Daniel Palkovics, Alexandra Hegyi, Balint Molnar, Mark Frater, Csaba Pinter, David García-Mato, Andres Diaz-Pinto, Peter Windisch
{"title":"Assessment of hard tissue changes after horizontal guided bone regeneration with the aid of deep learning CBCT segmentation.","authors":"Daniel Palkovics, Alexandra Hegyi, Balint Molnar, Mark Frater, Csaba Pinter, David García-Mato, Andres Diaz-Pinto, Peter Windisch","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06136-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model for segmenting cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans taken before and after mandibular horizontal guided bone regeneration (GBR) to evaluate hard tissue changes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The proposed SegResNet-based DL model was trained on 70 CBCT scans. It was tested on 10 pairs of pre- and post-operative CBCT scans of patients who underwent mandibular horizontal GBR. DL segmentations were compared to semi-automated (SA) segmentations of the same scans. Augmented hard tissue segmentation performance was evaluated by spatially aligning pre- and post-operative CBCT scans and subtracting preoperative segmentations obtained by DL and SA segmentations from the respective postoperative segmentations. The performance of DL compared to SA segmentation was evaluated based on the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over the union (IoU), Hausdorff distance (HD95), and volume comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean DSC and IoU between DL and SA segmentations were 0.96 ± 0.01 and 0.92 ± 0.02 in both pre- and post-operative CBCT scans. While HD95 values between DL and SA segmentations were 0.62 mm ± 0.16 mm and 0.77 mm ± 0.31 mm for pre- and post-operative CBCTs respectively. The DSC, IoU and HD95 averaged 0.85 ± 0.08; 0.78 ± 0.07 and 0.91 ± 0.92 mm for augmented hard tissue models respectively. Volumes mandible- and augmented hard tissue segmentations did not differ significantly between the DL and SA methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SegResNet-based DL model accurately segmented CBCT scans acquired before and after mandibular horizontal GBR. However, the training database must be further increased to increase the model's robustness.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Automated DL segmentation could aid treatment planning for GBR and subsequent implant placement procedures and in evaluating hard tissue changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06136-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model for segmenting cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans taken before and after mandibular horizontal guided bone regeneration (GBR) to evaluate hard tissue changes.
Materials and methods: The proposed SegResNet-based DL model was trained on 70 CBCT scans. It was tested on 10 pairs of pre- and post-operative CBCT scans of patients who underwent mandibular horizontal GBR. DL segmentations were compared to semi-automated (SA) segmentations of the same scans. Augmented hard tissue segmentation performance was evaluated by spatially aligning pre- and post-operative CBCT scans and subtracting preoperative segmentations obtained by DL and SA segmentations from the respective postoperative segmentations. The performance of DL compared to SA segmentation was evaluated based on the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over the union (IoU), Hausdorff distance (HD95), and volume comparison.
Results: The mean DSC and IoU between DL and SA segmentations were 0.96 ± 0.01 and 0.92 ± 0.02 in both pre- and post-operative CBCT scans. While HD95 values between DL and SA segmentations were 0.62 mm ± 0.16 mm and 0.77 mm ± 0.31 mm for pre- and post-operative CBCTs respectively. The DSC, IoU and HD95 averaged 0.85 ± 0.08; 0.78 ± 0.07 and 0.91 ± 0.92 mm for augmented hard tissue models respectively. Volumes mandible- and augmented hard tissue segmentations did not differ significantly between the DL and SA methods.
Conclusions: The SegResNet-based DL model accurately segmented CBCT scans acquired before and after mandibular horizontal GBR. However, the training database must be further increased to increase the model's robustness.
Clinical relevance: Automated DL segmentation could aid treatment planning for GBR and subsequent implant placement procedures and in evaluating hard tissue changes.
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.