Multicenter analysis of the incidence of in-stent stenosis following the deployment of flow-redirection endoluminal device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Avi A Gajjar, Georgios S Sioutas, Amanda Custozzo, Mohamed M Salem, Nicholas C Field, Oleg Shekhtman, Pierce Davis, Tarun Prabhala, Brian T Jankowitz, John C Dalfino, Alan S Boulos, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Alexandra R Paul, Visish M Srinivasan
{"title":"Multicenter analysis of the incidence of in-stent stenosis following the deployment of flow-redirection endoluminal device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.","authors":"Avi A Gajjar, Georgios S Sioutas, Amanda Custozzo, Mohamed M Salem, Nicholas C Field, Oleg Shekhtman, Pierce Davis, Tarun Prabhala, Brian T Jankowitz, John C Dalfino, Alan S Boulos, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Alexandra R Paul, Visish M Srinivasan","doi":"10.1177/15910199241304855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) is a novel flow diverter with a unique double stent design, with an inner stent composed of 48 nitinol wires, and an outer stent with 16 nitinol wires. It is designed for endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment, although, limited data exist regarding in-stent stenosis (ISS) rates associated with FRED devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A registry encompassing two North American comprehensive stroke centers was the base of this study. We longitudinally assessed patients implanted with FRED devices, emphasizing baseline demographics, aneurysmal characteristics, procedural data, aneurysmal occlusion, and the incidence of ISS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort of 87 patients receiving 88 FRED devices, ISS occurred in 10.4% (9) of cases. Mild ISS (<50%) was noted in 8.0% (7) of patients, moderate ISS (50-75%) in 1.1% (1), and severe ISS (>75%) in 1.1% (1). Analysis indicated ISS in 17.0% (8) of patients with the FRED device and 5.7% (2) with the FRED-X device; all ISS cases in the FRED-X group were mild. Differences in ISS rates between device types were not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.122). Delayed thrombotic events were documented in 6.9% (6) of patients. Aneurysm occlusion rates, measured via the Raymond-Roy Scale (RRS), showed adequate occlusion (RRS 1 or 2) in 68.8% at 3 months, 74.6% at 6 months, and 89.3% at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study elucidates the efficacy and safety profile of FRED devices, presenting favorable aneurysm occlusion rates and low retreatment needs while underscoring the manageability of ISS.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241304855"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241304855","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) is a novel flow diverter with a unique double stent design, with an inner stent composed of 48 nitinol wires, and an outer stent with 16 nitinol wires. It is designed for endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment, although, limited data exist regarding in-stent stenosis (ISS) rates associated with FRED devices.

Methods: A registry encompassing two North American comprehensive stroke centers was the base of this study. We longitudinally assessed patients implanted with FRED devices, emphasizing baseline demographics, aneurysmal characteristics, procedural data, aneurysmal occlusion, and the incidence of ISS.

Results: In our cohort of 87 patients receiving 88 FRED devices, ISS occurred in 10.4% (9) of cases. Mild ISS (<50%) was noted in 8.0% (7) of patients, moderate ISS (50-75%) in 1.1% (1), and severe ISS (>75%) in 1.1% (1). Analysis indicated ISS in 17.0% (8) of patients with the FRED device and 5.7% (2) with the FRED-X device; all ISS cases in the FRED-X group were mild. Differences in ISS rates between device types were not significant (p = 0.122). Delayed thrombotic events were documented in 6.9% (6) of patients. Aneurysm occlusion rates, measured via the Raymond-Roy Scale (RRS), showed adequate occlusion (RRS 1 or 2) in 68.8% at 3 months, 74.6% at 6 months, and 89.3% at 12 months.

Conclusions: The study elucidates the efficacy and safety profile of FRED devices, presenting favorable aneurysm occlusion rates and low retreatment needs while underscoring the manageability of ISS.

血流重定向腔内装置治疗颅内动脉瘤后支架内狭窄发生率的多中心分析
介绍:FRED是一种新型的分流器,采用独特的双支架设计,内支架由48根镍钛诺丝组成,外支架由16根镍钛诺丝组成。它是为血管内脑动脉瘤治疗而设计的,尽管关于FRED装置相关的支架内狭窄(ISS)发生率的数据有限。方法:包括两个北美综合卒中中心的注册表是本研究的基础。我们对植入FRED装置的患者进行了纵向评估,强调了基线人口统计学、动脉瘤特征、手术数据、动脉瘤闭塞和ISS发生率。结果:在接受88个FRED装置的87例患者队列中,10.4%(9)的病例发生ISS。1.1%(1)的患者出现轻度ISS(75%)。分析显示,使用FRED装置的患者出现ISS的比例为17.0%(8),使用FRED- x装置的患者出现ISS的比例为5.7% (2);FRED-X组ISS病例均为轻度。不同设备类型间ISS发生率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.122)。6.9%(6)的患者记录了迟发性血栓事件。通过Raymond-Roy量表(RRS)测量的动脉瘤闭塞率显示,3个月时68.8%,6个月时74.6%,12个月时89.3%的动脉瘤闭塞率为1或2。结论:该研究阐明了FRED装置的有效性和安全性,显示了良好的动脉瘤闭塞率和低再治疗需求,同时强调了ISS的可管理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信