Effectiveness of Balanced Electrolyte Solution vs Normal Saline in the Resuscitation of Adult Patients with Diabetic Ketoacidosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Priyanka Gupta, Prashant Nasa, Shuib Mohammed Shahabdeen
{"title":"Effectiveness of Balanced Electrolyte Solution vs Normal Saline in the Resuscitation of Adult Patients with Diabetic Ketoacidosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Priyanka Gupta, Prashant Nasa, Shuib Mohammed Shahabdeen","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>Fluid resuscitation is the first-line treatment for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). However, the optimal choice of resuscitative fluid remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the impact of balanced electrolyte solution (BES) compared to 0.9% sodium chloride (NS) on various physiological and clinical outcomes in adult DKA patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An extensive search of electronic databases, including Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, was conducted to select studies that directly compared BES and NS in adult DKA patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis included nine studies, comprising both randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies. Combined estimates were expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcomes were time to resolution of DKA and length of hospital stay. The secondary outcomes were post-resuscitation chloride and bicarbonate levels and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed between BES and NS in the time to DKA resolution (MD: -1.63; 95% CI: -7.66-4.41; <i>p</i> = 0.60) or length of hospital stay (MD: -0.07; 95% CI: -0.44-0.31; <i>p</i> = 0.73). However, BES resulted in significantly higher post-resuscitation bicarbonate levels (MD: 1.63; 95% CI: 0.86-2.39; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower post-resuscitation chloride levels (MD: -2.37; 95% CI: -3.56 to -1.19; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of BES is associated with improved post-resuscitation electrolyte balance and preventing hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis in DKA patients. While BES may offer some biochemical advantages, both BES and NS are safe for treating DKA.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Gupta P, Nasa P, Shahabdeen SM. Effectiveness of Balanced Electrolyte Solution vs Normal Saline in the Resuscitation of Adult Patients with Diabetic Ketoacidosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(1):65-74.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11719558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim and background: Fluid resuscitation is the first-line treatment for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). However, the optimal choice of resuscitative fluid remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the impact of balanced electrolyte solution (BES) compared to 0.9% sodium chloride (NS) on various physiological and clinical outcomes in adult DKA patients.

Materials and methods: An extensive search of electronic databases, including Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, was conducted to select studies that directly compared BES and NS in adult DKA patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis included nine studies, comprising both randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies. Combined estimates were expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcomes were time to resolution of DKA and length of hospital stay. The secondary outcomes were post-resuscitation chloride and bicarbonate levels and adverse events.

Results: No significant difference was observed between BES and NS in the time to DKA resolution (MD: -1.63; 95% CI: -7.66-4.41; p = 0.60) or length of hospital stay (MD: -0.07; 95% CI: -0.44-0.31; p = 0.73). However, BES resulted in significantly higher post-resuscitation bicarbonate levels (MD: 1.63; 95% CI: 0.86-2.39; p < 0.001) and lower post-resuscitation chloride levels (MD: -2.37; 95% CI: -3.56 to -1.19; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The use of BES is associated with improved post-resuscitation electrolyte balance and preventing hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis in DKA patients. While BES may offer some biochemical advantages, both BES and NS are safe for treating DKA.

How to cite this article: Gupta P, Nasa P, Shahabdeen SM. Effectiveness of Balanced Electrolyte Solution vs Normal Saline in the Resuscitation of Adult Patients with Diabetic Ketoacidosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(1):65-74.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信