Association of Glycemic Variability with Outcomes in Non-diabetic Sepsis Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Prithiviraaj Prakash, Prayas Sethi, Naval Vikram, Maroof Khan, Yashdeep Gupta, Ranveer S Jadon, Arvind Kumar, Ved P Meena, Naveet Wig
{"title":"Association of Glycemic Variability with Outcomes in Non-diabetic Sepsis Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Prithiviraaj Prakash, Prayas Sethi, Naval Vikram, Maroof Khan, Yashdeep Gupta, Ranveer S Jadon, Arvind Kumar, Ved P Meena, Naveet Wig","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glycemic variability (GV) is the third domain of sepsis-induced dysglycemia, after hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, potentially leading to adverse outcomes. This study analyzed the association of GV with in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) in non-diabetic sepsis patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, non-diabetic sepsis patients were followed till day 14 of hospital stay, and blood glucose levels were assessed by finger-prick method (seven times per day) daily; clinico-laboratory and GV parameters [standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE)] were assessed on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 of admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirteen patients were screened and 80 (mean age 45.6 ± 15.37 years; 50% men) were included in the final analysis. Patients with in-hospital mortality had significantly higher GV when compared to patients without in-hospital mortality [SD: 37.57 vs 25.21, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.24, <i>p</i> = 0.013; CV: 24.91 vs 16.88, aOR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.38, <i>p</i> = 0.016; MAGE: 73.13 vs 48.03, aOR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11, <i>p</i> = 0.014], independent of illness severity (APACHE II), mean blood glucose and hypoglycemia on multivariate regression analysis. There was no significant correlation between GV and LOS. Multivariate analysis showed a significant independent association between CV and ventilator requirement (aOR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03-1.29, <i>p</i> = 0.017) and between SD and need for renal replacement therapy (aOR 1.04, 95% CI: 1-1.09, <i>p</i> = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that GV is independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality in non-diabetic sepsis patients. Further studies are required to investigate whether targeting lower GV in septic patients would translate to better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Glycemic variability in sepsis is controversial, with discordant results and a paucity of studies on the Indian population in the literature. Despite blood sugar monitoring being routinely done in sepsis patients, GV is rarely measured and the results of our study indicate that it may be worthwhile to estimate GV in sepsis. This may aid in identifying a subset of patients with increased mortality risk, who may benefit from intensive glucose monitoring and modification of insulin regimen.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Prakash P, Sethi P, Vikram N, Khan M, Gupta Y, Jadon RS, <i>et al.</i> Association of Glycemic Variability with Outcomes in Non-diabetic Sepsis Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(1):27-35.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":"27-35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11719557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glycemic variability (GV) is the third domain of sepsis-induced dysglycemia, after hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, potentially leading to adverse outcomes. This study analyzed the association of GV with in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) in non-diabetic sepsis patients.

Materials and methods: In this prospective observational study, non-diabetic sepsis patients were followed till day 14 of hospital stay, and blood glucose levels were assessed by finger-prick method (seven times per day) daily; clinico-laboratory and GV parameters [standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE)] were assessed on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 of admission.

Results: Two hundred thirteen patients were screened and 80 (mean age 45.6 ± 15.37 years; 50% men) were included in the final analysis. Patients with in-hospital mortality had significantly higher GV when compared to patients without in-hospital mortality [SD: 37.57 vs 25.21, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.24, p = 0.013; CV: 24.91 vs 16.88, aOR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.38, p = 0.016; MAGE: 73.13 vs 48.03, aOR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11, p = 0.014], independent of illness severity (APACHE II), mean blood glucose and hypoglycemia on multivariate regression analysis. There was no significant correlation between GV and LOS. Multivariate analysis showed a significant independent association between CV and ventilator requirement (aOR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03-1.29, p = 0.017) and between SD and need for renal replacement therapy (aOR 1.04, 95% CI: 1-1.09, p = 0.044).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that GV is independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality in non-diabetic sepsis patients. Further studies are required to investigate whether targeting lower GV in septic patients would translate to better outcomes.

Clinical significance: Glycemic variability in sepsis is controversial, with discordant results and a paucity of studies on the Indian population in the literature. Despite blood sugar monitoring being routinely done in sepsis patients, GV is rarely measured and the results of our study indicate that it may be worthwhile to estimate GV in sepsis. This may aid in identifying a subset of patients with increased mortality risk, who may benefit from intensive glucose monitoring and modification of insulin regimen.

How to cite this article: Prakash P, Sethi P, Vikram N, Khan M, Gupta Y, Jadon RS, et al. Association of Glycemic Variability with Outcomes in Non-diabetic Sepsis Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(1):27-35.

非糖尿病败血症患者血糖变化与预后的关系:前瞻性观察研究
背景:血糖变异性(GV)是脓毒症诱导的血糖异常的第三个领域,仅次于高血糖和低血糖,可能导致不良结局。本研究分析了非糖尿病脓毒症患者GV与住院死亡率和住院时间(LOS)的关系。材料与方法:本前瞻性观察研究对非糖尿病性脓毒症患者进行随访,随访至住院第14天,每日采用针刺法(7次/ d)检测血糖水平;于入院第1、3、5、7、10和14天评估临床-实验室和GV参数[标准差(SD)、变异系数(CV)、平均血糖偏移幅度(MAGE)]。结果:共筛选患者213例,其中80例(平均年龄45.6±15.37岁;50%男性)被纳入最终分析。住院死亡率患者的GV明显高于无住院死亡率患者[SD: 37.57 vs 25.21,调整优势比(aOR) 1.13, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.02-1.24, p = 0.013;CV: 24.91 vs 16.88, aOR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.38, p = 0.016;多因素回归分析显示,MAGE: 73.13 vs 48.03, aOR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11, p = 0.014],与疾病严重程度(APACHE II)、平均血糖和低血糖无关。GV与LOS之间无显著相关性。多因素分析显示CV与呼吸机需求(aOR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03-1.29, p = 0.017)以及SD与肾脏替代治疗需求(aOR 1.04, 95% CI: 1-1.09, p = 0.044)之间存在显著的独立关联。结论:本研究表明GV与非糖尿病脓毒症患者住院死亡率升高独立相关。需要进一步的研究来调查针对脓毒症患者的低GV是否会转化为更好的结果。临床意义:脓毒症的血糖变异性是有争议的,结果不一致,文献中对印度人群的研究不足。尽管在脓毒症患者中常规进行血糖监测,但很少测量GV,我们的研究结果表明,估计脓毒症患者的GV可能是值得的。这可能有助于确定死亡风险增加的患者亚群,这些患者可能受益于强化血糖监测和胰岛素治疗方案的修改。如何引用本文:Prakash P, Sethi P, Vikram N, Khan M, Gupta Y, Jadon RS等。非糖尿病性脓毒症患者血糖变异性与预后的关系:一项前瞻性观察研究。中华检验医学杂志,2015;29(1):27-35。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信