Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary-Who Can Be Offered Surgery as the Sole Treatment Modality? A Systematic Review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Arunjit Takhar, Mark D Wilkie, Devraj Srinivasan, Emma King
{"title":"Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary-Who Can Be Offered Surgery as the Sole Treatment Modality? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Arunjit Takhar, Mark D Wilkie, Devraj Srinivasan, Emma King","doi":"10.1111/coa.14279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the role of surgery as the sole treatment modality for patients with cervical head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (HNSCCUP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review of observational cohort studies with qualitative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled register of Trials (CENTRAL) were screened from January 2000 up to October 2021.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with HNSCCUP after completing diagnostic workup subsequently treated with single-modality surgery.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was 3-year overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), primary emergence, regional recurrence, and distant metastasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen eligible studies were identified, including 1780 patients, of whom 294 received surgery as their sole treatment (seven studies) with 3-year OS ranging from 43.9% to 100%. 3-year DFS was reported in four studies (n = 62) ranging from 42.8% to 67.0%. 5-year OS and DFS were available in three studies (n = 31), ranging from 36.6% to 75.0%, and 43.6% to 67.0%, respectively. The rate of primary emergence ranged from 11.1% to 33.3% (seven studies, n = 157), regional relapse from 0.0% to 50.0% (five studies, n = 60) and distant metastasis from 0.0% to 3.3% (three studies, n = 45). Patients undergoing surgery as a sole treatment had predominantly p16/HPV positive N1 (TNM7) disease without ECS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcomes for HNSCCUP patients undergoing surgery alone range widely in the literature but may be reasonable in a subset of patients with early-stage p16/HPV positive disease. Data is lacking for p16/HPV negative disease where the potential primary site is more varied and primary emergence appears more common.</p>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14279","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the role of surgery as the sole treatment modality for patients with cervical head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (HNSCCUP).

Design: Systematic review of observational cohort studies with qualitative synthesis.

Setting: PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled register of Trials (CENTRAL) were screened from January 2000 up to October 2021.

Participants: Patients with HNSCCUP after completing diagnostic workup subsequently treated with single-modality surgery.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was 3-year overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), primary emergence, regional recurrence, and distant metastasis.

Results: Fourteen eligible studies were identified, including 1780 patients, of whom 294 received surgery as their sole treatment (seven studies) with 3-year OS ranging from 43.9% to 100%. 3-year DFS was reported in four studies (n = 62) ranging from 42.8% to 67.0%. 5-year OS and DFS were available in three studies (n = 31), ranging from 36.6% to 75.0%, and 43.6% to 67.0%, respectively. The rate of primary emergence ranged from 11.1% to 33.3% (seven studies, n = 157), regional relapse from 0.0% to 50.0% (five studies, n = 60) and distant metastasis from 0.0% to 3.3% (three studies, n = 45). Patients undergoing surgery as a sole treatment had predominantly p16/HPV positive N1 (TNM7) disease without ECS.

Conclusion: Outcomes for HNSCCUP patients undergoing surgery alone range widely in the literature but may be reasonable in a subset of patients with early-stage p16/HPV positive disease. Data is lacking for p16/HPV negative disease where the potential primary site is more varied and primary emergence appears more common.

原发不明的头颈部鳞状细胞癌-谁可以提供手术作为唯一的治疗方式?系统评价。
摘要评估手术作为原发灶不明的颈部头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCCUP)患者唯一治疗方式的作用:设计:对观察性队列研究进行系统回顾,并进行定性综合:筛选2000年1月至2021年10月期间的PubMed、Ovid EMBASE和Cochrane试验对照注册表(CENTRAL):主要结局指标:主要结果为3年总生存率(OS)。次要结局包括无病生存期(DFS)、原发病、区域复发和远处转移:共确定了 14 项符合条件的研究,包括 1780 名患者,其中 294 人接受了手术作为唯一的治疗方法(7 项研究),3 年 OS 从 43.9% 到 100% 不等。4项研究(n = 62)报告了3年DFS,从42.8%到67.0%不等。有三项研究(n = 31)提供了 5 年 OS 和 DFS,分别为 36.6% 至 75.0% 和 43.6% 至 67.0%。原发率从11.1%到33.3%不等(7项研究,n = 157),区域复发率从0.0%到50.0%不等(5项研究,n = 60),远处转移率从0.0%到3.3%不等(3项研究,n = 45)。接受手术作为唯一治疗方法的患者主要患有 p16/HPV 阳性 N1(TNM7)疾病,且无 ECS:结论:接受单纯手术治疗的HNSCCUP患者的预后在文献中差异很大,但对于p16/HPV阳性的早期患者来说可能是合理的。p16/HPV阴性疾病的潜在原发部位更为多样,原发出现的情况似乎更为常见,但目前尚缺乏这方面的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Otolaryngology
Clinical Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with: current otorhinolaryngological practice audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL head and neck oncology head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery continuing medical education and ORL training The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research. Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject. • Negative/null results In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信