National validation of laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer: Comparison of a randomized controlled trial and real-world practice results.
Bang Wool Eom, Mira Han, Hong Man Yoon, Woo Jin Hyung, Han-Kwang Yang, Young-Kyu Park, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Ji Yeong An, Wook Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Hyung-Ho Kim, Seung Wan Ryu, Hoon Hur, Min-Chan Kim, Seong-Ho Kong, Gyu Seok Cho, Jin-Jo Kim, Do Joong Park, Young-Woo Kim, Jong Won Kim, Joo-Ho Lee, Sang-Uk Han, Keun Won Ryu, The Information Committee Of The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
{"title":"National validation of laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer: Comparison of a randomized controlled trial and real-world practice results.","authors":"Bang Wool Eom, Mira Han, Hong Man Yoon, Woo Jin Hyung, Han-Kwang Yang, Young-Kyu Park, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Ji Yeong An, Wook Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Hyung-Ho Kim, Seung Wan Ryu, Hoon Hur, Min-Chan Kim, Seong-Ho Kong, Gyu Seok Cho, Jin-Jo Kim, Do Joong Park, Young-Woo Kim, Jong Won Kim, Joo-Ho Lee, Sang-Uk Han, Keun Won Ryu, The Information Committee Of The Korean Gastric Cancer Association","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.06.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer has recently been adopted based on the results of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, findings from RCTs have not been examined at the national level. This study aimed to investigate the external validity of the Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study-02 (KLASS-02) trial involving 13 tertiary hospitals, using data from the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA)-led nationwide survey involving 68 tertiary or general hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on patients who underwent laparoscopic or open distal gastrectomy for pathological stage IB-IIIC gastric cancer under the same conditions were collected from the KLASS-02 trial and the KGCA nationwide survey datasets. Surgical outcomes were assessed for each dataset and multivariable analyses were performed to examine the effect of the laparoscopic approach on surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The laparoscopic group had a lower overall complication rate than the open group in both KLASS-02 and KGCA datasets (16.1% <i>vs</i>. 23.5% for the KLASS-02 and 12.6% <i>vs</i>. 19.6% for the KGCA). Moreover, the laparoscopic group had fewer wound problems, and fewer grade II, IIIa, and IV complications than the open group in the KGCA data (0.8% <i>vs</i>. 3.4%, 5.8% <i>vs</i>. 10.4%, 2.3% <i>vs</i>. 3.7%, and 0.5% <i>vs</i>. 1.4%, respectively), which were not observed in the KLASS-02 data. Multivariable analyses revealed that the laparoscopic approach was not associated with overall complications, but reduced wound problems and more harvested lymph nodes in the KGCA survey data (adjusted odds ratios, 0.19 for wound problems, adjusted β coefficient 4.39 for number of harvested lymph nodes), which were not shown in the KLASS-02 data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer were validated at a national level. The laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer can be implemented in the Republic of Korea.</p>","PeriodicalId":9882,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","volume":"36 6","pages":"742-751"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.06.11","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer has recently been adopted based on the results of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, findings from RCTs have not been examined at the national level. This study aimed to investigate the external validity of the Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study-02 (KLASS-02) trial involving 13 tertiary hospitals, using data from the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA)-led nationwide survey involving 68 tertiary or general hospitals.
Methods: Data on patients who underwent laparoscopic or open distal gastrectomy for pathological stage IB-IIIC gastric cancer under the same conditions were collected from the KLASS-02 trial and the KGCA nationwide survey datasets. Surgical outcomes were assessed for each dataset and multivariable analyses were performed to examine the effect of the laparoscopic approach on surgical outcomes.
Results: The laparoscopic group had a lower overall complication rate than the open group in both KLASS-02 and KGCA datasets (16.1% vs. 23.5% for the KLASS-02 and 12.6% vs. 19.6% for the KGCA). Moreover, the laparoscopic group had fewer wound problems, and fewer grade II, IIIa, and IV complications than the open group in the KGCA data (0.8% vs. 3.4%, 5.8% vs. 10.4%, 2.3% vs. 3.7%, and 0.5% vs. 1.4%, respectively), which were not observed in the KLASS-02 data. Multivariable analyses revealed that the laparoscopic approach was not associated with overall complications, but reduced wound problems and more harvested lymph nodes in the KGCA survey data (adjusted odds ratios, 0.19 for wound problems, adjusted β coefficient 4.39 for number of harvested lymph nodes), which were not shown in the KLASS-02 data.
Conclusions: The safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer were validated at a national level. The laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer can be implemented in the Republic of Korea.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Cancer Research (CJCR; Print ISSN: 1000-9604; Online ISSN:1993-0631) is published by AME Publishing Company in association with Chinese Anti-Cancer Association.It was launched in March 1995 as a quarterly publication and is now published bi-monthly since February 2013.
CJCR is published bi-monthly in English, and is an international journal devoted to the life sciences and medical sciences. It publishes peer-reviewed original articles of basic investigations and clinical observations, reviews and brief communications providing a forum for the recent experimental and clinical advances in cancer research. This journal is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), PubMed/PubMed Central (PMC), Scopus, SciSearch, Chemistry Abstracts (CA), the Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, Chinainfo, CNKI, CSCI, etc.