evidence related to wet pack management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the JBI, Up To Date, BMJ, National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Cochrane library, PubMed, Guideline International Network (GIN), AORN Journal, and other databases using the pyramid \"6S\" model for guidelines, expert consensus, systematic reviews, evidence summaries, decisions, recommended practices, and technical reports on wet pack management. The period of the literature search is from the establishment of the database to January 2024. Two researchers evaluated the literature quality independently, and evidence was extracted from the literature that met the quality standards. AGREE II assessment system, Cochrane bias risk assessment, and JBI Evidence-Based Health care center authenticity assessment were used as the literature evaluation criteria and the JBI 2014 edition evidence pre-grading system for intervention studies. For all types of research, the literature quality and evidence level was evaluated, extracted, and summarized according to the theme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the inclusion criteria, seven pieces of literature were selected, including three guidelines, three randomized controlled trials, and consensus from an expert. Twenty pieces of evidence were obtained from seven different aspects: device packaging stage, loading stage, sterilization stage, unloading and cooling stage, distribution stage, wet package evaluation and analysis, and personnel training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study summarizes the best evidence on wet pack management and can provide a reference for staff practices in disinfection supply centers to reduce the incidence of wet packs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"43-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S497773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Wet pack after steam sterilization of medical devices in healthcare facilities are unacceptable.

Purpose: To retrieve, evaluate and integrate the best evidence related to wet pack management.

Methods: We searched the JBI, Up To Date, BMJ, National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Cochrane library, PubMed, Guideline International Network (GIN), AORN Journal, and other databases using the pyramid "6S" model for guidelines, expert consensus, systematic reviews, evidence summaries, decisions, recommended practices, and technical reports on wet pack management. The period of the literature search is from the establishment of the database to January 2024. Two researchers evaluated the literature quality independently, and evidence was extracted from the literature that met the quality standards. AGREE II assessment system, Cochrane bias risk assessment, and JBI Evidence-Based Health care center authenticity assessment were used as the literature evaluation criteria and the JBI 2014 edition evidence pre-grading system for intervention studies. For all types of research, the literature quality and evidence level was evaluated, extracted, and summarized according to the theme.

Results: Based on the inclusion criteria, seven pieces of literature were selected, including three guidelines, three randomized controlled trials, and consensus from an expert. Twenty pieces of evidence were obtained from seven different aspects: device packaging stage, loading stage, sterilization stage, unloading and cooling stage, distribution stage, wet package evaluation and analysis, and personnel training.

Conclusion: This study summarizes the best evidence on wet pack management and can provide a reference for staff practices in disinfection supply centers to reduce the incidence of wet packs.

湿包管理最佳证据总结。
背景:医疗设施中医疗器械蒸汽灭菌后的湿包是不可接受的。目的:检索、评价和整合与湿包管理有关的最佳证据。方法:我们使用金字塔“6S”模型检索了JBI、Up To Date、BMJ、National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC)、National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)、Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)、Cochrane library、PubMed、Guidelines International Network (GIN)、AORN Journal等数据库,以获取湿包管理方面的指南、专家共识、系统评价、证据摘要、决策、推荐做法和技术报告。文献检索时间为数据库建立至2024年1月。两位研究者独立评估文献质量,并从符合质量标准的文献中提取证据。采用accord II评估系统、Cochrane偏倚风险评估和JBI循证医疗中心真实性评估作为文献评价标准,采用JBI 2014版证据预分级系统进行干预研究。对于所有类型的研究,根据主题对文献质量和证据水平进行评估、提取和总结。结果:根据纳入标准,选择了7篇文献,包括3篇指南、3篇随机对照试验和1位专家的共识。从器械包装阶段、装载阶段、灭菌阶段、卸载与冷却阶段、配送阶段、湿包装评价与分析、人员培训等7个不同方面获得证据20份。结论:总结了湿包管理的最佳证据,可为消毒供应中心工作人员减少湿包的发生提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信