Understanding the regulatory-procurement interface for medicines in Africa via publicly available information on standards, implementation, and enforcement in five countries.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2436898
Jillian C Kohler, Mariangela Castro-Arteaga, Saher Panjwani, David Mukanga, Murray M Lumpkin, Bonface Fundafunda, Anthony B Kapeta, Chimwemwe Chamdimba, Anna S Y Wong, Kristin N Harper, Charles Preston
{"title":"Understanding the regulatory-procurement interface for medicines in Africa via publicly available information on standards, implementation, and enforcement in five countries.","authors":"Jillian C Kohler, Mariangela Castro-Arteaga, Saher Panjwani, David Mukanga, Murray M Lumpkin, Bonface Fundafunda, Anthony B Kapeta, Chimwemwe Chamdimba, Anna S Y Wong, Kristin N Harper, Charles Preston","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2436898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substandard and falsified medicines in Africa are a major public health concern. Access to quality medical products in African countries is governed in large part by two major entities at the national level: the regulatory authority and the procurement agency. The importance of national regulators in ensuring quality medical products is well known. The interplay between the national regulator and the national procurement agency also has a significant impact on access to quality medicines but is less understood. This study's aim was to characterise the regulatory-procurement interface - the intersection of decision-making in these two spheres - using publicly available data from five African countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the five target countries, we adapted criteria from WHO's 2018 <i>Pharmaceutical System Transparency and Accountability Assessment Tool</i> to identify key national policies and practices around the nexus of medicines regulation and procurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Though legal and policy frameworks enabling best practices in procurement were often in place, implementation and enforcement of these practices appear to be key areas for strengthening. In addition, we documented a lack of publicly available information related to the role that quality plays in selecting medical products. Finally, none of the five countries have publicly published the results of their selection decisions with key product details, making it difficult to assess whether basic quality standards are being met.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these findings, one of the most important next steps for improving the effectiveness and transparency of national procurement is for procurement agencies to publish detailed quality selection criteria and an up-to-date list of the medical products they have purchased, with key product information. We hope these findings can help inform the conversation about implementing and enforcing best practices at the regulatory-procurement interface, with the goal of improving access to quality versions of medical products in Africa and globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2436898"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2436898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Substandard and falsified medicines in Africa are a major public health concern. Access to quality medical products in African countries is governed in large part by two major entities at the national level: the regulatory authority and the procurement agency. The importance of national regulators in ensuring quality medical products is well known. The interplay between the national regulator and the national procurement agency also has a significant impact on access to quality medicines but is less understood. This study's aim was to characterise the regulatory-procurement interface - the intersection of decision-making in these two spheres - using publicly available data from five African countries.

Methods: For the five target countries, we adapted criteria from WHO's 2018 Pharmaceutical System Transparency and Accountability Assessment Tool to identify key national policies and practices around the nexus of medicines regulation and procurement.

Results: Though legal and policy frameworks enabling best practices in procurement were often in place, implementation and enforcement of these practices appear to be key areas for strengthening. In addition, we documented a lack of publicly available information related to the role that quality plays in selecting medical products. Finally, none of the five countries have publicly published the results of their selection decisions with key product details, making it difficult to assess whether basic quality standards are being met.

Conclusion: Based on these findings, one of the most important next steps for improving the effectiveness and transparency of national procurement is for procurement agencies to publish detailed quality selection criteria and an up-to-date list of the medical products they have purchased, with key product information. We hope these findings can help inform the conversation about implementing and enforcing best practices at the regulatory-procurement interface, with the goal of improving access to quality versions of medical products in Africa and globally.

通过有关五个国家的标准、实施和执法的公开信息,了解非洲药品的监管采购界面。
背景:非洲的劣药和假药是一个主要的公共卫生问题。在非洲国家,获得高质量医疗产品在很大程度上由国家一级的两个主要实体管理:监管机构和采购机构。国家监管机构在确保医疗产品质量方面的重要性是众所周知的。国家监管机构和国家采购机构之间的相互作用也对获得高质量药品产生重大影响,但人们对其了解较少。这项研究的目的是利用来自五个非洲国家的公开数据来描述管理-采购界面——这两个领域决策的交集。方法:对于五个目标国家,我们采用了世卫组织《2018年药品系统透明度和问责制评估工具》中的标准,以确定围绕药品监管和采购关系的关键国家政策和做法。结果:虽然在采购方面往往有促进最佳做法的法律和政策框架,但这些做法的实施和执行似乎是需要加强的关键领域。此外,我们记录了缺乏与质量在选择医疗产品中所起作用相关的公开信息。最后,这五个国家都没有公开公布其产品关键细节的选择决定结果,这使得很难评估是否达到了基本的质量标准。结论:根据这些发现,提高国家采购效率和透明度的最重要的下一步措施之一是采购机构公布详细的质量选择标准和最新的采购医疗产品清单,并提供关键产品信息。我们希望这些调查结果有助于为在监管采购界面实施和执行最佳做法的对话提供信息,目的是改善非洲和全球获得高质量医疗产品的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信