Exploring the gaps: A scoping review of burn injury research in skin of colour.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Antoinette Nguyen, Emily Duckworth, Anmar Abu-Romman, Bradley Melnick, Brigid Coles, Robert D Galiano
{"title":"Exploring the gaps: A scoping review of burn injury research in skin of colour.","authors":"Antoinette Nguyen, Emily Duckworth, Anmar Abu-Romman, Bradley Melnick, Brigid Coles, Robert D Galiano","doi":"10.1111/wrr.13252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn injury management and outcomes reveal observed disparities in individuals with darker skin tones, likely influenced by limited representation in medical literature and clinical research. These gaps may contribute to variations in care quality and outcomes for these populations. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases, initially yielding 74 articles. Due to limited relevant studies directly addressing the research question, the approach shifted from a systematic review to a scoping review to allow for a broader exploration of potential disparities in burn injury outcomes. Following these criteria, 31 relevant articles were identified and analysed. The analysis suggests an underrepresentation of diverse skin tones in medical textbooks and clinical research, limitations in current burn assessment tools for darker skin, and a lack of tailored treatment protocols. Studies indicate that patients with darker skin tones may face higher risks of complications and varied outcomes, potentially influenced by systemic healthcare challenges and limited guidelines addressing diverse skin types. This scoping review highlights the importance of more inclusive research and clinical practices that consider the specific needs of individuals with darker skin tones. Addressing these observed gaps can support improvements in burn injury management, ultimately contributing to more equitable healthcare for all skin types.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":"33 1","pages":"e13252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burn injury management and outcomes reveal observed disparities in individuals with darker skin tones, likely influenced by limited representation in medical literature and clinical research. These gaps may contribute to variations in care quality and outcomes for these populations. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases, initially yielding 74 articles. Due to limited relevant studies directly addressing the research question, the approach shifted from a systematic review to a scoping review to allow for a broader exploration of potential disparities in burn injury outcomes. Following these criteria, 31 relevant articles were identified and analysed. The analysis suggests an underrepresentation of diverse skin tones in medical textbooks and clinical research, limitations in current burn assessment tools for darker skin, and a lack of tailored treatment protocols. Studies indicate that patients with darker skin tones may face higher risks of complications and varied outcomes, potentially influenced by systemic healthcare challenges and limited guidelines addressing diverse skin types. This scoping review highlights the importance of more inclusive research and clinical practices that consider the specific needs of individuals with darker skin tones. Addressing these observed gaps can support improvements in burn injury management, ultimately contributing to more equitable healthcare for all skin types.

探索空白:有色皮肤烧伤研究的范围综述。
烧伤处理和结果显示,在肤色较深的个体中观察到差异,可能受到医学文献和临床研究中代表性有限的影响。这些差距可能导致这些人群的护理质量和结果的差异。在PubMed、Scopus和Embase数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,最初产生了74篇文章。由于直接解决研究问题的相关研究有限,该方法从系统评价转向范围评价,以允许更广泛地探索烧伤结果的潜在差异。根据这些标准,确定和分析了31项相关条款。分析表明,在医学教科书和临床研究中,不同肤色的代表性不足,目前对深色皮肤的烧伤评估工具存在局限性,以及缺乏量身定制的治疗方案。研究表明,肤色较深的患者可能面临更高的并发症风险和不同的结果,这可能受到系统性医疗挑战和针对不同皮肤类型的有限指南的影响。这一范围审查强调了考虑深肤色个体的特殊需求的更具包容性的研究和临床实践的重要性。解决这些观察到的差距可以支持改善烧伤管理,最终有助于为所有皮肤类型提供更公平的医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Wound Repair and Regeneration 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others. Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信