Rajveer Sagoo BS , Navraj S. Sagoo MD , Ali S. Haider BS , Mohanakrishnan Sathyamoorthy MD
{"title":"Impact of body mass index on in-hospital outcomes in patients receiving leadless pacemakers: A five-category analysis","authors":"Rajveer Sagoo BS , Navraj S. Sagoo MD , Ali S. Haider BS , Mohanakrishnan Sathyamoorthy MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The adoption of leadless pacemakers (LPMs) is increasing, yet the impact of body mass index (BMI) on procedural outcomes remains underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of BMI on in-hospital outcomes for patients receiving LPM implantation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2018–2021 were analyzed for patients older than 18 years who underwent LPM implantation, with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria applied. Patients were identified using <em>International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision</em> codes and categorized into BMI groups: underweight, normal, overweight, obese, and morbidly obese. The primary outcome assessed was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included blood transfusion, pericardial complications, infection/inflammation, removal/revision, and other complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 3832 patients who underwent LPM implantation between 2018 and 2021, weighted to represent 19,610 patients, with 3540 having an appropriate BMI designation. Mortality was lower in the obese group (2.3%) compared to the nonobese group (2.7%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.462, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.259–0.623, <em>P</em> = .009). Compared to the normal weight group, those categorized as overweight, obese, and morbidly obese demonstrated a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.432, 95% CI 0.299–0.734, <em>P</em> = .009; aOR 0.465, 95% CI 0.238–0.721, <em>P</em> <.001; aOR 0.299, 95% CI 0.153–0.586, <em>P</em> <.001, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings support the existence of the obesity paradox in patients with LPM implantation, where higher BMI categories are associated with improved mortality outcomes, meeting our prespecified primary endpoint. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms behind these observations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"5 12","pages":"Pages 883-889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824003209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The adoption of leadless pacemakers (LPMs) is increasing, yet the impact of body mass index (BMI) on procedural outcomes remains underexplored.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of BMI on in-hospital outcomes for patients receiving LPM implantation.
Methods
Data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2018–2021 were analyzed for patients older than 18 years who underwent LPM implantation, with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria applied. Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes and categorized into BMI groups: underweight, normal, overweight, obese, and morbidly obese. The primary outcome assessed was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included blood transfusion, pericardial complications, infection/inflammation, removal/revision, and other complications.
Results
The study included 3832 patients who underwent LPM implantation between 2018 and 2021, weighted to represent 19,610 patients, with 3540 having an appropriate BMI designation. Mortality was lower in the obese group (2.3%) compared to the nonobese group (2.7%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.462, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.259–0.623, P = .009). Compared to the normal weight group, those categorized as overweight, obese, and morbidly obese demonstrated a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.432, 95% CI 0.299–0.734, P = .009; aOR 0.465, 95% CI 0.238–0.721, P <.001; aOR 0.299, 95% CI 0.153–0.586, P <.001, respectively).
Conclusion
These findings support the existence of the obesity paradox in patients with LPM implantation, where higher BMI categories are associated with improved mortality outcomes, meeting our prespecified primary endpoint. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms behind these observations.
背景:无导线起搏器(lpm)的采用越来越多,但身体质量指数(BMI)对手术结果的影响仍未得到充分探讨。目的:本研究的目的是探讨BMI对LPM植入术患者住院结局的影响。方法:分析2018-2021年全国住院患者样本中18岁以上LPM植入患者的数据,并采用特定的纳入和排除标准。使用国际疾病分类第10版代码对患者进行鉴定,并将其分为体重不足、正常、超重、肥胖和病态肥胖组。评估的主要结局是住院死亡率。次要结局包括输血、心包并发症、感染/炎症、手术切除/翻修和其他并发症。结果:该研究纳入了2018年至2021年期间接受LPM植入的3832例患者,加权为19610例患者,其中3540例具有适当的BMI指定。肥胖组的死亡率(2.3%)低于非肥胖组(2.7%)(校正优势比[aOR] 0.462, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.259-0.623, P = 0.009)。与正常体重组相比,超重、肥胖和病态肥胖组的住院死亡风险较低(aOR 0.432, 95% CI 0.299-0.734, P = 0.009;aOR 0.465, 95% CI 0.238-0.721, P P结论:这些发现支持LPM植入患者肥胖悖论的存在,其中较高的BMI类别与改善的死亡率结果相关,符合我们预先设定的主要终点。需要进一步的研究来阐明这些观察结果背后的机制。