Tattoo ink products and pigments 2018-19 upfront the new EUREACH regulation: Danish golden benchmark Study of 108 studios and 39687 clients tattooed with inks from 109720 ink bottles.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1159/000543455
Jørgen Vedelskov Serup, Bjørn Christian Severin, Esben Hammershøy
{"title":"Tattoo ink products and pigments 2018-19 upfront the new EUREACH regulation: Danish golden benchmark Study of 108 studios and 39687 clients tattooed with inks from 109720 ink bottles.","authors":"Jørgen Vedelskov Serup, Bjørn Christian Severin, Esben Hammershøy","doi":"10.1159/000543455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The new EU regulation on tattoo inks in force January 2022 in a hitherto unregulated market marks a historical change.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mapping of the thousands of tattoo inks de facto used in studios before the new EU regulation and establish a historical reference to tattoo customer exposure, ink toxicology assessment, clinical complications, and the impact on tattooing businesses.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A tattooist-operated electronic system (InkBase) for ink registration required by law is used in Denmark since 2018. A local database in studios refers to a central database. Clients, sessions, ink bottles, brand name, and pigment color index (CI) are registered. Person's data protection is respected. Tracing harmful inks is possible, with public warning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Registrations from 108 studios employing about 700 tattooists were collected from March 2018 through 2019. 39687 clients were tattooed in 50604 sessions, using colors from 109720 ink bottles. 10833 were CI-labelled identifying the pigment. 98.1% of inks originated from USA. Detailed statistics on inks and pigments used are provided as a benchmark showing the spontaneous use and preference of \"old\" tattoo inks before the EU regulation compulsory to member states introduced dramatic restrictions difficult to follow.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Denmark can, having detailed ink registration enforced by law and having a commonly used electronic registration system reporting to a central server, function as an index country in future surveillance of use of tattoo inks in studios, toxicology aspects and the impact of regulatory intervention on the tattooing industry, with a large sample of data collected in 2018-19. Wordcount 249.</p>","PeriodicalId":11185,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The new EU regulation on tattoo inks in force January 2022 in a hitherto unregulated market marks a historical change.

Objective: Mapping of the thousands of tattoo inks de facto used in studios before the new EU regulation and establish a historical reference to tattoo customer exposure, ink toxicology assessment, clinical complications, and the impact on tattooing businesses.

Method: A tattooist-operated electronic system (InkBase) for ink registration required by law is used in Denmark since 2018. A local database in studios refers to a central database. Clients, sessions, ink bottles, brand name, and pigment color index (CI) are registered. Person's data protection is respected. Tracing harmful inks is possible, with public warning.

Results: Registrations from 108 studios employing about 700 tattooists were collected from March 2018 through 2019. 39687 clients were tattooed in 50604 sessions, using colors from 109720 ink bottles. 10833 were CI-labelled identifying the pigment. 98.1% of inks originated from USA. Detailed statistics on inks and pigments used are provided as a benchmark showing the spontaneous use and preference of "old" tattoo inks before the EU regulation compulsory to member states introduced dramatic restrictions difficult to follow.

Conclusions: Denmark can, having detailed ink registration enforced by law and having a commonly used electronic registration system reporting to a central server, function as an index country in future surveillance of use of tattoo inks in studios, toxicology aspects and the impact of regulatory intervention on the tattooing industry, with a large sample of data collected in 2018-19. Wordcount 249.

纹身油墨产品和颜料2018-19年前期EUREACH新法规:丹麦黄金基准对108个工作室和39687个客户进行了研究,他们使用了109720个墨水瓶中的墨水。
背景:欧盟关于纹身墨水的新法规将于 2022 年 1 月生效,这标志着迄今为止尚无监管的市场发生了历史性变化:绘制欧盟新法规实施前工作室实际使用的数千种纹身墨水的图谱,并为纹身顾客的纹身接触、墨水毒理学评估、临床并发症以及对纹身行业的影响建立历史参考:自 2018 年起,丹麦使用由纹身师操作的电子系统(InkBase)进行法律规定的油墨登记。工作室的本地数据库与中央数据库相互参照。客户、疗程、墨水瓶、品牌名称和颜料颜色指数(CI)都会被登记。个人数据保护得到尊重。可追溯有害油墨,并向公众发出警告:从 2018 年 3 月到 2019 年,共收集了 108 家工作室约 700 名纹身师的注册信息。在 50604 个疗程中为 39687 名顾客进行了纹身,使用了 109720 瓶墨水中的颜色。其中 10833 瓶带有识别颜料的 CI 标签。98.1%的墨水来自美国。我们提供了所使用墨水和颜料的详细统计数据,以此作为基准,显示在欧盟强制成员国引入难以遵循的严格限制之前,"老式 "纹身墨水的自发使用和偏好情况:丹麦通过法律强制执行详细的墨水登记,并拥有一个向中央服务器报告的常用电子登记系统,可作为未来监测工作室纹身墨水使用情况、毒理学方面以及监管干预对纹身行业影响的指标国家,并在 2018-19 年收集大量数据样本。字数 249。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatology
Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1893, ''Dermatology'' provides a worldwide survey of clinical and investigative dermatology. Original papers report clinical and laboratory findings. In order to inform readers of the implications of recent research, editorials and reviews prepared by invited, internationally recognized scientists are regularly featured. In addition to original papers, the journal publishes rapid communications, short communications, and letters to ''Dermatology''. ''Dermatology'' answers the complete information needs of practitioners concerned with progress in research related to skin, clinical dermatology and therapy. The journal enjoys a high scientific reputation with a continually increasing impact factor and an equally high circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信