Pilot Study of a Modified DOPS Scale for Insulin Pump and CGM Installation Training in Chinese Medical Students During Endocrinology Rotations.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Yue Yuan, Congcong Wang, Song Wen, Yanyan Li, Chenglin Xu, Fang Yu, Xiucai Li, Yanju He, Lijiao Chen, Yishu Ren, Ligang Zhou
{"title":"Pilot Study of a Modified DOPS Scale for Insulin Pump and CGM Installation Training in Chinese Medical Students During Endocrinology Rotations.","authors":"Yue Yuan, Congcong Wang, Song Wen, Yanyan Li, Chenglin Xu, Fang Yu, Xiucai Li, Yanju He, Lijiao Chen, Yishu Ren, Ligang Zhou","doi":"10.2147/DMSO.S489435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) is a clinical assessment tool that enables trainers to observe medical students' procedural abilities in real-time clinical settings. It assesses students' knowledge application, decision-making, and skill proficiency during clinical tasks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study modifies the DOPS to evaluate the operation of insulin pumps (PUMP) and continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMS) in diabetes management. Key elements of the modified DOPS include 1) Knowledge Assessment: Evaluating understanding of PUMP and CGMS, including interpreting CGMS data for insulin adjustments; 2) Operational Skills: Assessing correct PUMP needle insertion, programming, and adjustments; 3) Patient Safety: Ensuring safe and aseptic procedures; 4) Feedback: Providing constructive feedback to help students improve their skills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Training through DOPS led to significant improvements in all domains, overall performance scores, and reduced execution time for each domain. Correlations between domains showed that PUMP indication scores were linked to all other domains and execution times, including re-evaluation. Communication skills and seeking assistance were crucial factors influencing other domains. Multilinear regression analysis revealed that while DOPS-CGMS (R square 1.0) fully explained performance scores, DOPS-PUMP (R square 0.984) indicated that additional personal qualities significantly impacted students' PUMP operation performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This customized DOPS form offers insights into students' abilities in managing diabetes with PUMP and CGMS, while emphasizing the need for training on both technical skills and interpersonal skills in future educational models.</p>","PeriodicalId":11116,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","volume":"18 ","pages":"37-50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S489435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) is a clinical assessment tool that enables trainers to observe medical students' procedural abilities in real-time clinical settings. It assesses students' knowledge application, decision-making, and skill proficiency during clinical tasks.

Methods: This study modifies the DOPS to evaluate the operation of insulin pumps (PUMP) and continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMS) in diabetes management. Key elements of the modified DOPS include 1) Knowledge Assessment: Evaluating understanding of PUMP and CGMS, including interpreting CGMS data for insulin adjustments; 2) Operational Skills: Assessing correct PUMP needle insertion, programming, and adjustments; 3) Patient Safety: Ensuring safe and aseptic procedures; 4) Feedback: Providing constructive feedback to help students improve their skills.

Results: Training through DOPS led to significant improvements in all domains, overall performance scores, and reduced execution time for each domain. Correlations between domains showed that PUMP indication scores were linked to all other domains and execution times, including re-evaluation. Communication skills and seeking assistance were crucial factors influencing other domains. Multilinear regression analysis revealed that while DOPS-CGMS (R square 1.0) fully explained performance scores, DOPS-PUMP (R square 0.984) indicated that additional personal qualities significantly impacted students' PUMP operation performance.

Conclusion: This customized DOPS form offers insights into students' abilities in managing diabetes with PUMP and CGMS, while emphasizing the need for training on both technical skills and interpersonal skills in future educational models.

改良DOPS量表对中国医学生内分泌轮转期间胰岛素泵及CGM安装训练的初步研究。
背景:程序性技能直接观察(DOPS)是一种临床评估工具,使培训师能够实时观察医学生的临床操作能力。它评估学生在临床任务中的知识应用、决策和技能熟练程度。方法:对DOPS进行修改,评价胰岛素泵(PUMP)和连续血糖监测系统(CGMS)在糖尿病管理中的作用。修改后的DOPS的关键要素包括:1)知识评估:评估对PUMP和CGMS的理解,包括解释CGMS数据以调整胰岛素;2)操作技能:评估正确的泵针插入、编程和调整;3)患者安全:确保安全无菌程序;4)反馈:提供建设性的反馈,帮助学生提高技能。结果:通过DOPS进行的培训在所有领域、总体性能分数和每个领域的执行时间上都有了显著的提高。领域之间的相关性表明,PUMP指示分数与所有其他领域和执行时间(包括重新评估)相关联。沟通技巧和寻求援助是影响其他领域的关键因素。多元线性回归分析显示,DOPS-CGMS (R平方1.0)完全解释了成绩分数,而DOPS-PUMP (R平方0.984)表明,额外的个人素质显著影响学生的PUMP操作成绩。结论:该定制的DOPS表格提供了对学生使用PUMP和CGMS管理糖尿病的能力的洞察,同时强调了在未来的教育模式中对技术技能和人际交往能力的培训的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
431
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. The journal is committed to the rapid publication of the latest laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity research. Original research, review, case reports, hypothesis formation, expert opinion and commentaries are all considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信