Electrocardiogram-based machine learning for risk stratification of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

IF 37.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Zeineb Bouzid, Ervin Sejdic, Christian Martin-Gill, Ziad Faramand, Stephanie Frisch, Mohammad Alrawashdeh, Stephanie Helman, Tanmay A Gokhale, Nathan T Riek, Karina Kraevsky-Phillips, Richard E Gregg, Susan M Sereika, Gilles Clermont, Murat Akcakaya, Jessica K Zègre-Hemsey, Samir Saba, Clifton W Callaway, Salah S Al-Zaiti
{"title":"Electrocardiogram-based machine learning for risk stratification of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.","authors":"Zeineb Bouzid, Ervin Sejdic, Christian Martin-Gill, Ziad Faramand, Stephanie Frisch, Mohammad Alrawashdeh, Stephanie Helman, Tanmay A Gokhale, Nathan T Riek, Karina Kraevsky-Phillips, Richard E Gregg, Susan M Sereika, Gilles Clermont, Murat Akcakaya, Jessica K Zègre-Hemsey, Samir Saba, Clifton W Callaway, Salah S Al-Zaiti","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehae880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The importance of risk stratification in patients with chest pain extends beyond diagnosis and immediate treatment. This study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of electrocardiogram feature-based machine learning models to risk-stratify all-cause mortality in those with chest pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive, non-traumatic patients with chest pain. All-cause death was ascertained from multiple sources, including the CDC National Death Index registry. Six machine learning models were trained for survival analysis using 73 morphological electrocardiogram features (80% training with 10-fold cross-validation and 20% testing), followed by a variational Bayesian Gaussian mixture model to define distinct risk groups. The resulting classification performance was compared against the HEART score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The derivation cohort included 4015 patients (age 59 ± 16 years, 47% women). The mortality rate was 20.3% after a median follow-up period of 3.05 years (interquartile range 1.75-5.32). Extra Survival Trees outperformed other forecasting models, and the derived risk groups successfully classified patients into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups (log-rank test statistic = 121.14, P < .001). This model outperformed the HEART score, reducing the rate of missed events by >90% with a negative predictive value and sensitivity of 93.4% and 85.9%, compared to 89.0% and 75.0%, respectively. In an independent external testing cohort (N = 3095, age 59 ± 15 years, 44% women, 30-day mortality 3.5%), patients in the moderate [odds ratio 3.62 (1.35-9.74)] and high [odds ratio 6.12 (2.38-15.75)] risk groups had significantly higher odds of mortality compared to those in the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The externally validated machine learning-based model, exclusively utilizing features from the 12-lead electrocardiogram, outperformed the HEART score in stratifying the mortality risk of patients with acute chest pain. This may have the potential to impact the precision of care delivery and the allocation of resources to those at highest risk of adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":37.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae880","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The importance of risk stratification in patients with chest pain extends beyond diagnosis and immediate treatment. This study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of electrocardiogram feature-based machine learning models to risk-stratify all-cause mortality in those with chest pain.

Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive, non-traumatic patients with chest pain. All-cause death was ascertained from multiple sources, including the CDC National Death Index registry. Six machine learning models were trained for survival analysis using 73 morphological electrocardiogram features (80% training with 10-fold cross-validation and 20% testing), followed by a variational Bayesian Gaussian mixture model to define distinct risk groups. The resulting classification performance was compared against the HEART score.

Results: The derivation cohort included 4015 patients (age 59 ± 16 years, 47% women). The mortality rate was 20.3% after a median follow-up period of 3.05 years (interquartile range 1.75-5.32). Extra Survival Trees outperformed other forecasting models, and the derived risk groups successfully classified patients into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups (log-rank test statistic = 121.14, P < .001). This model outperformed the HEART score, reducing the rate of missed events by >90% with a negative predictive value and sensitivity of 93.4% and 85.9%, compared to 89.0% and 75.0%, respectively. In an independent external testing cohort (N = 3095, age 59 ± 15 years, 44% women, 30-day mortality 3.5%), patients in the moderate [odds ratio 3.62 (1.35-9.74)] and high [odds ratio 6.12 (2.38-15.75)] risk groups had significantly higher odds of mortality compared to those in the low-risk group.

Conclusions: The externally validated machine learning-based model, exclusively utilizing features from the 12-lead electrocardiogram, outperformed the HEART score in stratifying the mortality risk of patients with acute chest pain. This may have the potential to impact the precision of care delivery and the allocation of resources to those at highest risk of adverse events.

基于心电图的机器学习对疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者进行风险分层。
背景和目的:胸痛患者风险分层的重要性超出了诊断和立即治疗。本研究旨在评估基于心电图特征的机器学习模型对胸痛患者全因死亡率进行风险分层的预后价值。方法:这是一项前瞻性观察队列研究,研究对象为连续的非创伤性胸痛患者。全因死亡由多种来源确定,包括疾病预防控制中心国家死亡指数登记处。使用73个形态学心电图特征训练6个机器学习模型进行生存分析(80%训练,10倍交叉验证和20%测试),然后使用变分贝叶斯高斯混合模型定义不同的风险组。将结果分类性能与HEART评分进行比较。结果:衍生队列包括4015例患者(年龄59±16岁,女性47%)。中位随访期为3.05年(四分位数范围1.75-5.32),死亡率为20.3%。额外生存树优于其他预测模型,衍生的风险组成功地将患者分为低、中、高风险组(log-rank检验统计量= 121.14,P < .001)。该模型优于HEART评分,将遗漏事件率降低了90%,阴性预测值和敏感性分别为93.4%和85.9%,而后者分别为89.0%和75.0%。在一个独立的外部检测队列中(N = 3095,年龄59±15岁,44%女性,30天死亡率3.5%),中等[比值比3.62(1.35-9.74)]和高[比值比6.12(2.38-15.75)]危险组患者的死亡率明显高于低危险组。结论:外部验证的基于机器学习的模型,专门利用12导联心电图的特征,在急性胸痛患者的死亡风险分层方面优于HEART评分。这可能会影响到医疗服务的准确性和对那些不良事件风险最高的人的资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信