Multiple sclerosis twin study reveals distinct genetic, disease-specific, and psychometric impact on coping with critical life events.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of the Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2024.123381
Daniel Engels, Andrea Flierl-Hecht, Gabriela Shalaginova, Stephanie Rek, Daniel Keeser, Matthias A Reinhard, Frank Padberg, Tania Kümpfel, Lisa Ann Gerdes
{"title":"Multiple sclerosis twin study reveals distinct genetic, disease-specific, and psychometric impact on coping with critical life events.","authors":"Daniel Engels, Andrea Flierl-Hecht, Gabriela Shalaginova, Stephanie Rek, Daniel Keeser, Matthias A Reinhard, Frank Padberg, Tania Kümpfel, Lisa Ann Gerdes","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2024.123381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critical life events challenge our competence to develop coping strategies. In people with multiple sclerosis (MS), the impact of genetics, disease-specific, and psychometric factors on coping strategies have not been explored to date.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a unique cohort of 56 monozygotic twins discordant for MS, we applied comprehensive psychometric and clinical testing to measure factors influencing the psychosocial impact (including stressors and coping strategies) of a critical life event, exemplified by the COVID-19 pandemic (measured by the COVID-19 Pandemic Mental Health Questionnaire, CoPaQ). CoPaQ results were compared to an independent age- and sex-matched control cohort. We applied factor analysis, structural equation modeling, hypothesis testing, and regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We detected no differences in the perception of 14 CoPaQ subscales between MS and non-MS co-twins. However, compared to the independent control group, MS co-twins valued 5/14 CoPaQ subscales differently. Strong perception of pandemic-related stressors in MS co-twins was accompanied by higher HADS-Anxiety (ρ = 0.69, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), HADS-Depression (ρ = 0.57), BDI-II (ρ = 0.74, Beck Depression Inventory), and MSIS-29-psychological scores (ρ = 0.58, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale 29). In a generalized linear mixed model, individuals who perceived pandemic-related stressors as more burdensome relied on inner resources, with a notable dependency on twinship.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Using a unique twin approach, our study suggests that coping with critical life events is mainly driven by the genetic background. However, in people with MS, coping and the perception of stressors is further confounded by psychometric and disease-related factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":"469 ","pages":"123381"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2024.123381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Critical life events challenge our competence to develop coping strategies. In people with multiple sclerosis (MS), the impact of genetics, disease-specific, and psychometric factors on coping strategies have not been explored to date.

Methods: In a unique cohort of 56 monozygotic twins discordant for MS, we applied comprehensive psychometric and clinical testing to measure factors influencing the psychosocial impact (including stressors and coping strategies) of a critical life event, exemplified by the COVID-19 pandemic (measured by the COVID-19 Pandemic Mental Health Questionnaire, CoPaQ). CoPaQ results were compared to an independent age- and sex-matched control cohort. We applied factor analysis, structural equation modeling, hypothesis testing, and regression models.

Results: We detected no differences in the perception of 14 CoPaQ subscales between MS and non-MS co-twins. However, compared to the independent control group, MS co-twins valued 5/14 CoPaQ subscales differently. Strong perception of pandemic-related stressors in MS co-twins was accompanied by higher HADS-Anxiety (ρ = 0.69, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), HADS-Depression (ρ = 0.57), BDI-II (ρ = 0.74, Beck Depression Inventory), and MSIS-29-psychological scores (ρ = 0.58, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale 29). In a generalized linear mixed model, individuals who perceived pandemic-related stressors as more burdensome relied on inner resources, with a notable dependency on twinship.

Discussion: Using a unique twin approach, our study suggests that coping with critical life events is mainly driven by the genetic background. However, in people with MS, coping and the perception of stressors is further confounded by psychometric and disease-related factors.

多发性硬化症双胞胎研究揭示了不同的遗传、疾病特异性和心理测量对应对关键生活事件的影响。
背景:生活中的重大事件对我们制定应对策略的能力提出了挑战。在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中,遗传、疾病特异性和心理测量因素对应对策略的影响迄今尚未得到探讨:方法:在一个由 56 对多发性硬化症不一致的单卵双生子组成的独特队列中,我们采用了全面的心理测量和临床测试来测量影响重大生活事件的心理社会影响(包括压力源和应对策略)的因素,以 COVID-19 大流行为例(通过 COVID-19 大流行心理健康问卷 CoPaQ 测量)。我们将 CoPaQ 的结果与年龄和性别匹配的独立对照组进行了比较。我们采用了因子分析、结构方程建模、假设检验和回归模型:结果:我们发现,多发性硬化症患者和非多发性硬化症患者的同卵双胞胎对 14 个 CoPaQ 分量表的感知没有差异。然而,与独立对照组相比,多发性硬化症同卵双胞胎对 5/14 个 CoPaQ 分量表的评价有所不同。多发性硬化症同卵双胞胎对流行病相关压力源的强烈感知伴随着较高的 HADS-焦虑(ρ = 0.69,医院焦虑和抑郁量表)、HADS-抑郁(ρ = 0.57)、BDI-II(ρ = 0.74,贝克抑郁量表)和 MSIS-29 心理评分(ρ = 0.58,多发性硬化症影响量表 29)。在广义线性混合模型中,认为与大流行病相关的压力负担更重的个体依赖于内在资源,这与双胞胎关系有明显的依赖性:我们的研究采用独特的双胞胎方法,表明应对关键生活事件主要受遗传背景的驱动。然而,对于多发性硬化症患者来说,心理测量和疾病相关因素会进一步影响他们对压力源的应对和感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
313
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials). JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信