Pragmatic algorithm for visual assessment of 4-Repeat tauopathies in [18F]PI-2620 PET Scans.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Theresa Bauer, Matthias Brendel, Mirlind Zaganjori, Alexander M Bernhardt, Alexander Jäck, Sophia Stöcklein, Maximilian Scheifele, Johannes Levin, Thilo van Eimeren, Alexander Drzezga, Osama Sabri, Henryk Barthel, Robert Perneczky, Günter Höglinger, Nicolai Franzmeier, Johannes Gnörich
{"title":"Pragmatic algorithm for visual assessment of 4-Repeat tauopathies in [<sup>18</sup>F]PI-2620 PET Scans.","authors":"Theresa Bauer, Matthias Brendel, Mirlind Zaganjori, Alexander M Bernhardt, Alexander Jäck, Sophia Stöcklein, Maximilian Scheifele, Johannes Levin, Thilo van Eimeren, Alexander Drzezga, Osama Sabri, Henryk Barthel, Robert Perneczky, Günter Höglinger, Nicolai Franzmeier, Johannes Gnörich","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Standardized evaluation of [<sup>18</sup>F]PI-2620 tau-PET scans in 4R-tauopathies represents an unmet need in clinical practice. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of visual evaluation of [<sup>18</sup>F]PI-2620 images for diagnosing 4R-tauopathies and to develop a straight-forward reading algorithm to improve objectivity and data reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 83 individuals with [<sup>18</sup>F]PI-2620 PET scans were included. Participants were classified as probable 4R-tauopathies (n = 29), Alzheimer's disease (AD) (n = 20), α-synucleinopathies (n = 15), and healthy controls (n = 19) based on clinical criteria. Visual assessment of tau-PET scans (choice: 4R-tauopathy, AD-tauopathy, no-tauopathy) was conducted using either 20-40-minute or 40-60-minute intervals, with raw (common) and cerebellar grey matter scaled standardized reading settings (intensity-scaled). Two readers evaluated scans independently and blinded, with a third reader providing consensus in case of discrepant primary evaluation. A regional analysis was performed using the cortex, basal ganglia, midbrain, and dentate nucleus. Sensitivity, specificity, and interrater agreement were calculated for all settings and compared against the visual reads of parametric images (0-60-minutes, distribution volume ratios, DVR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with 4R-tauopathies in contrast to non-4R-tauopathies were detected at higher sensitivity in the 20-40-minute frame (common: 79%, scaled: 76%) compared to the 40-60-minute frame (common: 55%, scaled: 62%), albeit with reduced specificity in the common setting (20-40-min: 78%, 40-60-min: 95%), which was ameliorated in the intensity-scaled setting (20-40-min: 91%, 40-60-min: 96%). Combined assessment of multiple brain regions did not significantly improve diagnostic sensitivity, compared to assessing the basal ganglia alone (76% each). Evaluation of intensity-scaled parametric images resulted in higher sensitivity compared to intensity-scaled static scans (86% vs. 76%) at similar specificity (89% vs. 91%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Visual reading of [<sup>18</sup>F]PI-2620 tau-PET scans demonstrated reliable detection of 4R-tauopathies, particularly when standardized processing methods and early imaging windows were employed. Parametric images should be preferred for visual assessment of 4R-tauopathies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":" ","pages":"121001"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Standardized evaluation of [18F]PI-2620 tau-PET scans in 4R-tauopathies represents an unmet need in clinical practice. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of visual evaluation of [18F]PI-2620 images for diagnosing 4R-tauopathies and to develop a straight-forward reading algorithm to improve objectivity and data reproducibility.

Methods: A total of 83 individuals with [18F]PI-2620 PET scans were included. Participants were classified as probable 4R-tauopathies (n = 29), Alzheimer's disease (AD) (n = 20), α-synucleinopathies (n = 15), and healthy controls (n = 19) based on clinical criteria. Visual assessment of tau-PET scans (choice: 4R-tauopathy, AD-tauopathy, no-tauopathy) was conducted using either 20-40-minute or 40-60-minute intervals, with raw (common) and cerebellar grey matter scaled standardized reading settings (intensity-scaled). Two readers evaluated scans independently and blinded, with a third reader providing consensus in case of discrepant primary evaluation. A regional analysis was performed using the cortex, basal ganglia, midbrain, and dentate nucleus. Sensitivity, specificity, and interrater agreement were calculated for all settings and compared against the visual reads of parametric images (0-60-minutes, distribution volume ratios, DVR).

Results: Patients with 4R-tauopathies in contrast to non-4R-tauopathies were detected at higher sensitivity in the 20-40-minute frame (common: 79%, scaled: 76%) compared to the 40-60-minute frame (common: 55%, scaled: 62%), albeit with reduced specificity in the common setting (20-40-min: 78%, 40-60-min: 95%), which was ameliorated in the intensity-scaled setting (20-40-min: 91%, 40-60-min: 96%). Combined assessment of multiple brain regions did not significantly improve diagnostic sensitivity, compared to assessing the basal ganglia alone (76% each). Evaluation of intensity-scaled parametric images resulted in higher sensitivity compared to intensity-scaled static scans (86% vs. 76%) at similar specificity (89% vs. 91%).

Conclusion: Visual reading of [18F]PI-2620 tau-PET scans demonstrated reliable detection of 4R-tauopathies, particularly when standardized processing methods and early imaging windows were employed. Parametric images should be preferred for visual assessment of 4R-tauopathies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroImage
NeuroImage 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
809
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信