A Review of Falls And Injuries Of Nursing Home Residents Presenting To The Emergency Department.

IF 7.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Aoife O'Connor, Claire Noonan, Aoife Fallon, Sean Kennelly
{"title":"A Review of Falls And Injuries Of Nursing Home Residents Presenting To The Emergency Department.","authors":"Aoife O'Connor, Claire Noonan, Aoife Fallon, Sean Kennelly","doi":"10.1093/qjmed/hcaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Falls are frequently reported within the HSE. The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing(TILDA) found that 40% of over 50 s experience a fall in a two year period, with 20% requiring hospital attendance (1). It has been estimated that the cost of injuries related to falls in older people will increase exponentially over the coming years (2). There is no national database in Ireland with statistics for nursing home(NH) residents presenting with falls to our Emergency Departments(ED).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To review the prevalence and risk factors for nursing home patients presenting to the Emergency Department with falls.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective review of all NH presentations to the ED of a university hospital over one year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 519 ED presentations by NH residents over one year. 48.17% (n = 250), presented with a fall. One third of ED visits presented during conventional working hours. Falls patients were more likely to be admitted when not reviewed by a G.P. prior to presentation. The average length of stay for falls admissions was 10.77 days(n = 132), vs 9.56(n = 153) for admissions with no documented fall. There was no statistical difference in the falls risk medications between groups. Patients presenting with falls were more likely to have bone protection reviewed during their stay(P=.011). Patients with falls were also more likely to use mobility aids(P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rapid referral to falls prevention programmes and the use of standardised care pathways for high falls risk patients are essential for future prevention and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20806,"journal":{"name":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaf008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Falls are frequently reported within the HSE. The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing(TILDA) found that 40% of over 50 s experience a fall in a two year period, with 20% requiring hospital attendance (1). It has been estimated that the cost of injuries related to falls in older people will increase exponentially over the coming years (2). There is no national database in Ireland with statistics for nursing home(NH) residents presenting with falls to our Emergency Departments(ED).

Aim: To review the prevalence and risk factors for nursing home patients presenting to the Emergency Department with falls.

Design: Retrospective chart review.

Method: Retrospective review of all NH presentations to the ED of a university hospital over one year.

Results: There were 519 ED presentations by NH residents over one year. 48.17% (n = 250), presented with a fall. One third of ED visits presented during conventional working hours. Falls patients were more likely to be admitted when not reviewed by a G.P. prior to presentation. The average length of stay for falls admissions was 10.77 days(n = 132), vs 9.56(n = 153) for admissions with no documented fall. There was no statistical difference in the falls risk medications between groups. Patients presenting with falls were more likely to have bone protection reviewed during their stay(P=.011). Patients with falls were also more likely to use mobility aids(P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Rapid referral to falls prevention programmes and the use of standardised care pathways for high falls risk patients are essential for future prevention and management.

到急诊科的养老院居民跌倒和受伤的回顾。
背景:在HSE中经常报告跌倒。爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究(TILDA)发现,50岁以上的人中有40%在两年内经历过跌倒,其中20%需要住院治疗(1)。据估计,与老年人跌倒相关的伤害成本在未来几年将呈指数增长(2)。爱尔兰没有国家数据库,其中包括因跌倒而到急诊科(ED)就诊的养老院(NH)居民的统计数据。目的:回顾疗养院病人因跌倒到急诊科就诊的患病率及危险因素。设计:回顾性图表回顾。方法:回顾性分析一年来在某大学医院急诊科就诊的所有NH病例。结果:NH住院医师在一年内有519例ED报告。48.17% (n = 250),表现为跌倒。三分之一的急诊科探访是在正常工作时间进行的。如果在就诊前没有gp检查,跌倒患者更有可能入院。跌倒入院的平均住院时间为10.77天(n = 132),而没有记录在案的跌倒入院的平均住院时间为9.56天(n = 153)。两组患者在服用跌倒风险药物方面没有统计学差异。出现跌倒的患者更有可能在住院期间复查骨骼保护(P= 0.011)。发生跌倒的患者也更有可能使用助行器(结论:快速转诊到跌倒预防方案,并对高跌倒风险患者使用标准化护理途径,对未来的预防和管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
263
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: QJM, a renowned and reputable general medical journal, has been a prominent source of knowledge in the field of internal medicine. With a steadfast commitment to advancing medical science and practice, it features a selection of rigorously reviewed articles. Released on a monthly basis, QJM encompasses a wide range of article types. These include original papers that contribute innovative research, editorials that offer expert opinions, and reviews that provide comprehensive analyses of specific topics. The journal also presents commentary papers aimed at initiating discussions on controversial subjects and allocates a dedicated section for reader correspondence. In summary, QJM's reputable standing stems from its enduring presence in the medical community, consistent publication schedule, and diverse range of content designed to inform and engage readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信