Factors Associated With Minority Patient Enrollment in a Gastric Cancer Biobank.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Morgan F Pettigrew, Amr I Al Abbas, Anida Southichack, Michelle R Ju, Suntrea T G Hammer, Yulun Liu, Matthew R Porembka, Sam C Wang
{"title":"Factors Associated With Minority Patient Enrollment in a Gastric Cancer Biobank.","authors":"Morgan F Pettigrew, Amr I Al Abbas, Anida Southichack, Michelle R Ju, Suntrea T G Hammer, Yulun Liu, Matthew R Porembka, Sam C Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Human tissue samples are essential for translational cancer research. However, less than 20% of current biobank and genomic samples were obtained from minority patients, which may lead to biased understanding of cancer biology. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with patient enrollment in our institution's gastric cancer biobank.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with suspected or confirmed gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer undergoing surgical procedures at our institution were invited to enroll in a prospective gastric cancer biobank. We retrospectively reviewed patients who were invited to enroll from 2017 to 2023 at our safety-net and university hospitals. We compared patients who enrolled to those who declined to identify factors that predict enrollment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hispanic patients had similar odds of enrollment as non-Hispanic White patients (odds ratio (OR): 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54-2.73, P = 0.63). Non-Hispanic minorities (Black/African Americans and Asians) were less likely to enroll when compared to non-Hispanic Whites (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18-0.95, P = 0.04). Minority patients treated at our safety-net hospital had higher odds of enrollment than those treated at our university hospital (OR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.11-5.99, P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts to improve diversity in biomedical research cannot consider minority patients as a monolithic cohort. Instead, targeted interventions that address diverse cultural concerns and improve access to enrollment at safety-net centers are requisite.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"306 ","pages":"230-238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Human tissue samples are essential for translational cancer research. However, less than 20% of current biobank and genomic samples were obtained from minority patients, which may lead to biased understanding of cancer biology. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with patient enrollment in our institution's gastric cancer biobank.

Methods: Patients with suspected or confirmed gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer undergoing surgical procedures at our institution were invited to enroll in a prospective gastric cancer biobank. We retrospectively reviewed patients who were invited to enroll from 2017 to 2023 at our safety-net and university hospitals. We compared patients who enrolled to those who declined to identify factors that predict enrollment.

Results: Hispanic patients had similar odds of enrollment as non-Hispanic White patients (odds ratio (OR): 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54-2.73, P = 0.63). Non-Hispanic minorities (Black/African Americans and Asians) were less likely to enroll when compared to non-Hispanic Whites (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18-0.95, P = 0.04). Minority patients treated at our safety-net hospital had higher odds of enrollment than those treated at our university hospital (OR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.11-5.99, P = 0.02).

Conclusions: Efforts to improve diversity in biomedical research cannot consider minority patients as a monolithic cohort. Instead, targeted interventions that address diverse cultural concerns and improve access to enrollment at safety-net centers are requisite.

少数民族患者入组胃癌生物库的相关因素
人体组织样本对转化性癌症研究至关重要。然而,目前不到20%的生物库和基因组样本来自少数患者,这可能导致对癌症生物学的理解存在偏见。本研究的目的是确定患者入组我院胃癌生物库的相关因素。方法:在我院接受外科手术的疑似或确诊胃癌或胃食管结癌患者被邀请加入前瞻性胃癌生物库。我们回顾性回顾了2017年至2023年在我们的安全网和大学医院受邀入组的患者。我们比较了入组的患者和拒绝入组的患者,以确定预测入组的因素。结果:西班牙裔患者与非西班牙裔白人患者的入组几率相似(优势比(OR): 1.22, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.54-2.73, P = 0.63)。与非西班牙裔白人相比,非西班牙裔少数民族(黑人/非裔美国人和亚洲人)注册的可能性更低(OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18-0.95, P = 0.04)。在我们的安全网医院治疗的少数民族患者的入组率高于在我们大学医院治疗的患者(OR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.11-5.99, P = 0.02)。结论:提高生物医学研究多样性的努力不能将少数患者视为一个单一的队列。相反,必须采取有针对性的干预措施,解决各种文化问题,并改善在安全网中心登记的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信