National validation of laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer: Comparison of a randomized controlled trial and real-world practice results.

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Bang Wool Eom, Mira Han, Hong Man Yoon, Woo Jin Hyung, Han-Kwang Yang, Young-Kyu Park, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Ji Yeong An, Wook Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Hyung-Ho Kim, Seung Wan Ryu, Hoon Hur, Min-Chan Kim, Seong-Ho Kong, Gyu Seok Cho, Jin-Jo Kim, Do Joong Park, Young-Woo Kim, Jong Won Kim, Joo-Ho Lee, Sang-Uk Han, Keun Won Ryu, The Information Committee Of The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
{"title":"National validation of laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer: Comparison of a randomized controlled trial and real-world practice results.","authors":"Bang Wool Eom, Mira Han, Hong Man Yoon, Woo Jin Hyung, Han-Kwang Yang, Young-Kyu Park, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Ji Yeong An, Wook Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Hyung-Ho Kim, Seung Wan Ryu, Hoon Hur, Min-Chan Kim, Seong-Ho Kong, Gyu Seok Cho, Jin-Jo Kim, Do Joong Park, Young-Woo Kim, Jong Won Kim, Joo-Ho Lee, Sang-Uk Han, Keun Won Ryu, The Information Committee Of The Korean Gastric Cancer Association","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.06.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer has recently been adopted based on the results of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, findings from RCTs have not been examined at the national level. This study aimed to investigate the external validity of the Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study-02 (KLASS-02) trial involving 13 tertiary hospitals, using data from the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA)-led nationwide survey involving 68 tertiary or general hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on patients who underwent laparoscopic or open distal gastrectomy for pathological stage IB-IIIC gastric cancer under the same conditions were collected from the KLASS-02 trial and the KGCA nationwide survey datasets. Surgical outcomes were assessed for each dataset and multivariable analyses were performed to examine the effect of the laparoscopic approach on surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The laparoscopic group had a lower overall complication rate than the open group in both KLASS-02 and KGCA datasets (16.1% <i>vs</i>. 23.5% for the KLASS-02 and 12.6% <i>vs</i>. 19.6% for the KGCA). Moreover, the laparoscopic group had fewer wound problems, and fewer grade II, IIIa, and IV complications than the open group in the KGCA data (0.8% <i>vs</i>. 3.4%, 5.8% <i>vs</i>. 10.4%, 2.3% <i>vs</i>. 3.7%, and 0.5% <i>vs</i>. 1.4%, respectively), which were not observed in the KLASS-02 data. Multivariable analyses revealed that the laparoscopic approach was not associated with overall complications, but reduced wound problems and more harvested lymph nodes in the KGCA survey data (adjusted odds ratios, 0.19 for wound problems, adjusted β coefficient 4.39 for number of harvested lymph nodes), which were not shown in the KLASS-02 data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer were validated at a national level. The laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer can be implemented in the Republic of Korea.</p>","PeriodicalId":9882,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","volume":"36 6","pages":"742-751"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.06.11","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer has recently been adopted based on the results of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, findings from RCTs have not been examined at the national level. This study aimed to investigate the external validity of the Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study-02 (KLASS-02) trial involving 13 tertiary hospitals, using data from the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA)-led nationwide survey involving 68 tertiary or general hospitals.

Methods: Data on patients who underwent laparoscopic or open distal gastrectomy for pathological stage IB-IIIC gastric cancer under the same conditions were collected from the KLASS-02 trial and the KGCA nationwide survey datasets. Surgical outcomes were assessed for each dataset and multivariable analyses were performed to examine the effect of the laparoscopic approach on surgical outcomes.

Results: The laparoscopic group had a lower overall complication rate than the open group in both KLASS-02 and KGCA datasets (16.1% vs. 23.5% for the KLASS-02 and 12.6% vs. 19.6% for the KGCA). Moreover, the laparoscopic group had fewer wound problems, and fewer grade II, IIIa, and IV complications than the open group in the KGCA data (0.8% vs. 3.4%, 5.8% vs. 10.4%, 2.3% vs. 3.7%, and 0.5% vs. 1.4%, respectively), which were not observed in the KLASS-02 data. Multivariable analyses revealed that the laparoscopic approach was not associated with overall complications, but reduced wound problems and more harvested lymph nodes in the KGCA survey data (adjusted odds ratios, 0.19 for wound problems, adjusted β coefficient 4.39 for number of harvested lymph nodes), which were not shown in the KLASS-02 data.

Conclusions: The safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer were validated at a national level. The laparoscopic approach for locally advanced gastric cancer can be implemented in the Republic of Korea.

国家验证腹腔镜入路治疗局部晚期胃癌:一项随机对照试验和现实世界实践结果的比较。
目的:根据几项随机对照试验(RCTs)的结果,腹腔镜入路治疗局部晚期胃癌已被广泛采用。然而,随机对照试验的结果尚未在国家层面进行检验。本研究旨在探讨韩国腹腔镜胃肠手术研究-02 (KLASS-02)试验的外部有效性,该试验涉及13家三级医院,使用的数据来自韩国胃癌协会(KGCA)领导的涉及68家三级或综合医院的全国性调查。方法:从KLASS-02试验和KGCA全国调查数据集中收集相同条件下病理期IB-IIIC胃癌行腹腔镜或开放式远端胃切除术患者的数据。对每个数据集的手术结果进行评估,并进行多变量分析以检查腹腔镜入路对手术结果的影响。结果:在KLASS-02和KGCA数据集中,腹腔镜组的总并发症发生率低于开放组(KLASS-02为16.1%比23.5%,KGCA为12.6%比19.6%)。此外,在KGCA数据中,腹腔镜组的伤口问题更少,II级、IIIa级和IV级并发症比开放组更少(分别为0.8%对3.4%,5.8%对10.4%,2.3%对3.7%,0.5%对1.4%),而在KLASS-02数据中没有观察到这一点。多变量分析显示,腹腔镜入路与总体并发症无关,但在KGCA调查数据中减少了伤口问题和更多的淋巴结清扫(调整后的优势比,伤口问题0.19,淋巴结清扫数调整后的β系数4.39),这在KLASS-02数据中没有显示出来。结论:腹腔镜入路治疗局部进展期胃癌的安全性和可行性在全国范围内得到验证。腹腔镜入路治疗局部晚期胃癌可在韩国实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
1726
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Cancer Research (CJCR; Print ISSN: 1000-9604; Online ISSN:1993-0631) is published by AME Publishing Company in association with Chinese Anti-Cancer Association.It was launched in March 1995 as a quarterly publication and is now published bi-monthly since February 2013. CJCR is published bi-monthly in English, and is an international journal devoted to the life sciences and medical sciences. It publishes peer-reviewed original articles of basic investigations and clinical observations, reviews and brief communications providing a forum for the recent experimental and clinical advances in cancer research. This journal is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), PubMed/PubMed Central (PMC), Scopus, SciSearch, Chemistry Abstracts (CA), the Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, Chinainfo, CNKI, CSCI, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信