Real-time ultrasound for umbilical venous catheter insertion in neonates- a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine
Rajendra Prasad Anne, Emine A Rahiman, Abhishek Somashekara Aradhya
{"title":"Real-time ultrasound for umbilical venous catheter insertion in neonates- a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Rajendra Prasad Anne, Emine A Rahiman, Abhishek Somashekara Aradhya","doi":"10.1186/s13089-025-00406-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There has been an increase in real-time ultrasonography use in central venous catheterisation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the role of real-time ultrasound use in umbilical venous catheterisation in neonates.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched on July 11, 2024. We followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (for study conduct), GRADE methodology (for certainty of evidence), and PRISMA guidelines (for reporting).</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>All randomised controlled trials/RCTs and non-randomised studies of interventions/NRSIs comparing real-time ultrasound with the conventional technique of umbilical venous catheterisation were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>The outcomes of interest were malposition rates, procedure duration, mortality, sepsis, and cost. Data extraction and quality assessment were done in duplicate.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Six studies (three RCTs and three NRSI), including 863 participants, were included. Data were analysed separately for RCTs and NRSIs. The RCTs were at low risk of bias, but NRSIs were at moderate to serious risk. The pooled estimates from RCTs showed a decrease in malposition rates (2 studies, 165 participants, risk ratio/RR 0.45, 95% confidence interval/CI 0.23, 0.90) and procedure duration (3 studies, 196 participants, mean difference -6.1 min, 95% CI -8.4, -3.8 min) with real-time ultrasound use. There was no reduction in sepsis. Mortality was not reported. The certainty of evidence was low for malposition rates and procedure duration. The data from NRSIs showed a reduction in malposition rates (3 studies, 667 participants, risk ratio/RR 0.10, 95% confidence interval/CI 0.07, 0.14) without an impact on procedure duration and sepsis. However, these findings did not improve the evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low certainty evidence suggests that using real-time ultrasound for umbilical venous catheterisation reduces malposition rates. There is a clinically insignificant reduction in procedure duration. There is no sufficient data to come to a conclusion on the critical outcomes of sepsis and mortality. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024567895.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00406-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There has been an increase in real-time ultrasonography use in central venous catheterisation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the role of real-time ultrasound use in umbilical venous catheterisation in neonates.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched on July 11, 2024. We followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (for study conduct), GRADE methodology (for certainty of evidence), and PRISMA guidelines (for reporting).

Study selection: All randomised controlled trials/RCTs and non-randomised studies of interventions/NRSIs comparing real-time ultrasound with the conventional technique of umbilical venous catheterisation were included.

Data extraction: The outcomes of interest were malposition rates, procedure duration, mortality, sepsis, and cost. Data extraction and quality assessment were done in duplicate.

Data synthesis: Six studies (three RCTs and three NRSI), including 863 participants, were included. Data were analysed separately for RCTs and NRSIs. The RCTs were at low risk of bias, but NRSIs were at moderate to serious risk. The pooled estimates from RCTs showed a decrease in malposition rates (2 studies, 165 participants, risk ratio/RR 0.45, 95% confidence interval/CI 0.23, 0.90) and procedure duration (3 studies, 196 participants, mean difference -6.1 min, 95% CI -8.4, -3.8 min) with real-time ultrasound use. There was no reduction in sepsis. Mortality was not reported. The certainty of evidence was low for malposition rates and procedure duration. The data from NRSIs showed a reduction in malposition rates (3 studies, 667 participants, risk ratio/RR 0.10, 95% confidence interval/CI 0.07, 0.14) without an impact on procedure duration and sepsis. However, these findings did not improve the evidence.

Conclusions: Low certainty evidence suggests that using real-time ultrasound for umbilical venous catheterisation reduces malposition rates. There is a clinically insignificant reduction in procedure duration. There is no sufficient data to come to a conclusion on the critical outcomes of sepsis and mortality. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024567895.

新生儿脐静脉置管实时超声的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:实时超声在中心静脉置管中的应用越来越多。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估实时超声在新生儿脐静脉置管中的作用。数据来源:PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library检索时间为2024年7月11日。我们遵循Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册(研究行为)、GRADE方法(证据的确定性)和PRISMA指南(报告)。研究选择:纳入所有比较实时超声与传统脐静脉置管技术的干预/NRSIs的随机对照试验/ rct和非随机研究。数据提取:关注的结果是位错率、手术时间、死亡率、败血症和费用。数据提取和质量评价一式两份。数据综合:纳入6项研究(3项rct和3项NRSI),共863名受试者。分别对rct和nrsi的数据进行分析。rct的偏倚风险较低,但nri的偏倚风险为中度至重度。随机对照试验的汇总估计显示,使用实时超声后,体位错误率(2项研究,165名受试者,风险比/RR 0.45, 95%可信区间/CI 0.23, 0.90)和手术持续时间(3项研究,196名受试者,平均差值-6.1分钟,95% CI -8.4, -3.8分钟)降低。败血症没有减少。死亡率没有报告。证据的确定性在错位率和手术时间方面较低。来自nrsi的数据显示,位错率降低(3项研究,667名参与者,风险比/RR 0.10, 95%可信区间/CI 0.07, 0.14),但对手术持续时间和败血症没有影响。然而,这些发现并没有改善证据。结论:低确定性的证据表明,使用实时超声进行脐静脉置管可降低位错率。手术时间的减少在临床上并不显著。没有足够的数据来得出脓毒症和死亡率的关键结果的结论。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024567895。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信