Prevalence of and factors associated with formula feeding among mothers with infants 0-6 months of age in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Zenebe Abebe Gebreegziabher, Birhan Ewunu Semagn, Agmasie Damtew Walle, Werkneh Melkie Tilahun, Mahider Awoke Belay, Wubet Tazeb Wondie, Gezahagn Demsu Gedefaw, Tadesse Mamo Dejene, Fitsum Zekarias Mohammed
{"title":"Prevalence of and factors associated with formula feeding among mothers with infants 0-6 months of age in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Zenebe Abebe Gebreegziabher, Birhan Ewunu Semagn, Agmasie Damtew Walle, Werkneh Melkie Tilahun, Mahider Awoke Belay, Wubet Tazeb Wondie, Gezahagn Demsu Gedefaw, Tadesse Mamo Dejene, Fitsum Zekarias Mohammed","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Inconsistent results have been reported regarding the prevalence of and factors associated with formula feeding in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of and factors associated with formula feeding among mothers with infants 0-6 months of age in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive systematic search was conducted across 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect) and the Google Scholar search engine to identify relevant studies published up to April 2, 2024.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>After assessing the quality of each study using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Prevalence Studies, data were independently extracted by 2 authors using pre-designed forms in an Excel spreadsheet. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion and consultation with additional authors.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the I2 statistic. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the proportions, due to high heterogeneity, while a fixed-effect meta-analysis was used to pool associated factors with low heterogeneity. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the potential impact of outlier studies on the overall estimates. Five studies, with a combined sample size of 2344 participants, were included. The pooled prevalence of formula feeding was 34.0% (95% CI: 23.0%, 44.0%). Factors significantly associated with formula feeding included cesarean delivery (POR [pooled odds ratio] = 4.72, 95% CI: 3.32, 6.71) compared with vaginal delivery, a positive attitude toward formula feeding (POR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.45, 3.53) compared with a negative attitude, initiation of breastfeeding more than 1 hour after delivery (POR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.25, 4.13) compared with initiation within 1 hour, and receiving information about formula feeding from friends or family (POR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.46, 4.20) compared with receiving information from health-care professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of formula feeding in Ethiopia is significant. Cesarean delivery, a positive attitude toward formula feeding, late initiation of breastfeeding, and receiving formula feeding-related information from friends and family were positively associated with formula feeding. Given these findings, the authors recommend that public health interventions in Ethiopia target these key determinants to decrease the high prevalence of formula feeding practices observed in the country. Strategies addressing factors such as promoting vaginal delivery, improving attitudes toward breastfeeding, encouraging early breastfeeding initiation, and limiting the influence of social networks on formula-feeding decisions may be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Inconsistent results have been reported regarding the prevalence of and factors associated with formula feeding in Ethiopia.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of and factors associated with formula feeding among mothers with infants 0-6 months of age in Ethiopia.

Data sources: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted across 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect) and the Google Scholar search engine to identify relevant studies published up to April 2, 2024.

Data extraction: After assessing the quality of each study using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Prevalence Studies, data were independently extracted by 2 authors using pre-designed forms in an Excel spreadsheet. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion and consultation with additional authors.

Data analysis: Statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the I2 statistic. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the proportions, due to high heterogeneity, while a fixed-effect meta-analysis was used to pool associated factors with low heterogeneity. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the potential impact of outlier studies on the overall estimates. Five studies, with a combined sample size of 2344 participants, were included. The pooled prevalence of formula feeding was 34.0% (95% CI: 23.0%, 44.0%). Factors significantly associated with formula feeding included cesarean delivery (POR [pooled odds ratio] = 4.72, 95% CI: 3.32, 6.71) compared with vaginal delivery, a positive attitude toward formula feeding (POR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.45, 3.53) compared with a negative attitude, initiation of breastfeeding more than 1 hour after delivery (POR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.25, 4.13) compared with initiation within 1 hour, and receiving information about formula feeding from friends or family (POR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.46, 4.20) compared with receiving information from health-care professionals.

Conclusion: The prevalence of formula feeding in Ethiopia is significant. Cesarean delivery, a positive attitude toward formula feeding, late initiation of breastfeeding, and receiving formula feeding-related information from friends and family were positively associated with formula feeding. Given these findings, the authors recommend that public health interventions in Ethiopia target these key determinants to decrease the high prevalence of formula feeding practices observed in the country. Strategies addressing factors such as promoting vaginal delivery, improving attitudes toward breastfeeding, encouraging early breastfeeding initiation, and limiting the influence of social networks on formula-feeding decisions may be beneficial.

埃塞俄比亚0-6个月婴儿的母亲中配方奶喂养的流行率及其相关因素:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:关于埃塞俄比亚配方奶喂养的流行程度及其相关因素的报告结果不一致。目的:本研究旨在确定埃塞俄比亚0-6个月婴儿的母亲中配方奶喂养的总体患病率及其相关因素。数据来源:通过3个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE和ScienceDirect)和谷歌Scholar搜索引擎进行了全面的系统检索,以确定截至2024年4月2日发表的相关研究。数据提取:在使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所流行病学研究关键评估清单评估每个研究的质量后,由2位作者使用预先设计的表格在Excel电子表格中独立提取数据。任何分歧都通过与其他作者的讨论和协商来解决。数据分析:使用I2统计量评估各研究的统计异质性。由于异质性高,随机效应荟萃分析用于汇总比例,而固定效应荟萃分析用于汇总异质性低的相关因素。进行敏感性分析以评估离群研究对总体估计值的潜在影响。其中包括5项研究,总共有2344名参与者。配方奶喂养的总患病率为34.0% (95% CI: 23.0%, 44.0%)。与配方奶喂养显著相关的因素包括:剖宫产(POR[合并优势比]= 4.72,95% CI: 3.32, 6.71)与阴道分娩相比;对配方奶喂养持积极态度(POR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.45, 3.53)与持消极态度相比;产后开始母乳喂养超过1小时(POR = 2.27, 95% CI:1.25, 4.13)和从朋友或家人那里获得关于配方奶喂养的信息(POR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.46, 4.20)相比,从卫生保健专业人员那里获得信息。结论:配方奶喂养在埃塞俄比亚的流行程度显著。剖宫产、对配方奶喂养持积极态度、开始母乳喂养较晚以及从朋友和家人那里获得配方奶喂养相关信息与配方奶喂养呈正相关。鉴于这些发现,作者建议埃塞俄比亚的公共卫生干预措施针对这些关键决定因素,以降低该国观察到的配方喂养做法的高流行率。解决诸如促进阴道分娩、改善对母乳喂养的态度、鼓励早期开始母乳喂养以及限制社会网络对配方喂养决定的影响等因素的战略可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信