Bringing biomechanics to ballet: a feasibility study using wearable technology during grand allegro.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Thomas Swords, Jodie McClelland, Kane Middleton, Bruna Tessarin, Shaun Bryce, Susan Mayes, Ebonie Rio
{"title":"Bringing biomechanics to ballet: a feasibility study using wearable technology during grand allegro.","authors":"Thomas Swords, Jodie McClelland, Kane Middleton, Bruna Tessarin, Shaun Bryce, Susan Mayes, Ebonie Rio","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2024.2446181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantifying impact accelerations during ballet class may assist load management. The largest impact accelerations occur during the sequence of large (single or double-leg) jumps (grand allegro) but are potentially the most challenging class component for utilising wearable technology, and feasibility is unknown. This pilot study utilised wearable technology during class to (1) explore feasibility and acceptability, (2) quantify impact accelerations during the entire sequence of jumps during grand allegro and (3) compare impact accelerations between limbs (preferred and non-preferred landing limb). Twelve pre-professional ballet dancers (18 ± 0.71 years old, eight females) wore inertial measurement units on each leg during class and reported acceptability. Total impact accelerations and percentage differences between limb loading during allegro were calculated. Most dancers (<i>n</i> = 11) reported wearable technology was feasible/acceptable during class. There were no significant differences between impact accelerations of preferred and non-preferred limb (<i>p</i> = 0.72) nor between limb comparison (<i>p</i> = 0.18). Most dancers were symmetrical (90% to 110%) in limb loading (<i>N</i> = 8). Wearable technology was considered acceptable during ballet class, opening future exploration of the whole class, different classes and rehearsals, as well as potential use for returning dancers back from injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":49482,"journal":{"name":"Sports Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2024.2446181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantifying impact accelerations during ballet class may assist load management. The largest impact accelerations occur during the sequence of large (single or double-leg) jumps (grand allegro) but are potentially the most challenging class component for utilising wearable technology, and feasibility is unknown. This pilot study utilised wearable technology during class to (1) explore feasibility and acceptability, (2) quantify impact accelerations during the entire sequence of jumps during grand allegro and (3) compare impact accelerations between limbs (preferred and non-preferred landing limb). Twelve pre-professional ballet dancers (18 ± 0.71 years old, eight females) wore inertial measurement units on each leg during class and reported acceptability. Total impact accelerations and percentage differences between limb loading during allegro were calculated. Most dancers (n = 11) reported wearable technology was feasible/acceptable during class. There were no significant differences between impact accelerations of preferred and non-preferred limb (p = 0.72) nor between limb comparison (p = 0.18). Most dancers were symmetrical (90% to 110%) in limb loading (N = 8). Wearable technology was considered acceptable during ballet class, opening future exploration of the whole class, different classes and rehearsals, as well as potential use for returning dancers back from injury.

将生物力学引入芭蕾:在大快板中使用可穿戴技术的可行性研究。
在芭蕾课上量化冲击加速度有助于负荷管理。最大的冲击加速度发生在大型(单腿或双腿)跳跃(大快板)的序列中,但这可能是利用可穿戴技术最具挑战性的课程组成部分,其可行性尚不清楚。这项试点研究在课堂上使用可穿戴技术来(1)探索可行性和可接受性,(2)量化大快板期间整个跳跃序列中的冲击加速度,(3)比较四肢之间的冲击加速度(首选和非首选着陆肢体)。12名专业前芭蕾舞者(18±0.71岁,8名女性)在上课时每条腿上都佩戴了惯性测量装置,并报告了可接受性。计算了总冲击加速度和四肢加载之间的百分比差异。大多数舞者(n = 11)报告可穿戴技术在课堂上是可行的/可接受的。优选肢体与非优选肢体的碰撞加速度无显著差异(p = 0.72),优选肢体与非优选肢体的碰撞加速度无显著差异(p = 0.18)。大多数舞者的肢体负荷是对称的(90% ~ 110%)(N = 8)。可穿戴技术在芭蕾课上被认为是可以接受的,这开启了未来对整个班级、不同班级和排练的探索,以及对伤愈归来的舞者的潜在应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Biomechanics
Sports Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Biomechanics is the Thomson Reuters listed scientific journal of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS). The journal sets out to generate knowledge to improve human performance and reduce the incidence of injury, and to communicate this knowledge to scientists, coaches, clinicians, teachers, and participants. The target performance realms include not only the conventional areas of sports and exercise, but also fundamental motor skills and other highly specialized human movements such as dance (both sport and artistic). Sports Biomechanics is unique in its emphasis on a broad biomechanical spectrum of human performance including, but not limited to, technique, skill acquisition, training, strength and conditioning, exercise, coaching, teaching, equipment, modeling and simulation, measurement, and injury prevention and rehabilitation. As well as maintaining scientific rigour, there is a strong editorial emphasis on ''reader friendliness''. By emphasising the practical implications and applications of research, the journal seeks to benefit practitioners directly. Sports Biomechanics publishes papers in four sections: Original Research, Reviews, Teaching, and Methods and Theoretical Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信