Sebastien Gendarme MD , Ehsan Irajizad PhD , James P. Long PhD , Johannes F. Fahrmann PhD , Jennifer B. Dennison PhD , Seyyed Mahmood Ghasemi PhD , Rongzhang Dou MD, PhD , Robert J. Volk PhD , Rafael Meza PhD , Iakovos Toumazis PhD , Florence Canoui-Poitrine MD, PhD , Samir M. Hanash MD, PhD , Edwin J. Ostrin MD, PhD
{"title":"Impact of Comorbidities on the Mortality Benefits of Lung Cancer Screening: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the PLCO and NLST Trials","authors":"Sebastien Gendarme MD , Ehsan Irajizad PhD , James P. Long PhD , Johannes F. Fahrmann PhD , Jennifer B. Dennison PhD , Seyyed Mahmood Ghasemi PhD , Rongzhang Dou MD, PhD , Robert J. Volk PhD , Rafael Meza PhD , Iakovos Toumazis PhD , Florence Canoui-Poitrine MD, PhD , Samir M. Hanash MD, PhD , Edwin J. Ostrin MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtho.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate how comorbidities affect mortality benefits of lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed a comorbidity index (Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian comorbidity index [PLCO-ci]) using LCS-eligible participants’ data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) trial (training set) and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) (validation set). PLCO-ci predicts five-year non–lung cancer (LC) mortality using a regularized Cox model; with performance evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. In NLST, LC mortality (per original publication) was compared between low-dose computed tomography and chest radiograph arms across the PLCO-ci quintile (Q1–5) using a cause-specific hazard ratio (csHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analyses included 34,690 PLCO and 53,452 NLST participants (mean age: 62 y [±5 y] and 61 y [±5 y], 58% and 59% male individuals, and 39% and 41% active smokers, respectively). PLCO-ci predicted five-year non-LC mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.71–0.74) in PLCO and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.67–0.70) in NLST. In NLST, at a median follow-up of 6.5 years, LC mortality was significantly reduced for participants with intermediate comorbidity (Q2, Q3, and Q4): csHR 0.62 (95% CI: 0.41–0.95), 0.68 (95% CI: 0.48–0.96), and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.54–0.96) respectively, with a nonstatistically significant reduction for Q1 (csHR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.45–1.17) and no reduction for Q5 participants (csHR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.79–1.23). Participants in Q2, Q3, and Q4 (60%) accounted for 89% of LC deaths averted among all NLST participants. Q1 participants had low LC incidence, whereas Q5 had higher localized LC lethality, more squamous cell carcinomas, and untreated LC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PLCO-ci developed in this work shows that individuals with intermediate comorbidity benefited the most from LCS, highlighting the need of addressing comorbidities to achieve LC mortality benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17515,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","volume":"20 5","pages":"Pages 565-576"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556086425000048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate how comorbidities affect mortality benefits of lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography.
Methods
We developed a comorbidity index (Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian comorbidity index [PLCO-ci]) using LCS-eligible participants’ data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) trial (training set) and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) (validation set). PLCO-ci predicts five-year non–lung cancer (LC) mortality using a regularized Cox model; with performance evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. In NLST, LC mortality (per original publication) was compared between low-dose computed tomography and chest radiograph arms across the PLCO-ci quintile (Q1–5) using a cause-specific hazard ratio (csHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Analyses included 34,690 PLCO and 53,452 NLST participants (mean age: 62 y [±5 y] and 61 y [±5 y], 58% and 59% male individuals, and 39% and 41% active smokers, respectively). PLCO-ci predicted five-year non-LC mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.71–0.74) in PLCO and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.67–0.70) in NLST. In NLST, at a median follow-up of 6.5 years, LC mortality was significantly reduced for participants with intermediate comorbidity (Q2, Q3, and Q4): csHR 0.62 (95% CI: 0.41–0.95), 0.68 (95% CI: 0.48–0.96), and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.54–0.96) respectively, with a nonstatistically significant reduction for Q1 (csHR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.45–1.17) and no reduction for Q5 participants (csHR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.79–1.23). Participants in Q2, Q3, and Q4 (60%) accounted for 89% of LC deaths averted among all NLST participants. Q1 participants had low LC incidence, whereas Q5 had higher localized LC lethality, more squamous cell carcinomas, and untreated LC.
Conclusions
The PLCO-ci developed in this work shows that individuals with intermediate comorbidity benefited the most from LCS, highlighting the need of addressing comorbidities to achieve LC mortality benefits.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Thoracic Oncology (JTO), the official journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer,is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to the prevention, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of all thoracic malignancies.The readship includes epidemiologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pulmonologists, radiologists, pathologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and research scientists with a special interest in thoracic oncology.