Evaluation of the Application of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations on the Classification of Patients With Neck Pain.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Michelle M Ramirez, Marissa Carvalho, Katie Pruka, Derek Clewley, Charlotte Selters, Alexandra Lonner, Hayley Phillips, Gerard P Brennan, Steven Z George, Maggie E Horn
{"title":"Evaluation of the Application of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations on the Classification of Patients With Neck Pain.","authors":"Michelle M Ramirez, Marissa Carvalho, Katie Pruka, Derek Clewley, Charlotte Selters, Alexandra Lonner, Hayley Phillips, Gerard P Brennan, Steven Z George, Maggie E Horn","doi":"10.1177/15563316241309351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are developed to synthesize evidence into recommendations for clinical practice. Minimal evidence exists on the evaluation practice of physical therapists in the treatment of patients with neck pain. <i>Purpose</i>: We sought to describe (1) the extent to which clinicians perform the Neck Pain CPG-recommended examination measures and (2) the percentage of patients properly classified. <i>Methods</i>: We retrospectively analyzed the electronic health records of 397 patients with neck pain at an ambulatory care setting in an academic medical center. The frequency of physical therapists' evaluation measures, subjective findings, positive examination results, and the percentage of patients properly classified into impairment-based categories (IBCs) were recorded. Descriptive statistics and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were used to assess patient demographics and compare classification accuracy across IBCs. <i>Results</i>: Of the 397 patients, 56% were classified into an IBC. The most common IBC was neck pain with mobility deficits (24%), followed by neck pain with radiating pain (17%), neck pain with movement coordination impairments (NPMCIs) (8%), and neck pain with headache (6%). Neck pain with movement coordination impairment had the lowest percentage of proper classifications. Classification accuracy was highest when subjective and objective findings were combined and varied between IBCs. <i>Conclusion</i>: Our findings suggest that physical therapists evaluating patients with neck pain may have increased classification accuracy when subjective and objective findings are considered. Decreased classification accuracy was demonstrated in the NPMCI category, highlighting opportunities for further education and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":35357,"journal":{"name":"Hss Journal","volume":" ","pages":"15563316241309351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11713943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hss Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241309351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are developed to synthesize evidence into recommendations for clinical practice. Minimal evidence exists on the evaluation practice of physical therapists in the treatment of patients with neck pain. Purpose: We sought to describe (1) the extent to which clinicians perform the Neck Pain CPG-recommended examination measures and (2) the percentage of patients properly classified. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the electronic health records of 397 patients with neck pain at an ambulatory care setting in an academic medical center. The frequency of physical therapists' evaluation measures, subjective findings, positive examination results, and the percentage of patients properly classified into impairment-based categories (IBCs) were recorded. Descriptive statistics and χ2 tests were used to assess patient demographics and compare classification accuracy across IBCs. Results: Of the 397 patients, 56% were classified into an IBC. The most common IBC was neck pain with mobility deficits (24%), followed by neck pain with radiating pain (17%), neck pain with movement coordination impairments (NPMCIs) (8%), and neck pain with headache (6%). Neck pain with movement coordination impairment had the lowest percentage of proper classifications. Classification accuracy was highest when subjective and objective findings were combined and varied between IBCs. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that physical therapists evaluating patients with neck pain may have increased classification accuracy when subjective and objective findings are considered. Decreased classification accuracy was demonstrated in the NPMCI category, highlighting opportunities for further education and research.

颈痛患者分类临床实践指南建议的应用评价。
背景:临床实践指南(CPGs)的制定是为了将证据综合为临床实践的建议。很少有证据表明物理治疗师在治疗颈部疼痛患者时的评估实践。目的:我们试图描述(1)临床医生执行cpg推荐的颈部疼痛检查措施的程度和(2)正确分类的患者百分比。方法:回顾性分析某学术医疗中心门诊397例颈部疼痛患者的电子病历。记录物理治疗师评估措施的频率、主观发现、阳性检查结果以及适当归类为损伤分类(IBCs)的患者百分比。采用描述性统计和χ2检验评估患者人口统计学特征,比较IBCs的分类准确性。结果:397例患者中,56%归为IBC。最常见的IBC是颈部疼痛伴活动能力不足(24%),其次是颈部疼痛伴放射性疼痛(17%),颈部疼痛伴运动协调障碍(NPMCIs)(8%)和颈部疼痛伴头痛(6%)。颈部疼痛伴运动协调障碍的适当分类比例最低。当主观和客观结果相结合并在IBCs之间变化时,分类准确性最高。结论:我们的研究结果表明,当考虑到主观和客观的发现时,物理治疗师评估颈部疼痛患者的分类准确性可能会提高。在NPMCI类别中,分类准确性下降,突出了进一步教育和研究的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hss Journal
Hss Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The HSS Journal is the Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery. The aim of the HSS Journal is to promote cutting edge research, clinical pathways, and state-of-the-art techniques that inform and facilitate the continuing education of the orthopaedic and musculoskeletal communities. HSS Journal publishes articles that offer contributions to the advancement of the knowledge of musculoskeletal diseases and encourages submission of manuscripts from all musculoskeletal disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信