Yixia Lin, Mingxing Xie, Li Zhang, Yanting Zhang, Peige Zhang, Xin Chen, Mengmeng Ji, Lang Gao, Qing He, Zhenni Wu, Yali Yang, Yuman Li
{"title":"Prognostic Value of LV Global Longitudinal Strain by 2D and 3D Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in Patients With HFpEF.","authors":"Yixia Lin, Mingxing Xie, Li Zhang, Yanting Zhang, Peige Zhang, Xin Chen, Mengmeng Ji, Lang Gao, Qing He, Zhenni Wu, Yali Yang, Yuman Li","doi":"10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.016975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), the impact of type 2 diabetes (T2D) on left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) and its prognostic implications remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate LV function using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) speckle-tracking echocardiography in patients with HFpEF with and without T2D, and to investigate its prognostic significance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 335 patients with HFpEF were prospectively enrolled for echocardiographic evaluation. LV GLS was obtained using 2D- and 3D-speckle-tracking echocardiography. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine predictors of adverse outcomes. The C-index, Akaike information criterion, integrated discrimination improvement, and net reclassification improvement were used to assess model performance and discriminative ability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LV 2D-GLS and 3D-GLS were impaired in patients with HFpEF and T2D compared with those without T2D. After a median follow-up of 17.6 months, 150 patients experienced adverse outcomes. Both 2D-GLS (hazard ratio, 1.323 [95% CI, 1.225-1.429]; <i>P</i><0.001) and 3D-GLS (hazard ratio, 1.412 [95% CI, 1.316-1.515]; <i>P</i><0.001) were independent predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with HFpEF after adjustment for confounders. The predictive accuracy of a model incorporating 3D-GLS (Akaike information criterion=-583.9, C-index=0.775 [95% CI, 0.742-0.808]) was superior to models using 2D-GLS (Akaike information criterion=-533.3, C-index=0.719 [95% CI, 0.678-0.760], ΔC-index=0.056; <i>P</i>=0.034) and LV ejection fraction (Akaike information criterion=-498.9, C-index=0.659 [95% CI, 0.610-0.708], ΔC-index=0.116; <i>P</i><0.001). The addition of 2D-GLS and 3D-GLS to the base model significantly enhanced its discriminatory and predictive abilities (integrated discrimination improvement=0.225 and 0.280; net reclassification improvement=0.612 and 0.734, respectively, <i>P</i><0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LV 2D-GLS and 3D-GLS are impaired in patients with HFpEF and T2D, and are independent predictors of adverse outcomes. Moreover, 3D-GLS provides incremental prognostic value over 2D-GLS.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/; Unique identifier: ChiCTR2100047487.</p>","PeriodicalId":10202,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"e016975"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.016975","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), the impact of type 2 diabetes (T2D) on left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) and its prognostic implications remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate LV function using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) speckle-tracking echocardiography in patients with HFpEF with and without T2D, and to investigate its prognostic significance.
Methods: A total of 335 patients with HFpEF were prospectively enrolled for echocardiographic evaluation. LV GLS was obtained using 2D- and 3D-speckle-tracking echocardiography. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine predictors of adverse outcomes. The C-index, Akaike information criterion, integrated discrimination improvement, and net reclassification improvement were used to assess model performance and discriminative ability.
Results: LV 2D-GLS and 3D-GLS were impaired in patients with HFpEF and T2D compared with those without T2D. After a median follow-up of 17.6 months, 150 patients experienced adverse outcomes. Both 2D-GLS (hazard ratio, 1.323 [95% CI, 1.225-1.429]; P<0.001) and 3D-GLS (hazard ratio, 1.412 [95% CI, 1.316-1.515]; P<0.001) were independent predictors of adverse outcomes in patients with HFpEF after adjustment for confounders. The predictive accuracy of a model incorporating 3D-GLS (Akaike information criterion=-583.9, C-index=0.775 [95% CI, 0.742-0.808]) was superior to models using 2D-GLS (Akaike information criterion=-533.3, C-index=0.719 [95% CI, 0.678-0.760], ΔC-index=0.056; P=0.034) and LV ejection fraction (Akaike information criterion=-498.9, C-index=0.659 [95% CI, 0.610-0.708], ΔC-index=0.116; P<0.001). The addition of 2D-GLS and 3D-GLS to the base model significantly enhanced its discriminatory and predictive abilities (integrated discrimination improvement=0.225 and 0.280; net reclassification improvement=0.612 and 0.734, respectively, P<0.001 for all).
Conclusions: LV 2D-GLS and 3D-GLS are impaired in patients with HFpEF and T2D, and are independent predictors of adverse outcomes. Moreover, 3D-GLS provides incremental prognostic value over 2D-GLS.
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, an American Heart Association journal, publishes high-quality, patient-centric articles focusing on observational studies, clinical trials, and advances in applied (translational) research. The journal features innovative, multimodality approaches to the diagnosis and risk stratification of cardiovascular disease. Modalities covered include echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy, magnetic resonance angiography, cardiac positron emission tomography, noninvasive assessment of vascular and endothelial function, radionuclide imaging, molecular imaging, and others.
Article types considered by Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging include Original Research, Research Letters, Advances in Cardiovascular Imaging, Clinical Implications of Molecular Imaging Research, How to Use Imaging, Translating Novel Imaging Technologies into Clinical Applications, and Cardiovascular Images.